Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of scheduling on two-drug combinations of alkylating agents in vivo

  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The effects of schedule and sequence on the survival of EMT6 tumor cell and bone marrow (CFU-GM) obtained after treatment using combinations of cyclophosphamide (CTX) and thiotEPA or melphalan (l-PAM) were examined and analyzed by isobologram methodology. On a single-injection schedule, when CTX and thiotEPA were given simultaneously or thiotEPA was given prior to CTX, the result was slightly greater than additive tumor-cell kill. However, when CTX preceded thiotEPA by 4 h, there was less than additive cell kill. When the interval between the administration of the two drugs was 8 h, both sequences of the drugs produced greater than additive tumor-cell kill. Simultaneous administration of CTX and thiotEPA on a multiple-injection schedule resulted in sub-additive tumor-cell kill. On the multiple-injection schedule, extending the interval between injections of CTX and thiotEPA to 4 and 8 h resulted in increasing tumor-cell kill. With the 4- and 8-h intervals, no significant sequence-dependent difference in tumor-cell kill was obtained. The results of CTX andl-PAM combinations paralleled those of CTX and thiotEPA. Bone marrow (CFU-GM) survival was used as a representative normal tissue with which to compare tumor-cell survival after each treatment to obtain a measure of therapeutic effect. The trends for the ratios of bone marrow: tumor cell survival were the same for the treatment sequences of CTX with thiotEPA orl-PAM; however, greater magnitudes of differential tumor-cell kill were obtained with CTXl-PAM combinations. Using this measure, the greatest therapeutic effectiveness was seen with single-dosel-PAM or thiotEPA followed 4 h later by CTX and with CTX given as a single or as multiple doses followed 8 h later byl-PAM or thiotEPA. Such data from tumor-model systems may be useful in the development of more effective alkylating agent regimens for use in the clinic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

L-PAM:

melphalan, L-phenylalanine mustard

thiotEPA:

N, N1 N11-triethylenethiophosphoramide

CTX:

cyclophosphamide

PBS:

phosphate buffered saline

FBS:

fetal bovine serum

DME:

Dulbecco's minimal essential medium

CFU-GM:

granulocyte-macrophage colony forming units

References

  1. Adams DJ, Carmichael J, Wolf CR (1985) Altered mouse bone marrow glutathione and glutathione transferase levels in response to cytotoxins. Cancer Res 45: 1669

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berenbaum MC (1977) Synergy, additivism and antagonism in immunosuppression. Clin Exp Immunol 28: 1

    Google Scholar 

  3. Colvin M (1982) The alkylating agents. In: Pharmacologic principles of cancer treatment. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 276–306

    Google Scholar 

  4. Deen DF, Williams MW (1979) Isobologram analysis of X-ray-BCNU interactions in vitro. Radiat Res 79: 483

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dewey WC, Stone LE, Miller HH, Giblak RE (1971) Radiosensitization with 5-bromodeoxyuridine of Chinese hamster cells X-irradiated during different phases of the cell cycle. Radiat Res 47: 672

    Google Scholar 

  6. Frei E III (1985) Curative cancer chemotherapy. Cancer Res 45: 6523–6537

    Google Scholar 

  7. Frei E III, Teicher BA, Holden SA, Cathcart KNS, Wang Y (1988) Effect of alkylating agent dose: preclinical studies and possible clinical correlation. Cancer Res 48: (in press)

  8. Goldin A (1984) Dosing and sequencing for antineoplastic synergism in combination chemotherapy. Cancer 54: 1155

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hagenbeek A, Martens AC (1987) Conditioning regimens before bone marrow transplantation in acute myelocytic leukemia. In: Autologous bone marrow transplantation. The University of Texas, Houston, pp 99–103

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hedley DW, McElwain EJ, Millar JL, Gordon MY (1978) Acceleration of bone marrow recovery by pretreatment with cyclophosphamide in patients receiving high-dose melphalan. Lancet II: 966

    Google Scholar 

  11. Litchfield JT, Wilcoxon FA (1949) A simplified method of evaluating dose-effect experiments. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 96: 99

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mihich E, Grindey GB (1977) Multiple basis of combination chemotherapy. Cancer 40: 534

    Google Scholar 

  13. Millar JL, Hudspith BN, Blackett NM (1975) Reduced lethality in mice receiving a combined dose of cyclophosphamide and busulphan. Br J Cancer 32: 193

    Google Scholar 

  14. Millar JL, Blackett NM, Hudspith BN (1978) Enhanced postirradiation recovery of the haemopoietic system in animals pretreated with a variety of cytotoxic agents. Cell Tissue Kinet 11: 543

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rockwell S (1977) In vivo-in vitro tumor systems: new models for studying the response of tumors in therapy. Lab Anim Sci 27: 831

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rockwell S (1978) Cytotoxic and radiosensitizing effects of hypoxic cell sensitizers on EMT6 mouse mammary tumor cells in vivo and in vitro. Br J Cancer 37: 212

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rockwell S, Kallman RF (1973) Cellular radiosensitivity and tumor radiation response in the EMT6 tumor cell system. Radiat Res 53: 281

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rockwell S, Kallman RF, Fajardo LF (1972) Characteristics of a serially transplanted mouse mammary tumor and its tissue culture adaption. J Natl Cancer Inst 49: 735

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schabel FM, Trader MW, Laster WR, Wheeler GP, Witt MH (1978) Patterns of resistance and therapeutic synergism among alkylating agents. Antibiotic Chemother 23: 200

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schabel FM, Griswold DP, Corbett TH, Laster WR, Mayo JG, Lloyd HH (1979) Testing therapeutic hypotheses in mice and man: observations on the therapeutic activity against advanced solid tumors of mice treated with anticancer drugs that have demonstrated or potential clinical utility for treatment of advanced solid tumors of man. Methods Cancer Res 17: 1

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schabel FM, Griswold DP, Coorbett TH, Laster WR (1983) Increasing therapeutic response rates to anticancer drugs by applying the basic principles of pharmacology. Pharmacol Ther 20: 283

    Google Scholar 

  22. Skipper HE (1974) Combination therapy: some concepts and results. Cancer Chemother Rep 4: 137

    Google Scholar 

  23. Steel GG, Peckham MJ (1979) Exploitable mechanisms in combined radiotherapy-chemotherapy: the concept of additivity. Int J Radiat FQ

  24. Tallarida RJ, Murray RB (1981) Manual of pharmacologic calculations with computer programs. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  25. Teicher BA, Holden SA, Jacobs JL (1987) Approaches to defining the mechanism of enhancement by fluosol-DA 20% with carbogen of melphalan antitumor activity. Cancer Res 47: 513

    Google Scholar 

  26. Teicher BA, Holden SA, Cucchi CA, Cathcart KNS, Korbut TT, Flatow JL, Frei E III (1988) Combination ofN,N′,N″-triethylenephosphoramide and cyclophosphamide in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Res 48: 94

    Google Scholar 

  27. Teicher BA, Holden SA, Eder JP, Brann TW, Jones SM, Frei E III (1989) Influence of scheduling on alkylating agent cytotoxicity in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Res (in press)

  28. Wittes RE, Goldin A (1986) Unresolved issues in combination chemotherapy. Cancer Treat Rep 70: 105

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported by grant PO1-37859 from the National Cancer Institute, a grant from Lederle Co., Pearl River NY, and a grant from the Mathers Foundation

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Teicher, B.A., Holden, S.A., Jones, S.M. et al. Influence of scheduling on two-drug combinations of alkylating agents in vivo. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 25, 161–166 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00689576

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00689576

Keywords

Navigation