Skip to main content
Log in

A bridge between cultures: Linked ethnographic-empirical methodology for culture anchored research

  • Published:
American Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

Relatively little research in community psychology has explicitly focused on groups whose world views, values, and practices diverge from mainstream North American and social science culture. Furthermore, when research does include members of subcultural groups, the same research methodologies used to stydy mainstream populations tend to be employed. In the current article, it is proposed that a linked ethnographic—empirical methodology is critical for culturally anchored research of rarely studied subcultures which differ markedly form the dominant culture. The use of a linked ethnographic—empirical methodology in the study of a nontraditional religious subculture is described, and the study's primary findings summarized. Respective and combined contributions of the ethnographic and empirical (i.e., quantitative) research components in seven key areas are discussed: (a) selection of phenomenon to study; (b) generation of hypotheses; (c) culturally anchored measure development; (d) sampling; (e) analyses; (f) interpretation of findings; and (g) social action. Limitations of the linked methodology are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berry, J. W. (1980). Introduction to Methodology. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.),Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Vol. 2. Methodology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (1989).The research act (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetterman, D. M. (1989).Ethnography: Step by step (Vol. 17, Applied Social Research Methods Series). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1973).The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982).In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L.(1967).The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helms, J. E. (1992). Why there is no study of cultural equivalence in standardized cognitive ability testing.American Psychologist, 47, 1083–1101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, G. S. (1991). Culture tales: A narrative approach to thinking, cross-cultural psychology, and psychotherapy.American Psychologist, 46, 187–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahoda, G. (1982).Psychology and anthropology: A Psychological perspective. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1982).The varieties of religious experience. London: Penguin. (Original work published 1902).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, D. L. (1982). The esoteric community: An ethnographic investigation of the cultic milieu.Urban Life, 10, 383–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, D. L. (1989).Participant observation: A methodology for human studies (Vol. 15, Applied Social Research Methods Series). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jules-Rosette, B. (1975).African apostles. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagitcibasi, C., & Berry, J. W. (1983). Cross-cultural psychology: Current research and trends.Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 493–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leary, T. (1957).Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Ronald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, M., & Perkins, D. V. (1987).Principles of community psychology: Perspectives and applications. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985).Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maton, K. I. (1981).Empowerment in a religious setting: An exploratory study. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maton, K. I. (1985). Economic sharing among members of a religious fellowship: Patterns and psychological correlates. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maton, K. I. (1989a). The stress-buffering role of spiritual support: Cross-sectional and prospective investigations.Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 28, 310–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maton, K. I. (1989b). Community settings as buffers of life stress? Highly supportive churches, mutual help groups, and senior centers.American Journal of Community Psychology, 17, 203–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maton, K. I. (in press). Religion as a community resource for well-being: Prevention, healing, and empowerment pathways.Journal of Social Issues.

  • Maton, K. I., & Pargament, K. I. (1987). Roles of religion in prevention and promotion. In L. A. Jason, R. D. Felner, R. Hess, & J. N. Moritsugu (Eds.),Prevention: Toward a multidisciplinary approach (pp. 161–206). New York: Haworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maton, K. I., & Pargament, K. I. (Eds.). (1991).Religion and prevention in mental health: Community intervention. New York: Haworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maton, K. I., & Rappaport, J. (1984). Empowerment in a religious setting: A multivariate investigation.Prevention in Human Services, 3, 37–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peshkin, A. (1986).God's choice: The total world of a fundamentalist Christian school. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, J., & Simkins, R. (1991). Healing and empowering through community narrative. In K. I. Maton & K. I. Pargament (Eds.),Religion and prevention in mental health: Community intervention (pp. 29–50). New York: Haworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, J. D. (1974).Introduction to sociology. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segall, M. H., Dasen, P. R., Berry, J. W., & Poortinga, Y. H. (1990).Human behavior in global perspective: An introduction to cross-cultural psychology. New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, E. (1983). Unexamined premises of social problem-solving. In E. Seidman (Ed.),Handbook of social intervention. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serpell, R. (1990). Audience, culture and psychological explanation: A reformulation of the emic-etic problem in cross-cultural psychology.The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 12, 99–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shweder, R. A. (1990). Cultural psychology, what is it? In J. W. Stigler, R. A. Shweder, & G. Herdt (Eds.).Cultural psychology: Essays on comparative human development (pp. 1–43). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter-Defoe, D. T., Nakagawa, K., Takanishi, R., & Johnson, D. J. (1990). Toward cultural/ecological perspectives on schooling and achievement in African- and Asian-American children.Child Development, 61, 363–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990).Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trend, M. G. (1978). On the reconciliation of qualitative and quantitative analyses: A case study.Human Organization, 37, 345–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, T. C. (1972).The analysis of subjective culture. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vega, W. A. (1987). Theoretical and pragmatic implications of cultural diversity for community research.American Journal of Community Psychology, 20, 375–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, H. (1987).Renunciation and reformulation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. D. (1974).Community in a black Pentecostal church: An anthropological study. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The author thanks Julian Rappaport, Chris Murphy, Robert Serpell, three anonymous reviewers, and the editors of the special issue for their valuable feedback.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maton, K.I. A bridge between cultures: Linked ethnographic-empirical methodology for culture anchored research. Am J Commun Psychol 21, 747–773 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00942246

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00942246

Key words

Navigation