Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Family relationships of the enigmatic rosid generaBarbeya andDirachma from the Horn of Africa region

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Barbeya is a monotypic genus in the Horn of Africa and adjacent parts of Arabia. It is usually treated as the familyBarbeyaceae and regarded as an aberrant member ofUrticales. Dirachma, with one species on Socotra and one in Somalia, is usually treated as the familyDirachmaceae, inGeraniales, but a position inMalvales has also been suggested. Analyses of molecular data, from bothrbcL andtrnL-F, indicate thatBarbeya andDirachma are closely related inter se as well as toRhamnaceae andElaeagnaceae. In an analysis based on morphologyBarbeya groups withElaeagnaceae, andDirachma withRhamnaceae andUlmaceae. In a combined molecular and morphological analysisBarbeya is the sister group ofElaeagnaceae andDirachma is the sister group of the wholeBarbeya-Elaeagnaceae-Rhamnaceae clade. However, the support for these arrangements is weak and, rather than mergingBarbeyaceae withDirachmaceae as suggested by the molecular analysis or withElaeagnaceae as suggested by the morphological and combined analyses, it seems best to retain bothBarbeyaceae andDirachmaceae in their present circumscriptions, but in both cases in completely new positions in the angiosperm system. The results are compatible with a new circumscription ofRhamnales comprisingRhamnaceae, Elaeagnaceae, Dirachmaceae andBarbeyaceae.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Backlund, A., Bremer, K., 1998: To be or not to be — principles of classification and monotypic plant families. — Taxon (in press).

  • Balfour, I. B., 1884: Diagnoses plantarum novarum phanerogamarum socotrensium. Pars quarta (Supplementum). — Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh12: 402–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • - 1888: Botany of Socotra. — Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh31.

  • Barabe, D., Bergeron, Y., Vincent, G. A., 1982: Etude quantitative de la classification desHamamelididae. — Taxon31: 619–645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, G., Hooker, J. D., 1880: Genera plantarum,3(1). — London: Reeve.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, C. C., 1989: Systematics and phylogeny of theUrticales. — InCrane, P. R., Blackmore, S., (Eds): Evolution, systematics and fossil history of theHamamelidae,2, pp. 193–220. — Syst. Ass. Spec. Vol.40B. — Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boesewinkel, D., Bouman, F., 1997: Ovules and seeds ofDirachma socotrana (Dirachmaceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.205: 195–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouman, F., Boesewinkel, D., 1997: Ovules and seeds ofBarbeya with additional arguments for an urticalean affinity of theBarbeyaceae. — Acta Bot. Neerl.46: 255–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremer, B., Andreasen, K., Olsson, D., 1995: Subfamilial and tribal relationships in theRubiaceae based onrbcL sequence data. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.82: 383–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, M. W., & al., 1993: Phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid generbcL. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.80: 528–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corner, E. J. H., 1976: The seeds of dicotyledons,1 &2. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist, A., 1981: An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. — New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1988: The evolution and classification of flowering plants, 2nd edn. — New York: The New York Botanical Garden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, G., 1989: The last Dahlgrenogram. System of classification of the dicotyledons. — InKit Tan, (Ed.): TheDavis andHedge Festschrift, pp. 249–260. — Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, R., 1983: General aspects of angiosperm evolution and macrosystematics. — Nordic J. Bot.3: 119–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darnley Gibbs, R., 1974: Chemotaxonomy of flowering plants,1–4. — Montreal, London: McGill-Queen's University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickison, W. C., Sweitzer, E. M., 1970: The morphology and relationships ofBarbeya oleoides. — Amer. J. Bot.57: 468–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engler, A., 1897:Ulmaceae. — InEngler, A., Prantl, K., (Eds): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. Nachträge3(1). — Berlin: Borntraeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1936: Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien. — Berlin: Borntraeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esau, K., 1977: Anatomy of seed plants, 2nd edn. — New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J., 1985: Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. — Evolution39: 783–791.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friis, I., 1993:Barbeyaceae. — InKubitzki, K., (Ed.): The families and genera of vascular plants, pp. 141–142. — Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannasi, D. E., 1978: Generic relationships in theUlmaceae based on flavonoid chemistry. — Taxon27: 331–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1986: Phytochemical aspects of phylogeny inHamamelidae. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.73: 417–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, A., 1986: Classification, evolution, and phylogeny of the families of dicotyledons. — Smithsonian Contrib. Bot.58: 1–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegnauer, R., 1966: Chemotaxonomie der Pflanzen,4. — Basel, Stuttgart: Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1973: Chemotaxonomie der Pflanzen,6. — Basel, Stuttgart: Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, J., 1959: The families of flowering plants, 2nd edn.,1. — Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1964: The genera of flowering plants,1. — Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1969: Evolution and phylogeny of flowering plants. — London, New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1973: The families of flowering plants, 3rd edn.,1. — Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubitzki, K., 1993: Introduction. — InKubitzki, K., (Ed.): The families and genera of vascular plants,2, pp. 1–12. — Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, D. A., 1991:Dirachma somalensis D. A. Link sp. nov. A new species of a remarkable and highly endangered monogeneric family. — Bull. Jard. Bot. Belg.61: 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1993:Dirachmaceae. — InThulin, M., (Eds): Flora of Somalia,1, pp. 191–192. — Richmond: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1994:Dirachma Schweinf. (Dirachmaceae) a highly remarkable and endangered bispecific genus. — InSeyani, J. H., Chikuni, A. C., (Eds): Proceedings of the XIIIth plenary meeting of AETFAT, Zomba, Malawi, 2–11 April 1991, pp. 1229–1238. — Zomba: National Herbarium and Botanic Gardens of Malawi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melchior, H., 1964:Ulmaceae. — InMelchior, H., (Ed.):A. Engler's Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien, 12th edn,2: 52–54. — Berlin: Borntraeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, C. R., Chalk, L., 1950: Anatomy of the dicotyledons,1 &2. — Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polhill, R. M., 1966:Ulmaceae. — InHubbard, C. B. E., Milne-Redhead, E., (Eds): Flora of Tropical East Africa. — London, Tonbridge: Crown Agents for Oversea Governments and Administrations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rendle, A. B., 1916:Barbeyaceae. — InPrain, D., (Ed.): Flora of Tropical Africa,6(2), pp. 14–15. — London: Reeve.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweinfurth, G., 1891:Barbeya Schwf. gen. nov. Urticacearum. — Malpighia5: 332–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S., Morgan, D. R., Swensen, S. M., Mullin, B. C., Dowd, J. M., Martin, P. G., 1995: Chloroplast gene sequence data suggest a single origin of the predisposition for symbiotic nitrogen fixation in angiosperms. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA92: 2647–2651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suessenguth, K., 1953:Rhamnaceae. — InEngler, A., Prantl, K., (Eds): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 2nd edn.,20d: 7–173. — Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swensen, S. M., 1996: The evolution of actinorhizal symbioses: evidence for multiple origins of the symbiotic association. — Amer. J. Bot.83: 1503–1512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford, D. L., 1993: PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony. Version 3. 1. 1. Computer program. — Champaign, Illinois: Illinois Natural History Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taberlet, P., Geilly, L., Pautou, G., Bouvet, J., 1991: Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. — Pl. Molec. Biol.17: 1105–1109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takhtajan, A., 1966: Systema et phylogenia Magnoliophytorum. — Moscow: Nauka [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1980: Outline of the classification of flowering plants (Magnoliophyta). — Bot. Rev.46: 225–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1987: Systema Magnoliophytorum. — Leningrad: Nauka [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, R. F., 1973: The “Amentiferae” orHamamelidae as an artificial group: a summary statement. — Brittonia25: 395–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1976: A phylogenetic classification of theAngiospermae. — Evol. Biol.9: 35–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1983: Proposed new realignments in angiosperms. — Nordic J. Bot.3: 85–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1989:‘Hamamelidae’: A commentary. — InBlackmore, S., Crane, P. R., (Eds): Evolution, systematics and fossil history of theHamamelidae,1, pp. 9–16. — Syst. Ass. Spec. Vol.40A. — Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1992: Classification and geography of the flowering plants. — Bot. Rev.58: 225–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobe, H., Takahashi, M., 1990: Trichome and pollen morphology ofBarbeya (Barbeyaceae) and its relationships. — Taxon39: 561–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, J., 1963: Le genreNeillia (Rosaceae). — Adansonia3: 142–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, J. C., 1966: A dictionary of the flowering plants and ferns, 7th edn., revised byH. K. Airy Shaw. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yakovleva, O. V., 1994: The ultrastructure of mucilage cells in the leaf epidermis ofDirachma socotrana (Dirachmaceae). — Bot. Zhurn.79(5): 52–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zavada, M. S., Kim, M., 1996: Phylogenetic analysis ofUlmaceae. — Syst. Bot. Evol.200: 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Systematic Botany, Uppsala University, Villavägen 6, S-752 36, Uppsala, Sweden

    Mats Thulin, Birgitta Bremer & Jonas Niklasson

  2. Molecular Systematic Section, Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, TW9 3DS, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, UK

    James Richardson, Michael F. Fay & Mark W. Chase

Authors
  1. Mats Thulin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Birgitta Bremer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. James Richardson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jonas Niklasson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Michael F. Fay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mark W. Chase
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thulin, M., Bremer, B., Richardson, J. et al. Family relationships of the enigmatic rosid generaBarbeya andDirachma from the Horn of Africa region. Pl Syst Evol 213, 103–119 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988911

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988911

Key words

Search

Navigation