Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative uptake and retention of adriamycin andN-benzyladriamycin-14-valerate in human CEM leukemic lymphocyte cell cultures

  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

N-Benzyladriamycin-14-valerate (AD 198) is a new lipophilic adriamycin (ADR) analogue that shows marked therapeutic superiority to ADR in murine tumor model systems yet differs mechanistically from ADR in a number of ways. Among its other properties, AD 198 produces a delayed but profound effect on cell-cycle progression and a pattern of continuing DNA damage in cultured cells briefly exposed to the drug. Using radiolabeled drug forms and radioassays combined with HPLC separation and fluorimetric detection techniques, aspects of drug accumulation, biotransformation, and retention in cultured human CEM leukemic lymphocytes were studied, in part to determine a possible pharmacologic basis for the latent effects seen with this drug. In addition, the cellular pharmacology of AD 198 and ADR were comparatively examined under identical experimental conditions. When CEM cells were incubated with drug at equi-growth inhibitory/minimally cytotoxic concentrations (AD 198, 1.0 μM; ADR, 0.1 μM), a number of differences were apparent. Under conditions of continuous 24-h drug exposure, a slow cellular accumulation and equilibration was observed with ADR (cell: medium equilibrium, 1:11 after 4–6 h), whereas the uptake of AD 198 was rapid and extensive (cell: medium equilibrium, 3:1 within 30 min). In drug-retention studies, when cells were pretreated at the same drug concentrations as before (AD 198 for 1 h; ADR for 4 h) and then transferred to drug-free media, both compounds re-equilibrated their intracellular drug content with the fresh media, losing about 50% of their respective anthracycline levels. Liquid chromatographic analysis of ADR-treated cultures under both sets of conditions showed the parent drug to be the only intracellular anthracycline species, whereas analysis of AD 198-treated cultures revealed two fluorescent signals corresponding to the parent drug and its 14-deesterified biotransformation product,N-benzyladriamycin (AD 288). Levels of AD 288 rose from 2% of the total intracellular anthracycline content immediately on drug admixture to 61% following 24 h continuous drug exposure and to 69% at 24 h in cells exposed to drug for 1 h and then continued in drug-free media for 24 h. At all times, the balance of the intracellular anthracycline fluorescence was attributable to the parent drug; no ADR was detectable in AD 198-treated cells by either fluorescence detection or radioassay. Thus, AD 198 is not a prodrug form of ADR, and the in vitro effects of this agent, including the latent effects on cell-cycle inhibition and DNA damage seen in cells following short-term drug exposure, can be explained on the basis of the high levels of active parent drug and biotransformation product that accumulate and persist in the cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ADR:

adriamycin (doxorubicin)

AD 198:

N-benzyladriamycin-14-valerate

AD 288:

N-benzyladriamycin

AD 32:

N-trifluoroacetyladriamycin-14-valerate

AD 143:

N-trifluoroacetyladriamycin-14-0-hemiadipate

AD 41:

N-trifluoroacetyladriamycin

[14C]-AD 198:

[benzyl]-α-methylene-14C]-N-benzyladriamycin-14-valerate

[14C]-ADR:

[14-14C]-adriamycin

HPLC:

high-performance liquid chromatography

TLC:

thin-layer chromatography

DMSO:

dimethylsulfoxide

S-MEM:

Eagle's minimum essential medium for suspension culture

PBS:

phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.0)

References

  1. Bodley A, Liu LF, Israel M, Seshadri R, Koseki Y, Giuliani FC, Silber R, Kirschenbaum S, Potmesil M (1989) DNA topoisomerase II-mediated interaction by doxorubicin and daunorubicin congeners with DNA. Cancer Res (in press)

  2. Bodley A, Liu LF, Israel M, Seshadri R, Koseki Y, Kirschenbaum S, Silber R, Potmesil M (1989)N-Alkyl analogs of doxorubicin do not inhibit DNA topoisomerase II. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 30: 621

    Google Scholar 

  3. DiMarco A (1975) Adriamycin (NSC-123127): mode and mechanism of action. Cancer Chemother Rep 6 [3]: 91

    Google Scholar 

  4. DiMarco A (1982) Anthracycline antibiotics. In: Holland JF, Frei E III (eds) Cancer medicine, 2nd edn. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, p 872

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ganapathi R, Grabowski D, Sweatman TW, Seshadri R, Israel M (1988) Characterization in vitro and in vivo of cross-resistance toN-benzyladriamycin-14-valerate in progressively doxorubicin-resistant cells. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 29: 299

    Google Scholar 

  6. Israel M, Modest EJ (1977)N-Trifluoroacetyladriamycin-14-alkanoates and therapeutic compositions containing same. U.S. Patent 4,035,566. U.S. Patent Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  7. Israel M, Seshadri R (1986)N-Alkyl andN-benzyl adriamycin derivatives. U.S. Patent 4,610,977. U.S. Patent Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  8. Israel M, Seshadri R, Idriss JM (1985)N-Benzyladriamycin-14-valerate (AD 198), a promising new adriamycin (ADR) analog. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 26: 224

    Google Scholar 

  9. Israel M, Idriss JM, Seshadri R (1986) In vitro studies withN-benzyladriamycin-14-valerate (AD 198), a new anthracycline analog. Abstracts, 14th International Cancer Congress, Budapest, Hungary, August 1986, vol 1. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, p 159

    Google Scholar 

  10. Israel M, Idriss JM, Koseki Y, Khetarpal VK (1987) Comparative effects of adriamycin and DNA-nonbinding analogues on DNA, RNA, and protein synthesis in vitro. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 20: 277

    Google Scholar 

  11. Israel M, Seshadri R, Koseki Y, Sweatman TW, Idriss JM (1987) Amelioration of adriamycin toxicity through modification of drug-DNA binding properties. Cancer Treat Rev 14: 163

    Google Scholar 

  12. Krishan A, Israel M, Modest EJ, Frei E III (1976) Differences in cellular uptake and cytofluorescence of adriamycin andN-trifluoroacetyladriamycin-14-valerate. Cancer Res 36: 2114

    Google Scholar 

  13. Krishan A, Israel M, Sauertieg A (1986) Cellular retention and cytotoxicity ofN-benzyladriamycin-14-valerate (AD 198) in doxorubicin-resistant P388/R84 cells. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 27: 245

    Google Scholar 

  14. Maniar N, Krishan A, Israel M, Samy TSA (1988) Anthracycline-induced DNA breaks and resealing in doxorubicin-resistant murine leukemia P388 cells. Biochem Pharmacol 37: 1763

    Google Scholar 

  15. Meriwether WD, Bachur NR (1972) Inhibition of DNA and RNA metabolism in L1210 leukemia. Cancer Res 32: 1137

    Google Scholar 

  16. Penco S, Vicario GP, Angelucci F, Arcamone F (1977) Synthesis of [14-14C]-daunorubicin and doxorubicin. J Antibiot 30: 73

    Google Scholar 

  17. Potmesil M, Israel M, Seshadri R, Sweatman TW, Kirschenbaum S, Silber R (1987) Structure and biological activity ofN-substituted anthracyclines: correlation with drug-DNA topoisomerase II interaction. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 28: 262

    Google Scholar 

  18. Silber R, Liu LF, Israel M, Bodley AL, Hsiang Y-H, Kirschenbaum S, Sweatman TW, Seshadri R, Potmesil M (1987) Metabolic activation ofN-acylanthracyclines procedes their interaction with DNA topoisomerase II. NCI Monogr 4: 111

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sweatman TW, Koseki Y, Seshadri R, Israel M, Beck WT (1988) Activity ofN-benzyladriamycin-14-valerate (AD 198) in vitro against mechanistically different multidrug-resistant CEM cell lines. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 29: 271

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tewey KM, Rowe TC, Yang L, Halligan BD, Liu LF (1983) Adriamycin-induced DNA damage mediated by mammalian DNA topoisomerase II. Science 226: 466

    Google Scholar 

  21. Traganos F, Israel M, Seshadri R, Kirschenbaum S, Potmesil M (1985) Effects of newN-alkyl analogues of adriamycin on in vitro survival and cell-cycle progression of L1210 cells. Cancer Res 45: 6272

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Israel, M., Sweatman, T.W., Seshadri, R. et al. Comparative uptake and retention of adriamycin andN-benzyladriamycin-14-valerate in human CEM leukemic lymphocyte cell cultures. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 25, 177–183 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00689579

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00689579

Keywords

Navigation