Skip to main content

Is Cooperative Research Center Affiliation Amongst Academic Researchers Stratifying the Academy? The Impacts of Departmental Prestige, Career Trajectory, and Productivity on Center Affiliation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cooperative Research Centers and Technical Innovation
  • 1030 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter contribution to the edited volume acknowledges while much research is focused on the effectiveness of cooperative research centers at fulfilling their multiple missions related to research, education, and outreach, that little research has analyzed how centers can stratify academic researchers. Based on a representative sample of academic scientists and engineers working at research extensive universities, Xuhong Su and Gretchen Keneson find evidence that cooperative research centers are more likely to include faculty employed in prestigious departments and who are highly productive. The authors discuss the multiple, competing interpretations of these results (i.e., the merit-based vs. accumulative advantage explanations of the allocation of resources in academia). For complementary examinations, see the chapter by Coberly and Gray on job satisfaction amongst academic faculty participating in cooperative research centers and also the chapter by Garrett-Jones and colleagues on role strain amongst faculty in centers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The surveyed fields in this study are biology, computer science, mathematics, physics, chemistry, earth and atmospheric science, civil engineering, electrical engineering, chemical engineering, material engineering and mechanical engineering. Agriculture and Economics are among 13 fields defined by NSF, but excluded in this study.

  2. 2.

    See A rating of graduate program (Roose and Anderson 1970), An assessment of research doctorate programs in the United States (Jones et al. 1982a, b, c), and Research doctorate programs in the United States: continuity and change (Goldberger et al. 1995).

References

  • Allison PD, Long JS (1990) Departmental effects on scientific productivity. Am Sociol Rev 55(4):469–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison PD, Stewart JA (1974) Productivity differences among scientists: evidence for accumulative advantage. Am Sociol Rev 39(4):596–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison PD, Long JS, Krauze TK (1982) Cumulative advantage and inequality in science. Am Sociol Rev 47(5):615–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastedo MN, Gumport PJ (2003) Access to what? Mission differentiation and academic stratification in U.S. public higher education. High Educ 46(3):341–359. doi:10.1023/a:1025374011204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedeian AG, Feild HS (1980) Academic stratification in graduate management programs: departmental prestige and faculty hiring patterns. J Manage 6(2):99–115. doi:10.1177/014920638000600201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blossfeld H-P, Rohwer GT (1995) Techniques of event history modeling: new approaches to causal analysis. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumberg RL (1984) A general theory of gender stratification. Sociol Theor 2:23–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boardman C, Bozeman B (2007) Role strain in university research centers. J High Educ 78(4):430–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boardman C, Ponomariov B (2007) Reward systems and NSF university research centers: the impact of tenure on university scientists’ valuation of applied and commercially relevant research. J High Educ 78(1):51–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burris V (2004) The academic caste system: prestige hierarchies in PhD exchange networks. Am Sociol Rev 69(2):239–264. doi:10.1177/000312240406900205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devine M, James T, Adams T (1987) Government supported industry-university research centers: issues for successful technology transfer. J Technol Transf 12(1):27–37. doi:10.1007/bf02371360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz J, Bozeman B (2005) Academic careers, patents, and productivity: industry experience as scientific and technical human capital. Res Policy 34(3):349–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz J, Chompalov I, Bozeman B, Lane E, Park J (2000) Using the curriculum vita to study the career paths of scientists and engineers: an exploratory assessment. Scientometrics 49(3):419–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM (2009) Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys : the tailored design method (3rd ed.). Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley & Sons.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaughan M, Bozeman B (2002) Using curriculum vitae to compare some impacts of NSF research grants with research center funding. Res Eval 11(1):17–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberger ML, Maher BA, Flattau PE, National Research Council (U.S.), Committee for the Study of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States, Conference Board of the Associated Research Councils, National Research Council (U.S.), Office of Scientific and Engineering Personnel, Studies and Surveys Unit (1995) Research-doctorate programs in the United States: continuity and change. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones LV, Lindzey G, Coggeshall PE (1982a) An assessment of research-doctorate programs in the United States—mathematical & physical sciences. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones LV, Lindzey G, Coggeshall PE (1982b) An assessment of research-doctorate programs in the United States—biological sciences. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones LV, Lindzey G, Coggeshall PE (1982c) An assessment of research-doctorate programs in the United States: engineering. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin M-W, Bozeman B (2006) Researchers’ industry experience and productivity in university–industry research centers: a “scientific and technical human capital” explanation. J Technol Transf 31(2):269–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link AN, Siegel DS, Bozeman B (2007) An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal university technology transfer. Ind Corp Change 16(4):641–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long JS, Fox MF (1995) Scientific careers: universalism and particularism. Annu Rev Sociol 21(1):45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long JS, McGinnis R (1981) Organizational context and scientific productivity. Am Sociol Rev 46(4):422–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long JS, Allison PD, McGinnis R (1993) Rank advancement in academic careers: sex differences and the effects of productivity. Am Sociol Rev 58(5):703–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton R (1968) The Matthew effect in science. Science 159(3810):56–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton R (1973) The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton R (1988) The matthew effect in science, II: cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. Isis 79(4):606–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponomariov B, Boardman C (2010) Influencing scientists’ collaboration and productivity patterns through new institutions: university research centers and scientific and technical human capital. Res Policy 39(5):613–624. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roose KD, Anderson CJ (1970) A rating of graduate programs. American Council on Education, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Santoro MD, Chakrabarti AK (1999) Building industry–university research centers: some strategic considerations. Int J Manage Rev 1(3):225–244. doi:10.1111/1468-2370.00014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santoro MD, Gopalakrishnan S (2001) Relationship dynamics between university research centers and industrial firms: their impact on technology transfer activities. J Technol Transf 26(1):163–171. doi:10.1023/a:1007804816426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su X (2011) Postdoctoral training, departmental prestige and scientists’ research productivity. J Technol Transf 36(3):275–291. doi:10.1007/s10961-009-9133-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weeber S (2006) Elite versus mass sociology: an elaboration on Sociology’s Academic Caste System. Am Sociol 37(4):50–67. doi:10.1007/bf02915067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman H (1970) Stratification in American science. Sociol Inq 40(2):235–257. doi:10.1111/j.1475-682X.1970.tb01010.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The data on which this research is based was supported by National Science Foundation CAREER grant REC 0447878/0710836, “University Determinants of Women’s Academic Career Success” (Monica Gaughan, Principal Investigator) and NSF grant SBR 9818229, “Assessing R and D Projects’ Impacts on Scientific and Technical Human Capital Development” (Barry Bozeman, Principal Investigator). The views reported here do not necessarily reflect those of National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xuhong Su .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Su, X., Keneson, G. (2013). Is Cooperative Research Center Affiliation Amongst Academic Researchers Stratifying the Academy? The Impacts of Departmental Prestige, Career Trajectory, and Productivity on Center Affiliation. In: Boardman, C., Gray, D., Rivers, D. (eds) Cooperative Research Centers and Technical Innovation. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4388-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics