Abstract
Attempts to distinguish women who have experienced courtship violence from those who have not based on their sex role characteristics have been unsuccessful. A possible explanation for this failure is that sex roles may better explain a woman's response to violence than predict her victimization. This study examined the impact of a woman's sex role attributes (masculinity) and attitudes (modernity) on the length of time she remained with a former premarital partner after his first use of violence against her. Masculinity was not related to how long a woman stayed with a violent partner. The more modern a woman's sex role attitudes, the shorter the time she remained in the violent relationship. A further descriptive analysis suggested that this relationship may hold only for women who had experienced just one episode of violence. The implications of these findings are discussed, along with the methodological advances and limitations of this study. Finally, recommendations are made for future research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ball, D., McKenry, P. C., and Price-Bonham, S. (1983). Use of repeated-measures designs in family research.J. Marr. Fam. 45: 885–896.
Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 42: 155–162.
Bernard, J. L., and Bernard, M. L. (1984). The abusive male seeking treatment: Jekyll and Hyde.Family Relat. 33: 543–547.
Bernard, J. L., Bernard, S. L., and Bernard, M. L. (1985). Courtship violence and sex-typing.Family Relat. 34: 573–576.
Bernard, M. L., and Bernard, J. L. (1983). Violent intimacy: The family as a model for love relationships.Fam. Relat. 33: 283–286.
Billingham, R. E. (1987). Courtship violence: The patterns of conflict resolution strategies across seven levels of emotional commitment. Fam. Relat. 36: 283–289.
DeMaris, A. (1987). The efficacy of a spouse abuse model in accounting for courtship violence.J. Fam. Issues. 8: 291–305.
Flynn, C. P. (1987). Relationship violence: A model for family professionals.Fam. Relat. 36: 295–299.
Makepeace, J. M. (1987). Social factor and victim-offender differences in courtship violence.Fam. Relat. 35: 383–388.
Martin, D. (1981).Battered Wives, Volcano Press, San Francisco.
Rosenbaum, A., and O'Leary, K. D. (1981). Marital violence: Characteristics of abusive couples.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 49: 63–71.
Roy, M. (1977).Battered Women: A Psychosociological Study of Domestic Violence, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
Rubin, Z. (1970). Measurement of romantic love.J. Personal. Social Psychol. 16: 265–273.
Scanzoni, J. H. (1975).Sex Roles, Life Styles, and Childbearing, Free Press, New York.
Scanzoni, J. H., and Fox, G. L. (1980). Sex roles, family and society: The seventies and beyond.J. Marr. Fam. 42: 20–33.
Sigelman, C. K., Berry, C. J., and Wiles, K. A. (1984). Violence in college students' dating relationships.J. Appl. Social Psychol. 5: 530–548.
Spence, J. T., and Helmreich, R. L. (1978).Masculinity and Femininity: Their Psychological Dimensions, Correlates, and Antecedents, University of Texas Press, Austin, Tex.
Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., and Stapp, J. (1973). A short version of the Attitudes toward Women Scale (AWS).Bull. Psychonomic Soc. 2: 219–220.
Stets, J. E., and Pirog-Good, M. A. (1987). Violence in dating relationships.Social Psychological Quart. 50: 237–246.
Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales.J. Marr. Fam. 41: 75–88.
Szinovacz, M. E. (1983). Using couple data as a methodological tool: The case of marital violence.J. Marr. Fam. 45: 633–644.
Walker, L. E. (1979).The Battered Woman, Harper and Row, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Flynn, C.P. Sex roles and women's response to courtship violence. J Fam Viol 5, 83–94 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00979140
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00979140