Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of spelling-to-sound regularity on naming in French

  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In two experiments the naming task was used to investigate the effect of spelling-to-sound regularity on performance for French words varying in frequency of usage. In both experiments the results showed a significant effect of regularity on naming latencies. Contrary to what has been found in previous experiments using English stimuli, the regularity effect did not vary as a function of word frequency. However, in both experiments significantly more errors, and specifically regularisation errors, were observed with low-frequency irregular words. Several possible interpretations of this atypical pattern of results are discussed. An additional observation was that the regularity effect, both on naming latencies and on error rates, and independently of frequency of use, was limited to the irregular words in which the idiosyncratic orthographic segment was either in initial or in medial position in the word.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews, S. (1982). Phonological recoding: Is the regularity effect consistent?Memory & Cognition, 10, 565–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backman, J., Bruck, M., Hébert, M., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1984). Acquisiton and use of spelling-sound correspondences in reading.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 114–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balota, D. A., Boland, J. E., & Shields, L. W. (1989). Priming in pronunciation: Beyond pattern recognition and onset latency.Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 14–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. D. A. (1987). Resolving inconsistency: A computational model of word naming.Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J., Davies, P., & Richman, B. (1971).The American heritage word frequency book. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catach, N. (1984).La phonétisation automatique du français. Paris: Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G.Underwood (Ed.),Strategies of information processing (pp. 151–216). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S.Dornić (Ed.),Attention and performance (Vol. VI, pp. 535–555). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Content, A., & Radeau, M. (1988). Données statistiques sur la structure orthographique du français.Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 8, 399–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R., Katz, L., & Bentin, S. (1987). Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: A multilingual comparison.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 104–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gak, V. G. (1976).L'orthographe du français. Paris: SELAF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, P. R., Hanna, J. S., Hodges, R. E., & Rudorf, E. H. (1966).Phoneme-grapheme correspondences as cues to spelling improvement. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, L. (1982).Orthography and word recognition in reading. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, L., & Feldman, L. B. (1983). Relation between pronunciation and recognition of printed words in deep and shallow orthographies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 9,157–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, J., & Marcel, T. (1981). One process, not two, in reading aloud: Lexical analogies do the work of non-lexical rules.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33 A, 397–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imbs, P. (1971).Études statistiques sur le vocabulaire français. Dictionnaire des fréquences. Vocabulaire littéraire des XIXe et XXe siècles. Centre de recherche pour un Trésor de la langue française (CNRS), Nancy. Paris: Librairie Marcel Didier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukatela, G., Popadié, D., Ognjenovié, P., & Turvey, M. T. (1980). Lexical decision in a phonologically shallow orthograpphy.Memory & Cognition, 8, 124–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcel, T. (1980). Surface dyslexia and beginning reading: A revised hypothesis of the pronunciation of print and its impairments. In M.Coltheart, K.Patterson, & J. C.Marshall (Eds.), Deep dyslexia (pp. 227–258). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paap, K. R., McDonald, J. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W., & Noel, R. W. (1987). Frequency and pronounceability in visually presented naming and lexical decision tasks. In M.Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance: Vol. XII. The Psychology of Reading (pp. 221–243). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, K. E. (1982). The relation between reading and phonological coding: Further neuropsychological observations. In A. W.Ellis (Ed.), Normality and pathology in cognitive functions (pp. 77–111). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, K. E., & Morton, J. (1985). From orthography to phonology: An attempt at an old interpretation. In K. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.),Surface dyslexia: Neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading (pp. 335–359). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peereman, R. (1989). Représentations phonologiques dans la prononciation et l'identification des mots écrits alphabétiquement. Université Libre de Bruxelles: Unpublished doctoral thesis.

  • Rosson, M. B. (1985). The interaction of pronunciation rules and lexical representations in reading aloud.Memory & Cognition, 13, 90–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidenberg, M. (1985). The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems.Cognition, 19, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidenberg, M., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.Psychological Review, 96, 523–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidenberg, M., Waters, G., Barnes, M., & Tanenhaus, M. (1984). When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition?Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 383–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shallice, T., & McCarthy, R. (1985). Phonological reading: From patterns of impairment to possible procedures. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.),Surface dyslexia: Neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading (pp. 361–397). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taraban, R., & McClelland, J. L. (1987). Conspiracy effects in word pronunciation.Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 608–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Véronis, J. (1988). From sound to spelling in French: Simulation on a computer.European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology, 8, 315–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, G., & Seidenberg, M. (1985). Spelling-sound effects in reading: Time-course and decision criteria.Memory & Cognition, 13, 557–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, G., Seidenberg, M., & Bruck, M. (1984). Children's and adults' use of spelling-sound information in three reading tasks.Memory & Cognition, 12, 293–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijk, A. (1966).Rules of pronunciation for the English language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Content, A. The effect of spelling-to-sound regularity on naming in French. Psychol. Res 53, 3–12 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00867327

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00867327

Keywords

Navigation