Summary
A new approach has been developed for determining consistent satellite-tracking data weights in solutions for the satellite-only gravitational models. The method employs subset least-squares solutions of the satellite data contained within the complete solution and requires that the differences of the parameters of subset solutions and the complete solution to be in agreement with their error estimates by adjusting the data weights. GEM-T2 model was recently computed and adjusted through a direct application of this method. The estimated data weights are markedly smaller than the weights implied by the formal uncertainties of the measurements. Orbital arc tests as well as surface gravity comparisons show significant improvements for solutions when more realistic data weighting is achieved.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brown RD (1988) Characterization of the GEOS-1 Laser Ranging Residuals (1976–1980), STX Contract Report 8801.
Grafarend EW, Schaffrin B (1979) Variance-Covariance-Component Estimation of Helmert Type, Surveying and Mapping, 39, 3:225–234.
Kaula WM (1966) Theory of Satellite Geodesy, Blaisdell Press, Waltham, Mass.
Koch KR (1988) Parameter Estimation and Hypothesis Testing in Linear Models, Springer-Verlag.
Lawson CL, Hanson RJ (1974) Solving Least Squares Problems, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
Lerch FJ, Klosko SM, Wagner CA, Patel GB (1985) On the Accuracy of Recent Goddard Gravity Models, J. Geophys. Res., 90, B11:9312–9334.
Lerch FJ, Marsh JG, Klosko SM, Pavlis EC, Patel GB, Chinn DS, Wagner CA (1988) An Improved Error Assessment for the GEM-T1 Gravitational Model, NASA TM 100713.
Marsh JG, Lerch FJ, Putney BH, Christodoulidis DC, Smith DE, Felsentreger TL, Sanchez BV, Klosko SM, Pavlis EC, Martin TV, Robbins JW, Williamson RJ, Colombo OL, Rowlands DD, Eddy WF, Chandler NL, Rachlin KE, Patel GB, Bhati B, Chinn DS (1988) A New Gravitational Model for the Earth from Satellite Tracking Data: GEM-T1, J. Geophys. Res., 93:6169–6215.
Marsh JG, Lerch FJ, Putney BH, Smith DE, Felsentreger TL, Sanchez BV, Klosko SM, Pavlis EC, Martin TV, Robbins JW, Williamson RJ, Colombo OL, Rowlands OL, Eddy WF, Chandler NL, Rachlin KE, Patel GB, Bhati S, Chinn DS (1989) GEM-T2 Gravitational Model, NASA TM 100746.
Moritz H (1978) Least Squares Collocation, Rev. Geophys., 16:421–430.
Pavlis NK (1988) Modeling and Estimation of a Low Degree Geopotential Model from Terrestrial Gravity Data, Report No. 386, Department of Geodetic Science, OSU.
Rapp RH (1986) Gravity Anomalies and Sea Surface Heights Derived from a Combined GEOS-3/SEASAT Altimeter Data Set, J. Geophys. Res., 91, E5:4867–4876.
Wagner CA, Lerch FJ (1978) The Accuracy of Geopotential Models, Planet. Space Sci., 26:1081–1140.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lerch, F.J. Optimum data weighting and error calibration for estimation of gravitational parameters. Bulletin Géodésique 65, 44–52 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00806341
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00806341