Skip to main content
Log in

Reward structures of academic disciplines

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examined the specific differences in the salary reward structures of eight clusters of academic disciplines included in Biglan's three-dimensional model of the academic profession. The sample consisted of 1.320 faculty at a large research university who responded to the Faculty Activity Analysis questionnaire requesting information on the amount of time they devoted each week to eleven categories of professional responsibility. These measures were used to predict faculty salaries in the eight discipline clusters. The results demonstrated wide variation in the reward structures of these discipline clusters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Biglan, A. The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1973a,57, 195–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biglan, A. Relationship between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1973b,57, 204–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressel, P. L. and Mayhew, L.Higher education as a field of study. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gnanadesikan, A.Methods for statistical data analysis of multivariate observations. New York: Wiley, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, W. C. and Francis, J. B. On the scholarly activities of higher educationists.Journal of Higher Education, 1973,44, 51–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G. E. and Stafford, F. P. Lifetime earnings in a professional labor market: Academic economists.Journal of Political Economy, 1974,82, 549–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D. A. Faculty salaries, promotions, and productivity at a large university.American Economic Review, 1973,63, 469–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemerer, F. R. and Baldridge, J. V.Unions on campus. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J. B. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical approach.Psychometrika, 1964,29, 28–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S.The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, E. C. and Lipset, S. M.The divided academy. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • OSIRIS III, Ann Arbor, Michigan: Institute for Social Research (Survey Research Center), University of Michigan, 1973.

  • Rao, C. R.Linear statistical inference and its application. New York: Wiley, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J. C. and Elton, C. F. Goal orientations of academic departments: A test of Biglan's model.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975,60, 580–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J. C. and Elton, C. F. Administrative roles of department chairmen. In J. C. Smart and J. R. Montgomery (eds.),Managing academic departments. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trow, M.Teachers and students. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuckman, H. P. and Hagemann, R. P. An analysis of the reward structure in two disciplines.Journal of Higher Education, 1976,47, 447–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. C. and Gaff, J. G.College professors and their impact on students. New York: Wiley, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smart, J.C., McLaughlin, G.W. Reward structures of academic disciplines. Res High Educ 8, 39–55 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985855

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985855

Key words

Navigation