Skip to main content
Log in

Wavelength-specific ERG characteristics of pigmented- and white-eyed strains ofDrosophila

  • Published:
Journal of comparative physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Previous electroretinographic (ERG) studies of white-eyed and red-eyed (wild-type)Drosophila melanogaster (Stark and Wasserman, 1972a) yielded results that were in agreement with Goldsmith's (1965) hypothesis that eye-color pigment absorption decreases the recruitment of contributions from peripheral ommatidia into the ERG. These screening pigments therefore produce wavelength-specific differences between these two strains (as well as within the red-eyed strain) in three ERG parameters, namely the magnitudes of the on- and off-transients and the slopes of the receptor potential energy-response functions. In the present study these three ERG parameters were each measured for constant receptor potential magnitudes (to remove the contribution of spectral sensitivityper se) at 13 wavelengths from 350 nm to 650 nm in the following strains:cn (having only pterins),bw (having only ommatins), wild (having both pigment classes), and two white-eyed strains,cn bw andw. Multiple linear regression analyses were carried out in order to determine the relationships between the foregoing three ERG parameters and parameters related to spectral sensitivity. These data lead us to the following conclusions:

  1. 1.

    Unexpected wavelength-dependent parameter differences exist in white-eyed flies. The slopes of the energy-response functions and the magnitudes of the transients all systematically vary and all correlate highly with the spectral sensitivity and with each other. This result implicates another spectrally selective factor other than pigment-determined recruitment in the ERG ofDrosophila. Several hypotheses about the nature of this factor are discussed.

  2. 2.

    Parameter differences attributable strictly to eye-color pigments were found when wild,cn, andbw strains were compared with white-eyed strains. These parameter differences varied linearly with screening pigment density, and multiple linear regression analyses accurately predicted the differences in spectral sensitivity produced by the eye-color pigments from the parameter differences of transient sizes and energy-response function slopes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adolph, A. R.: Thermal and spectral sensitivities of discrete slow potentials inLimulus eye. J. gen. Physiol.52, 584–599 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Alawi, A. A., Pak, W. L.: On-transient of insect electroretinogram: its cellular origin. Science (N.Y.)172, 1055–1057 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Autrum, H.: Electrophysiological analysis of the visual system in insects. Exp. Cell Res.5, 426–439 (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  • Autrum, H., Zettler, F., Järvilehto, M.: Postsynaptic potentials from a single monopolar neuron of the ganglion opticum I of the blowflyCalliphora. Z. vergl. Physiol.70, 414–424 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chappell, R. L., DeVoe, R. D.: Chromatic adaptation in the visible but not in the UV revealed in intracellular recordings from dragonfly ocellar receptors. In: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Program,47 (1973). (Abstract)

  • Draper, N. R., Smith, H.: Applied regression analysis. New York: Wiley 1966

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, H.: Die spektrale Empfindlichkeit des Komplexauges vonMusca (Bestimmung aus Messungen der optomotorischen Reaktion). Kybernetik9, 145–156 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eguchi, E.: Fine structure and spectral sensitivities of retinular cells in the dorsal sector of compound eyes in the dragonflyAeschna. Z. vergl. Physiol.71, 201–218 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ephrussi, B., Herold, J. L.: Studies of eye pigments ofDrosophila I. Methods of extraction—quantitative estimation of the pigment components. Genetics29, 148–175 (1944)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, T. H.: Do flies have a red receptor? J. gen. Physiol.49, 265–287 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, E. B., Williams, T. P.: Calculated effects of “screening pigments.” Vision Res.6, 39–50 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg, M.: Separation of receptor and lamina potentials in the electroretinogram of normal and mutantDrosophila. J. exp. Biol.55, 85–100 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotta, Y., Benzer, S.: Abnormal electroretinograms in visual mutants ofDrosophila. Nature (Lond.)222, 354–356 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Järvilehto, M., Zettler, F.: Electrophysiological-histological studies on some functional properties of visual cells and second order neurons of an insect retina. Z. Zellforsch.136, 291–306 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsley, D. L., Grell, E. H.: Genetic variations of Drosophila melanogaster. Oak Ridge, Tennessee: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 1967

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, G., Arnett, D.: Spectral and polarization sensitivity of the Dipteran visual system. J. gen. Physiol.59, 534–558 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, J. L.: Fundamentals of experimental design. Boston: Allyn and Bacon 1966

    Google Scholar 

  • Naka, K. I., Rushton, W. A. H.: An attempt to analyze colour reception by electrophysiology. J. Physiol. (Lond.)185, 556–586 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, W. S.: The effect of eye colour pigments on the action spectrum ofDrosophila. J. Insect Physiol.19, 999–1006 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, W. S., Wasserman, G. S.: Transient and receptor potentials in the electroretinogram ofDrosophila. Vision Res.12, 1771–1775 (1972 a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, W. S., Wasserman, G. S.: Temporal properties of the ERG on-transient recorded in the retina and lamina. Drosophila Inf. Serv.49, 63 (1972 b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, W. S., Wasserman, G. S.: Parametric analysis of the ERG in eye color mutants ofDrosophila. In: Proc. XIII Int. Cong. Genetics. Genetics74, s265 (1973) (Abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Strother, G. K., Superdock, D. A.:In situ absorption spectra ofDrosophila melanogaster visual screening pigments. Vision Res.12, 1545–1547 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, A. W., Pask, C.: A theory for changes in spectral sensitivity induced by off axis light. J. comp. Physiol.79, 423–427 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, I.: Genetic aspects of ommochrome and pterin pigments. Advanc. Genet.10, 349–403 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We would like to thank Dr. Clifford Gillman for advice on statistics, Dr. Seymour Abrahamson for advice on genetics, and Mr. Charles Hodulik for assistance with the data. Supported in part by grants to Gerald Wasserman from the National Science Foundation (GB-8581) and from the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation. Additional support was provided by an NSF Predoctoral Fellowship awarded to William Stark; computer time was provided by the University of Wisconsin Graduate Research Committee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stark, W.S., Wasserman, G.S. Wavelength-specific ERG characteristics of pigmented- and white-eyed strains ofDrosophila . J. Comp. Physiol. 91, 427–441 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00694472

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00694472

Keywords

Navigation