Skip to main content
Log in

Immunocytological characteriziation of the outer acrosomal membrane (OAM) during acrosome reaction in boar

  • Published:
Histochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In order to study the acrosome reaction in boar, spermatozoa were incubated in a calcium-containing medium in the presence of the calcium ionophore A23187. The time course of the acrosome reaction was assessed by phasecontrast microscopy and correlated with the movement characteristics of the spermatozoa determined by means of multiple-exposure photography (MEP). Different stages of the acrosome reaction could be observed by indirect immunofluorescence using an antibody fraction raised in rabbits against the isolated outer acrosomal membrane (OAM). At the start of the acrosome reaction, a bright fluorescence located exclusively at the acrosomal cap of the sperm head could be observed, whereas after 60–120 min, the fluorescence vanished, indicating the complete loss of the OAM. However, to gain more insight into the stages of the plasma membrane and OAM during the acrosome reaction, immunoelectron-microscopical studies were performed using anti-OAM antibodies detected by the protein-A gold method. Ultrathin sections and total preparations in combination with transmission electron microscopy (TEM) confirmed, that boar spermatozoa start their acrosome reaction by a vesiculation of the plasma membrane, thus exposing the heavily labelled OAM, which is then lost as sheets or large vesicles. The newly exposed inner acrosomal membrane did not show any labelling with gold, thereby indicating clear differences in the antigenicity of both acrosomal membranes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austin CR (1951) Observation on the penetration of the sperm into the mammalian egg. Aust J Sci Res B4:581–589

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin CR (1975) Membrane fusion events in fertilization. J Reprod Fert 44:155–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin CR, Bishop MWH (1958) Some features of the acrosome and the perforatorium in mammalian spermatozoa. Proc R Soc Ser B 149:234–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Avrameas S, Ternynck T (1969) The cross-linking of proteins with glutarealdehyde and its use for the preparation of immunoadsorbents. Immunochemistry 6:53–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Barros C, Bedford JM, Franklin LE, Austin CR (1967) Membrane fusion as a feature of the mammalian acrosome reaction. J Cell Biol 34:C1-C5

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedford JM (1969) Morphological aspects of capacitation. In: Raspe (ed) Schering Symposium on mechanism involved in conception. Advances in the Biosciences, vol 4. Pergamon Press, Vieweg, London-Braunschweig, pp 35–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedford JM (1970) Sperm capacitation and fertilization in mammals. Biol Reprod (Suppl) 2:128–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedford JM, Nicander L (1971) Ultrastructural changes in the acrosome and sperm membranes during maturation of the spermatozoa in the testis and epididymis of the rabbit and monkey. J Anat 108:527–543

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown CR, Harrison RAP (1978) The activation of proacrosin in spermatozoa from ram, bull and boar. Biochim Biophys Acta 526:202–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang MC (1951) Fertilizing capacity of spermatozoa deposited in the fallopian tubes. Nature 168:697–698

    Google Scholar 

  • Friess AE, Sinowatz F (1984) Con A and WGA binding sites of bovine epididymal spermatozoa. TEM of specimen in toto. Biol Cell 50:279–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodpasture JC, Reddy JM, Zanefeld LJM (1981) Acrosin, proacrosin and acrosin inhibitor of guinea pig spermatozoa capacitated and acrosome-reacted in vitro. Biol Reprod 25: 41–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Horrisberger M (1981) Colloidal gold: A cytochemical marker for light and fluorescent microscopy and for transmission and scanning electron microscopy. In: O'Hare (ed) Scanning Electron Microscopy 1981/III, pp 9–31

  • Hyne RV, Garbers DL (1979) Calcium-dependent increase in adenosine-3-5-monophosphate and induction of the acrosome reaction in guinea pig spermatozoa. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:5699–5705

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones RC (1973) Changes occurring in the head of boar spermatozoa. Vesiculation or vacuolation of the acrosome. J Reprod Fert 33:113–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Makler A (1978) A new multiple exposure photography method for objective sperm motility determination. Fert Steril 30:192–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Multamäcki S, Pelliniemi LJ (1973) Ultrastructure of subcellular fractions of bull spermatozoa after hyamine treatment. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat 144:395–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouchterlony Ö (1968) Handbook of immunodiffusion and immunoelectrophoresis. Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson R, Russell L, Bundman D, Freund M (1978) Presence of microfilaments and tubular structures in boar spermatozoa after chemically induced acrosome reaction. Biol Reprod 19:459–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Roosmann GM, Afzelius BA (1975) Acrosome vesiculation in human sperm. J Submicrosc Cytol 7:61–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth J (1982) The protein A-gold (pAg) technique. Qualitative and quantitative approach for antigen localization on thin sections. In: Bullock GR, Petrusz P (eds) Techniques in immunochemistry, vol 1. Academic Press, New York, pp 103–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz MA, Koehler JK (1979) Alteration in lectin binding to guinea pig spermatozoa accompanying in vitro capacitation and acrosome reaction. Biol Reprod 21:1295–1307

    Google Scholar 

  • Shams-Borhan G, Harrison RAP (1981) Production, characterization and use of ionophore-induced, calcium-dependent acrosome reaction in ram spermatozoa. Gamete Res 4:407–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinowatz F, Wrobel K-H (1981) Development of the bovine acrosome. An ultrastructural and cytochemical study. Cell Tissue Res 219:511–524

    Google Scholar 

  • Töpfer-Petersen E, Schill W-B (1981) A new separation method of subcellular fractions of boar spermatozoa. Andrologia 13:174–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Töpfer-Petersen E, Schill W-B (1983) Characterization of lectin receptors isolated from the outer acrosomal membrane of boar spermatozoa. Int J Androl 6:375–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Töpfer-Petersen E, Schmoeckel C, Schill W-B (1983) The acrosomal membrane system-morphological and biochemical studies. Andrologia 15:62–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Töpfer-Petersen E, Auerbeck J, Weiss A, Friess AE, Schill W-B (1985) The sperm acrosome: Immunological investigations using a specific antiserum and four monoclonal antibodies. Int J Fert (submitted for publication)

  • Voller A, Bidwell DE, Bartlett A (1979) The enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA). Dynatech, Guernsey

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooding FBP (1973) The effect of Triton X-100 on the ultrastructure of ejaculated bovine sperm. J Ultrastruct Res 42:502–516

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanagimachi R, Noda YD (1970) Physiologic changes in the post nuclear cap regions of mammalian spermatozoa: a necessary prelimary to the membrane fusion between sperm and egg cells. J Ultrastruct Res 31:486–493

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanagimachi R, Phillips DM (1984) The status of acrosomal caps of hamster spermatozoa immediately before fertilization in vivo. Gamete Res 9:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahler WL, Doak GA (1975) Isolation of the outer acrosomal membrane from bull sperm. Biochim Biophys Acta 406:479–488

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Töpfer-Petersen, E., Friess, A.E., Sinowatz, F. et al. Immunocytological characteriziation of the outer acrosomal membrane (OAM) during acrosome reaction in boar. Histochemistry 82, 113–120 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00708194

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00708194

Keywords

Navigation