Skip to main content
Log in

Cytogenetics and cytotaxonomy ofVelloziaceae

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chromosome number and other cytological features are reported from 35 species ofVelloziaceae, including several African and Brazilian populations. All analyzed species show areticulate interphase nuclei and prophase/prometaphase chromosomes with proximal early condensation. Most heteropycnotic blocks do not seem to correspond to heterochromatin since, at least inVellozia patens, they do not stain differentially after C-banding procedures. Regarding the chromosome number, three main groups could be identified. The first comprised diploid species of the generaNanuza, Vellozia and the Brazilian species ofXerophyta with 2n = 14 or 16; the second comprised tetraploid species with 2n = 34, and included all Brazilian species of subfam.Barbacenioideae; the third group, of hexaploid species, comprised the African representatives of the genusXerophyta. A single population ofVellozia, possibly of hybrid origin, had 2n ≅ 32. A basic number of x = 8 is proposed for the family. The karyological information supports the hypothesis that theVelloziaceae originated on the South American, rather than on the African continent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayensu, E. S., 1973: Phytogeography and evolution of theVelloziaceae. — InMeggers, B. J., Ayensu, E. S., Duckworth, W. D., (Eds): Tropical forest ecosystems in Africa and South America: comparative review, pp. 105–119. — Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, P., 1977: Determinants of nuclear chromatin structure in angiosperms. — Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot., 12e Sér.,18: 193–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist, A., 1988: The evolution and classification of flowering plants. — New York: New York Botanical Garden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, R., 1977: A commentary on a diagrammatic presentation of the angiosperms in relation to the distribution of character states. — Pl. Syst. Evol., Suppl.1: 253–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delay, C., 1949: Recherches sur la structure des noyaux quiescents chez les phanérogames. — Ph.D. Thesis. Paris.

  • Deumling, B., Greilhuber, J., 1982: Characterization of heterochromatin in different species of theScilla siberica group (Liliaceae) by in situ hybridization of satellite DNAs and fluorochrome banding. — Chromosoma84: 535–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrendorfer, F., 1980: Polyploidy and distribution. — InLewis, W. H., (Ed.): Polyploidy — biological relevance, pp. 45–60. — New York, London: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Favarger, C., 1978: Philosophie des comptages de chromosomes. — Taxon27: 441–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldblatt, P., 1980: Polyploidy in angiosperms: monocotyledons. — InLewis, W. H., (Ed.): Polyploidy—biological relevance, pp. 219–239. — New York, London: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1988: Observations on the chromosome cytology ofVelloziaceae. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.75: 192–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, V., 1981: Plant speciation, 2nd edn. — New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greilhuber, J., Ehrendorfer, F., 1988: Karyological approaches to plant taxonomy. — ISI Atlas of Science: Animal Pl. Sci.1: 289–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerra, M., 1983: O uso do Giemsa na citogenética vegetal—comparação entre a coloração simples e o bandeamento. — Ci. & Cult.35: 190–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1987: Cytogenetics ofRutaceae IV. Structure and systematic significance of interphase nuclei. — Cytologia52: 213–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1988: Characterization of different types of condensed chromatin inCostus (Zingiberaceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.158: 107–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harborne, J. B., Williams, C. A., Greenham, J., Eagles, J., 1994: Variations in the lipophilic and vacuolar flavonoids of the genusVellozia. — Phytochemistry35: 1475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, J., 1934: The families of flowering plants, 2. Monocotyledons. — London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D. A., Funderburg, S. W., 1979: Genome size in angiosperms: temperate versus tropical species. — Amer. Naturalist114: 784–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, W. H., 1980: Polyploidy in plant evolution: summary. — InLewis, W. H., (Ed.): Polyploidy — biological relevance, pp. 241–268. — New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mello-Silva, R. de, 1991: The infra-familial taxonomic circumscription of theVelloziaceae: a historical and critical analysis. — Taxon40: 45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menezes, N. L., 1971: New taxa and new combinations inVelloziaceae. — Ci. & Cult.23: 421–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1980: Evolution inVelloziaceae, with special reference to androecial characters. — InBrickell, C. D., Cutler, D. F., Gregory, M., (Eds): Petaloid monocotyledons. — Linn. Soc. Symp. Ser.8: 117–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1988: Evolution of the anther in the familyVelloziaceae. — Bol. Bot. Univ. São Paulo10: 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1991:Burlemarxia, a new genus ofVelloziaceae. — Taxon40: 413–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1994: A cladistic analysis of theVelloziaceae. — Kew Bull.49: 71–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morawetz, W., 1988: Karyosystematics and evolution of AustralianAnnonaceae as compared withEupomatiaceae, Himantandraceae andAustrobaileyaceae. — Pl. Syst. Evol.159: 49–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, P. H., 1975: The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: cytology. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.62: 724–764.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salatino, M. L. F., Salatino, A., Menezes, N. L., Mello-Silva, R. de, 1989: Alkanes of foliar epicuticular waxes ofVelloziaceae. — Phytochemistry28: 1105–1114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzacher, T., Ambros, P., Schweizer, D., 1980: Application of Giemsa banding to orchid karyotype analysis. — Pl. Syst. Evol.134: 293–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer, D., 1976: Reverse fluorescent chromosome banding with chromomycin and DAPI. — Chromosoma58: 307–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, A. K., 1984: Chromosome evolution in the monocotyledons—an overview. — InSharma, A. K., Sharma, A., (Eds): Chromosome evolution in eucaryotic groups II: 169–187. — Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1971: I. Cytotaxonomy of the familyBromeliaceae. — Cytologia36: 237–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. B., Ayensu, E. S., 1976: A revision of AmericanVelloziaceae. — Smithsonian Contrib. Bot.30: 1–172. — Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G. L., 1971: Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. — London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenar, A. H. S., 1925: Embryologische Studien II. Embryologie der Amaryllideen. — Ph.D. Thesis, Uppsala.

  • Takhtajan, 1969: Flowering plants: origin and dispersal (translated from Russian byJefrey, G. C.). — Washington, D. C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. A., Harborne, J. B., Tomas-Barberan, F. A., 1987: Biflavonoids in the primitive monocotsIsophysis tasmanica andXerophyta plicata. — Phytochemistry26: 2553–2555.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1994: Differences in flavonoid patterns between genera within theVelloziaceae. — Phytochemistry36: 931–940.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Franklin de Melo, N., Guerra, M., Benko-Iseppon, A.M. et al. Cytogenetics and cytotaxonomy ofVelloziaceae . Pl Syst Evol 204, 257–273 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989209

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989209

Key words

Navigation