Summary
-
1.
The large compound eyes ofPeriplaneta are covered with irregular rows of low relief facets (10μm high).
-
2.
Measurement of interommatidial angles show large variations in these angles for both horizontal and vertical planes. Trends exist, however, with horizontal interommatidial angles increasing posteriorly from 1.9 ° to 10.0 °, and vertical field angles increasing posteriorly from 1.0 ° to 4.7 °.
-
3.
The maximum composite field of view for each eye is 240 ° in the horizontal plane, and 198 ° in the vertical plane. This results in a dorsal overlap of 40 °, an anterior overlap of 65 ° and a posterior overlap of 56 °. Thus, the necessary anatomical arrangement is present for binocular vision.
-
4.
The eyes ofPeriplaneta are a very dark, uniform colour, and apparently lack pseudopupils. An alternative explanation of the pseudopupil phenomenon to that of Yagi and Koyama (1963) is given and it is postulated that virtually all insects have them, although they may not be visible.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barrós Pita, J. C., Maldonado, H.: A fovea in the preying mantis eye. II. Some morphological characteristics. Z. vergl. Physiol.67, 79–92 (1970).
Baumann, F.: Slow and spike potentials recorded from retinula cells of the honeybee drone in response to light. J. gen. Physiol.52, 855–885 (1969).
Baumgärtner, H.: Der Formensinn und die Sehschärfe der Bienen. Z. vergl. Physiol.7, 56–143 (1928).
Bernhard, C. G., Gemne, G., Sällstrom, J.: Comparative ultrastructure of corneal surface topography in insects with aspects on phylogenesis and function. Z. vergl. Physiol.67, 1–25 (1970).
Borradaile, L. A., Potts, F. A., Eastham, L. E. S., Saunders, J. T.: The invertebrata, 3rd ed., p. 472. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1958.
Brown, E. B.: Modern optics, p. 645. New York: Reinhold 1965.
Burkhardt, D., Motte, I. de la, Seitz, G.: Physiological optics of the compound eye of the blow fly. In: C. G. Bernhard (ed.), The functional organization of the compound eye, p. 51–62. Oxford: Pergamon Press 1966.
Burtt, E. T., Catton, W. T.: Resolving power of the compound eye. Symp. Soc. exp. Biol.16, 72–85 (1962).
Butler, R.: The anatomy of the compound eye ofPeriplaneta americana L. 2. Fine structure. J. comp. Physiol.83, 239–262 (1973).
Butler, R., Horridge, G. A.: The electrophysiology of the retina ofPeriplaneta americana L. 1. Changes in receptor acuity upon light/dark adaptation. J. comp. Physiol.83, 263–278 (1973).
Gemperlein, R.: Grundlagen zur genauen Beschreibung von Komplexaugen. Z. vergl. Physiol.65, 428–444 (1969).
Guthrie, D. M., Tindall, A. R.: The biology of the cockroach, p. 408. London: William Clowes and Sons 1968.
Hecht, S., Wolf, E.: The visual acuity of the honeybee. J. gen. Physiol.12, 727–760 (1929).
Horridge, G. A.: Further observations on the clear zone eye ofEphestia. Proc. roy. Soc. B181, 157–173 (1972).
Jörschcke, H.: Die Facettenaugen der Orthopteren und Termiten. Z. wiss. Zool.111, 153–280 (1914).
Levin, L., Maldonado, H.: A fovea in the preying mantis eye. III. The centring of the prey. Z. vergl. Physiol.67, 93–191 (1970).
Maldonado, H., Barrós Pita, J. C.: A fovea in the preying mantis eye. I. Estimation of the catching distance. Z. vergl. Physiol.67, 58–78 (1970).
Maldonado, H., Benko, M., Isern, M.: Study of the role of the binocular vision in mantids to estimate long distances, using the deimatic reaction as experimental situation. Z. vergl. Physiol.68, 72–83 (1970).
Maldonado, H., Levin, L.: Distance estimation and monocular cleaning reflex in preying mantis. Z. vergl. Physiol.56, 258–267 (1967).
Maldonado, H., Levin, L., Barrós Pita, J. C.: Hit distance and the predatory strike of the preying mantis. Z. vergl. Physiol.56, 237–257 (1967).
McCann, G. D., MacGinitie, G. F.: Optomotor response studies of insect vision. Proc. roy. Soc. B163, 369–401 (1965).
Miall, L. C., Denny, A.: The structure and life-history of the cockroach (Periplaneta orientalis), p. 224. London: Rovell Reeve 1886.
Perrelet, A.: The fine structure of the retina of the honeybee drone. An electron microscopical study. Z. Zellforsch.108, 530–562 (1970).
Seitz, G.: Der Strahlengang im Appositionsauge vonCalliphora erythrocephala (Meig.). Z. vergl. Physiol.59, 205–231 (1968).
Seitz, G.: Untersuchungen am dioptrischen Apparat des Leuchtkäferauges. Z. vergl. Physiol.62, 61–74 (1969).
Snodgrass, R. E.: Principles of insect morphology, p. 667. New York: McGraw Hill 1935.
Varela, F. G., Wiitanen, W.: The optics of the compound eye of the honeybee (Apis mellifera). J. gen. Physiol.55, 336–358 (1970).
Walcott, B.: Cell movement on light adaption in the retina ofLethocerus (Belostomatidae, Hemiptera). Z. vergl. Physiol.74, 1–16 (1971a).
Walcott, B.: Unit studies on receptor movement in the retina ofLethocerus (Belostomatidae, Hemiptera). Z. vergl. Physiol.74, 17–25 (1971b).
Wolken, J. J., Gupta, P. D.: Photoreceptor structures. The retinal cells of the cockroach eye. IV.Periplaneta americana andBlaberus giganteus. J. biophys. biochem. Cytol.9, 720–724 (1961).
Yagi, N., Koyama, N.: The compound eye ofLepidoptera, pp. 319. Tokyo: Shinkoy-Press 1963.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Butler, R. The anatomy of the compound eye ofPeriplaneta americana L.. J. Comp. Physiol. 83, 223–238 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00693676
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00693676