Skip to main content
Log in

The structure of tetrad formalisms in general relativity: The general case

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
General Relativity and Gravitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The sets of equations that form the basis for the tetrad formalism approach in general relativity contain considerable redundancy. Papapetrou has determined this redundancy explicitly in the form of three sets of identities and employed these in investigations of the Newman-Penrose tetrad formalism. In this paper Papapetrou's work is reviewed and some of his results that do not seem to be well known are emphasized, along with some general implications. The main new result that is established concerns the Geroch-Held-Penrose formulation of the tetrad formalism. When the sets of equations that are usually used in this formulation are considered in the light of Papapetrou's identities, it is found that certain formal simplifications can be made and that the Geroch-Held-Penrose formulation can be presented more concisely. It is emphasized that the results in this paper apply in the most general case only. Any special cases (e.g., simplified tetrad and/or Riemann tensor) need to be considered separately.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bondi, H., van der Burg, M. G. J., and Metzner, A. W. K. (1962).Proc. R. Soc., London,269A, 21.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Newman, E. T. (1961).J. Math. Phys.,2, 324.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Papapetrou, A. (1971).C. R. Acad. Sci.,Paris,272, 1613.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eisenhart, L. T. (1960).Riemannian Geometry (Princeton University Press, Princeton).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Papapetrou, A. (1971).C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris,272, 1537.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Newman, E. T., and Penrose, R. (1962).J. Math. Phys.,3, 566.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Geroch, R., Held, A., and Penrose, R. (1973).J. Math. Phys.,14, 874.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Papapetrou, A. (1970).Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré,13, 271.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pirani, F. A. E. (1964).Lectures on General Relativity: Brandeis Summer Institute (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dixon, W. G. (1970).J. Math. Phys.,11, 1238.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Newman, E. T., and Unti, T. (1962).J. Math. Phys.,3, 891.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ehlers, W. (1974).Commun. Math. Phys.,37, 327.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Held, A. (1964).Commun. Math. Phys.,37, 311.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Carmeli, M., and Kaye, M. (1976).Ann. Phys., (N. Y.),99, 188.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Edgar, S. B. (1977). Ph.D. thesis (University of London).

  16. Brans, C. H. (1977).J. Math. Phys.,18, 1378.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Edgar, S. B.Int. J. Theor. Phys., to be published.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Edgar, S.B. The structure of tetrad formalisms in general relativity: The general case. Gen Relat Gravit 12, 347–362 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00764473

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00764473

Keywords

Navigation