Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influence of patriarchal sex-role attitudes on perpetration of dating violence

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Male-dominant and male-controlling patriarchal ideology justifies males possessing more power and authority, using power to control women, and exerting violence when their partner shows disobedience; this ideology is increasingly recognized as an important factor explaining dating violence perpetrated by men. The present study investigated the relationship between patriarchal sex-role attitudes and dating violence perpetration, as well as the mediating influence of acceptance toward dating violence. Participants were 622 Korean male university students. First, patriarchal sex-role attitudes were found to influence acceptance toward dating violence. Second, acceptance toward dating violence had an influence on the perpetration of all three subtypes of dating violence (i.e., psychological, physical, and sexual violence). Third, patriarchal sex-role attitudes directly affected the perpetration of psychological dating violence. Fourth, the level of acceptance toward dating violence mediated the relationship between traditional sex-role attitudes and the perpetration of all three subtypes of dating violence. The findings of the study underscore the importance of sex-role attitudes among young adults. Significant implications for school counselors as well as dating violence prevention program developers are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahn, G. Y. R. (2006). Research review about psycho-social risk markers related to dating violence. Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 11, 709–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baek, J. (2009). The impact of demographic variables on family value orientations and gender role attitudes: The international comparison. Journal of Korean Home Management Association, 27, 239–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berke, D. S., Sloan, C. A., Parrott, D., & Zeichner, A. (2012). Effects of female gender role and gender norm conformity on aggression in men: Does positive masculinity reduce the risk? Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 13(4), 367–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H., & Cho, H. (2001). The prevalence and risk factors of dating violence among University students. Korean Journal of Family Social Work, 8, 179–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16–29.

  • Exner-Cortens, D., Eckenrode, J., & Rothman, E. (2013). Longitudinal associations between teen dating violence victimization and adverse health outcomes. Pediatrics, 131, 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-1029.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Foo, L., & Margolin, G. (1995). A multivariate investigation of dating aggression. Journal of Family Violence, 10, 351–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02110711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foshee VA, Linder F, MacDougall JE, Bangdiwala S. (2001). Gender differences in the longitudinal predictors of adolescent dating violence. Preventive Medicine. 32:128–141. 

  • Foshee, V. A., Bauman, K. E., Ennett, S. T., Suchindran, C., Benefield, T., & Linder, G. F. (2005). Assessing the effects of the dating violence prevention program “Safe Dates” using random coefficient regression modelling. Prevention Science, 6, 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-005-0007-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, S. E., Chesir-Teran, D., & McFaul, D. (2008). Profiles and correlates of relational aggression in young adult’s romantic relationships. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-007-9255-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, H. M., & Foshee, V. (1997). Adolescent dating violence: Differences between one-sided and mutually violent profiles. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 126–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626097012001008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmreich, R. L., & Spence, J. T. (1978). The Work and Family Orientation Questionnaire: An objective instrument to assess components of achievement motivation and attitudes toward family and career. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documments in Psychology, 8, 1–35.

  • Hoang, T.-A., Quach, T. T., & Tran, T. T. (2013). ‘Because I am a man, I should be gentle to my wife and my children’: positive masculinity to stop gender-based violence in a coastal district in Vietnam. Gender and Development, 21(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2013.767511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, M. K., & Espelage, D. L. (2005). Social support as a moderator between dating violence victimization and depression/anxiety among African American and Caucasian adolescents. School Psychology Review, 34, 309–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.

  • Jung, M., & Jo, H. (2009). The effects of intolerance of uncertainty on life satisfaction: Stress coping strategies as a mediator. The Korea Journal of Youth Counselling, 17, 64–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, S., Lim, C., & Lee, M. (2011). The effects of prejudice on dating violence and the mediating effects of violence acceptability and relationship conflict. Social Science Research, 27, 127–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D. K. (2009). The study of relationship between family violence and dating violence, and mediation effect of the acceptability of violence. Korean Journal of Youth Studies, 16, 135–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. (2010). A study of variation of control variables on adolescents’ gender-role attitudes: Focusing on gender difference. Korean Journal of Youth Studies, 21, 97–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y., & Kim, H. (2000). A study on physical and psychological violence in dating among male and female adolescents. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education, 12, 183–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. Y., Lee, H. J., & Song, A. Y. (2007). A study on the influence of the experience of family violence and the acceptability of violence on the male adolescent’s sexual assault. Korean Journal of Social Welfare Research, 17, 27–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. Y., Song, A. Y., & Han, S. (2010). An overlapping experience of domestic violence and children’s depression and delinquent behaviors. Korean Journal of Youth Studies, 17, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korean Institute of Criminology. (2015). Violence against women: Focused on violence by the intimate partner. Report No. 15-AA-13.

  • Korean National Police Agency. (2016). Research on the current state of dating violence. Seoul: Korean National Police Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwesiga, E., Bell, M. P., Pattie, M., & Moe, A. M. (2007). Exploring the literature on relationships between gender roles, intimate partner violence, occupational status, and organizational benefits. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 312–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260506295381.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. Y., & Oh, K. J. (2007). The effect of witnessing marital violence in childhood on dating violence among college students. The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, 12, 433–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichte, E. L., & McCloskey, L. A. (2004). The effects of childhood exposure to marital violence on adolescent gender-role beliefs and dating violence. Psychology of Woman Quarterly, 28, 344–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murnen, S. K., Wright, C., & Kaluzny, G. (2002). If “boys will be boys,” then girls will be victims? A meta-analytic review of the research that relates masculine ideology to sexual aggression. Sex Roles, 46, 359–375. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020488928736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, D. S., & O'LEARY, K. D. (1996). Aggression between heterosexual dating partners. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 11, 519–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sears, H. A., Byers, E. S., & Price, E. L. (2007). The co-occurrence of adolescent boys’ and girls’ use of psychologically, physically, and sexually abusive behaviors in their dating relationships. Journal of Adolescence, 30, 487–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.05.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shelby, A. K., & Brenda, J. L. (2007). Dating violence victimization, relationship satisfaction, mental health problems, and acceptability of violence: A comparison of men and women. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 367–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, A. C. T., Chiu, M. Y. L., & Gao, J. (2012). Predictors of dating violence among Chinese adolescents: The role of gender-role beliefs and justification of violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(6), 1066–1089.

  • Shin, S., & Kim, Y. S. (2016). How does college student’s experience of domestic violence victimization affect victimization of dating violence? Korean Journal of Victimology, 24, 5–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. C. (1980). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa.

  • Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2). Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251396017003001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suh, K. H., Kim, B. J., Jeong, G. C., & Kim, S. S. (2001). Predictors of dating violence among college students. Korean Academic Society of Womens Health, 2, 75–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, D. A., & Feiring, C. (2000). Dating violence through the lens of adolescent romantic relationships. Child Maltreatment, 5, 360–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559500005004007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, J., Yang, S. Y., & Park, B. K. (2012). The influence of domestic violence, patriarchal gender role attitude, and inferiority complex on acceptability of college dating violence. Korean Journal of Youth Studies, 19, 79–107.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2017S1A5A2A01025404).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyulee Shin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee (Hankuk University of Foreign Studies) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

You, S., Shin, K. Influence of patriarchal sex-role attitudes on perpetration of dating violence. Curr Psychol 41, 943–948 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00632-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00632-4

Keywords

Navigation