Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring grief: A short version of the perinatal grief scale

  • Published:
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite a considerable number of studies, there are two major drawbacks in the literature on grief and bereavement. One is a lack of adequate and generally agreed upon measures for assessing grief. The second is a lack of ability to predict from existing measures the likelihood of what has been termed “chronic” or “pathological” grief reactions. This paper reports the results of the development of a bereavement measure for the study of perinatal loss which attempts to address these gaps. The measure is specific to a pregnancy-related loss, although it has the potential for adaptation to use for other types of loss. Analysis of responses from 138 women has resulted in the reduction of the original measure from 104 to a more manageable and almost equally comprehensive and reliable 33 items. In addition, a factor analysis has produced three factors, two of which indicate the possibility for longer-term and more severe grief reactions. Because of its sound psychometric qualities and interesting factor structure, the measure shows promise of being useful for both research and clinical purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benfield, G., Leib, S., & Volman, J. (1978). Grief response of parents to neonatal death and parent participation in deciding care.Pediatrics, 62, 171–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, C. G., Blanchard, E. B., & Becker, J. V. (1976). The young widow: Depressive symptomatology throughout the grief process.Psychiatry, 39, 384–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugen, L. A. (1977). Human grief: A model for prediction and intervention.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 42, 196–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. (1963).Experimental nd Quasi-Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Chicago: Rand McNally College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, P. J., Desmarais, L., & Winokur, G. (1968). A Study of normal bereavement.American Journal of Psychiatry, 125, 168–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullberg, J. (1971). Mental reactions of women to perinatal death.Psychosomatic Medicine in Obstetrics and Gyneocology, 326–329.

  • Derogatis, L. R., Rickels, K., & Rock, A. F. (1976). The SCL-90 and MMPI: A stop in the validation of a new self-report scale,British Journal of Psychiatry, 128, 280–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, G. C., Standish, E., & Baum, J. D. (1982). Support after perinatal death: A study of support and counseling after perinatal bereavement.British Medical Journal, 285, 1475–1479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1917). Mourning and melancholia.The Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 14). New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, S., & Ostfeld, A. (1977). An epidemiological review of the mortality of bereavement.Psychosomatic Medicine, 39, 344–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennell, J. H., Slyter, H., & Klaus, M. H. (1970). The mourning response of parents to the death of a newborn infant.New England Journal of Medicine, 283, 344–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkley-Best, E. (1981). Grief in response to prenatal loss: An argument for the earlier maternal attachment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Gainesville: University of Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkley-Best, E., & Kellner, K. (1982). The forgotten grief: A review of the psychology of still-birth.American Journal of Orthopsychology, 52, 420–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterweis, M., Solomon, F., & Green, M. (Eds.), (1984).Bereavement: Reactions, Consequences, and Care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkes, C. M., & Weiss, R. S. (1983).Recovery from Bereavement. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peppers, L. G., & Knapp, R. J. (1980). Maternal reactions to involuntary fetal/infant death.Psychiatry, 43, 155–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, C. M., Mauger, P. A., & Strong, P. N. (1985). A Manual forThe Grief Experience Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toedter, L., Lasker, J., & Alhadeff, J. (1988). The Perinatal Grief Scale: Development and initial validation.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 58, 435–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Videka-Sherman, L., & Lieberman, M. (1985). The effects of self-help and psychotherapy intervention on child loss: The limits of recovery.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 55: 70–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, W. V., & Polak, P. (1979). Follow-up research in primary prevention: A model of adjustment in acute grief.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 35, 35–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zisook, S., Devaul, R. A., & Click, M. A. (1982). Measuring symptoms of grief and bereavement.American Journal of Psychiatry, 139, 1590–1593.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was funded by National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Grant R01 H18431-04, with additional assistance from the Center for Social Research at Lehigh University. Dr. Potvin is supported by the Quebec Health Research Fund.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Potvin, L., Lasker, J. & Toedter, L. Measuring grief: A short version of the perinatal grief scale. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 11, 29–45 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00962697

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00962697

Key words

Navigation