Skip to main content
Log in

The development of an instrument to measure neighborhood cohesion

  • Published:
American Journal of Community Psychology

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Ahlbrandt, R. S. (1984).Neighborhoods, people, and community. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, R. G. (1968).Ecological psychology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartko, J. J. (1976). On various intraclass reliability coefficients.Psychological Bulletin, 83, 762–765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, B., & Kasarda, J. D. (1977).Contemporary urban ecology. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckner, J. C. (1986). The development of an instrument and procedure to assess the cohesiveness of neighborhoods.Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 2669B-2670B. (University Microfilms No. 86-20. 752)

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkhardt, J. E., & Wozny, M. C. (1984). Comparative assessment of selected models of community cohesion.Transportation Quarterly, 38, 375–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplow, T., & Forman, R. (1950). Neighborhood interaction in a homogenous community.American Sociological Review, 15, 357–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, D. (1968). The nature of group cohesiveness. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.),Group dynamics: Research and theory (3rd. ed., pp. 91–109). New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, D., & Zander, A. (1960). Group cohesiveness: Introduction. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.),Group dynamics: Research and theory (2nd. ed., pp. 69–94). New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devereux, E. C. (1960). Neighborhood and community participation.Journal of Social Issues, 16, 64–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doolittle, R. J., & MacDonald, D. (1978). Communication and sense of community in a metropolitan neighborhood: A factor analytic examination.Communication Quarterly, 26,2–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebel, R. L. (1951). Estimation of the reliability of ratings.Psychometrika, 16, 407–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, R. R., & Dillman, D. A. (1979). The influence of community attachment on geographic mobility.Rural Sociology, 44, 345–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fessler, D. (1962). The development of a scale for measuring community solidarity.Rural Sociology, 17, 144–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, C. S. (1982).To dwell among friends. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, J. (1957). Some determinants, manifestations, and effects of cohesiveness in therapy groups.International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 7, 53–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, T. J. (1981). Psychological sense of community: Measurement and application.Human Relations, 34, 780–818.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, N., & Martin, W. E. (1952). On group cohesiveness.American Journal of Sociology, 57, 546–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T. (1971).Aggregation and disaggregation in sociology. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, J. J. (1981). Group cohesion and the regulation of self-esteem. In H. Kellerman (Ed.),Group cohesion: Theoretical and clinical perspectives (pp. 255–267). New York: Grune & Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartnagel, T. F. (1979). The perception and fear of crime: Implications for neighborhood cohesion, social activity, and community affect.Social Forces, 58, 176–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, K., Price, R. H., Reinharz, S., Riger, S., & Wandersman, A. (1984).Psychology and community change (2nd ed.). Homewood, IL: Dorsey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmstadter, G. C. (1964).Principles of psychological measurement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, A. (1975). The loss of community: An empirical test through replication.American Sociological Review, 40, 537–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, L. R. (1982). Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement.Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 219–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, L. R., & Jones, A. P. (1974). Organizational climate: A review of theory and research.Psychological Bulletin, 81, 1096–1112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, W. F., & Slocum, J. W. (1984). Collective climate: Agreement as a basis for defining aggregate climates in organizations.Academy of Management Journal, 27, 721–742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, S. (1968).The urban neighborhood. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellerman, H. (Ed.). (1981).Group cohesion: Theoretical and clinical perspectives, New York: Grune & Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A., & La Voie, L. (1985). Separating individual and group effects.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 339–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerlinger, F. N. (1964).Foundations of behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Key, W. H. (1965). Urbanism and neighboring.Sociological Quarterly, 6, 379–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Libo, L. W. (1953).Measuring group cohesiveness. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litwak, E. (1960). Reference group theory, bureaucratic career, and neighborhood primary group cohesion.Sociometry, 23, 72–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litwak, E. (1961). Voluntary associations and neighborhood cohesion.American Sociological Review, 26, 258–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, P. H. (1954). The concept of neighborliness.American Journal of Sociology, 60, 163–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory.Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 6–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. G. (1978).Living systems. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos, R. H. (1974).The social climate scales: An overview. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos, R. H. (1976).The human context: Environmental determinants of behavior. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plutchik, R. (1981). Group cohesion in a psychoevolutionary context. In H. Kellerman (Ed.),Group cohesion: Theoretical and clinical perspectives (pp. 133–146). New York: Grune & Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riger, S., & Lavrakas, P. J. (1981). Community ties: Patterns of attachment and social interaction in urban neighborhoods.American Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 55–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, S. (1974).The psychological sense of community: Prospects for a community psychology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seashore, S. E. (1954).Group cohesiveness in the industrial work group. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlation: Uses in assessing rater reliability.Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. A. (1975). Measuring neighborhood cohesion: A review and some suggestions.Human Ecology, 3, 143–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trickett, E. J., Kelly, J. G., & Todd, D. M. (1972). The social environment of the high school: Guidelines for individual change and organizational redevelopment. In S. G. Golann & C. Eisdorfer (Eds.),Handbook of community mental health (pp. 331–406). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger, D. G., & Wandersman, A. (1983). Neighboring and its role in block organizations: An exploratory report.American Journal of Community Psychology, 11, 291–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger, D. G., & Wandersman, A. (1985). The importance of neighbors: The social, cognitive, and affective components of neighboring.American Journal of Community Psychology, 13, 139–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, T. A., & Trickett, E. J. (1983). Preventive interventions and the human context: Ecological approaches to environmental assessment and change. In R. D. Felner, L. A. Jason, J. N. Moritsugu, & S. S. Farber (Eds.),Preventive psychology: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 67–86). New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallin, P. (1953). A Guttman scale for measuring women's neighborliness.American Journal of Sociology, 59, 243–246.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This article is based on a dissertation submitted to the Department of Psychology at the University of Maryland-College Park in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the doctor of philosophy degree. The author is grateful in particular to Edison Trickett and to the other members of his dissertation committee composed of Robert Hirzel, Donald Klein, Katherine Klein, and Robert Steele. The author expresses appreciation to Elizabeth Buckner, Jane Cousins, Jerry Zisserson, Harold Perl, Debbie Dolan, Rosemarie Ciccarelly, Barbara Van Dahlen, and Michael Genhart for their assistance. The thoughtful comments of the annoymous reviewers are appreciated. Computer support was provided by the Computer Science Center, University of Maryland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buckner, J.C. The development of an instrument to measure neighborhood cohesion. Am J Commun Psychol 16, 771–791 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00930892

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00930892

Keywords

Navigation