Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparative Study of Antitumor Efficiency of Intraperitoneal and Intravenous Cytostatics in Experimental Rats with Disseminated Ovarian Cancer

  • Published:
Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine Aims and scope

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Antitumor efficiencies of cytostatics dioxadet, cisplatin, mitomycin C, melphalan, and paclitaxel after a single intraperitoneal or intravenous injection in doses of 1.5, 4, 1.5, 2, and 5 mg/kg, respectively, were studied on the model of transplanted ovarian tumor in 124 rats. The antitumor effects were evaluated by the increase in median survival. Dioxadet, cisplatin, and melphalan injected intraperitoneally significantly prolonged the lifespan median – by 79, 88, and 114%, respectively, and were in fact ineffective, when injected intravenously. Intraperitoneal mitomycin C prolonged lifespan median by just 35%, intravenous – by 152%. Paclitaxel injected intraperitoneally and intravenously prolonged the lifespan median by 45 and 81%, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bespalov VG, Belyaeva OA, Kireeva GS, Senchik KYu, Stukov AN, Aristova VA, Vyshinskaya EA, Konkov SA, Krylova IA, Semenov AL, Maydin MA, Alexandrov VA, Belyaev AM. Antitumor effect of dioxadet in intraperitoneal chemoperfusion treatment for advanced ovarian cancer in experimental setting. Vopr. Onkol. 2014;60(2):72-79. Russian.

  2. Bespalov VG, Belyaeva OA, Panchenko AV, Stukov AN, Gershanovich ML, Murazov YaG, Konkov SA, Kilmaeva NE, Krylova IM, Mironyuk TA, Latipova DKh. Antitumor activity of dioxadet compared with cisplatin activity in ascitic ovarian tumor rat model. Vopr. Onkol. 2011;57(6):771-774. Russian.

  3. Adikesavan AK, Jaiswal AK. Thioredoxin-like domains required for glucose regulatory protein 58 mediated reductive activation of mitomycin C leading to DNA cross-linking. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2007;6(10):2719-2727.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Blinman P, Gainford C, Donoghoe M, Martyn J, Blomfield P, Grant P, Kichenadasse G, Vaughan M, Brand A, Shannon C, Gebski V, Stockler M, Friedlander M. Feasibility, acceptability and preferences for intraperitoneal chemotherapy with paclitaxel and cisplatin after optimal debulking surgery for ovarian and related cancers: an ANZGOG study. J. Gynecol. Oncol. 2013;24(4):359-366.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Cristea M, Han E, Salmon L, Morgan RJ. Practical considerations in ovarian cancer chemotherapy. Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol. 2010;2(3):175-187.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Echarri Gonzales MJ, Green R, Muggia FM. Intraperitoneal drug delivery for ovarian cancer: why, how, who, what, and when? Oncology (Williston Park). 2011;25(2):156-165.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Galluzzi L, Vitale I, Michels J, Brenner C, Szabadkai G, Harel-Bellan A, Castedo M, Kroemer G. Systems biology of cisplatin resistance: past, present and future. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5. e1257. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2013.428.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Hasovits C, Clarke S. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intraperitoneal cancer chemotherapeutics. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2012;51(4):203-224.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jelovac D, Armstrong DK. Recent progress in the diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer. CA: Cancer J. Clin. 2011;61(3):183-203.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA: Cancer J. Clin. 2011;61(2):69-90.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kampan NC, Madondo MT, McNally OM, Quinn M, Plebanski M. Paclitaxel and its evolving role in the management of ovarian cancer. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015;2015. e413076. doi: 10.1155/2015/413076.

  12. Kemp Z, Ledermann J. Update on first-line treatment of advanced ovarian carcinoma. Int. J. Womens Health. 2013;5:45-51.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Yan TD, Cao CQ, Munkholm-Larsen S. A pharmacological review on intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal malignancy. World J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 2010;2(2):109-116.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. N. Vasil’eva.

Additional information

Translated from Byulleten’ Eksperimental’noi Biologii i Meditsiny, Vol. 162, No. 9, pp. 370-373, September, 2016

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bespalov, V.G., Vyshinskaya, E.A., Vasil’eva, I.N. et al. Comparative Study of Antitumor Efficiency of Intraperitoneal and Intravenous Cytostatics in Experimental Rats with Disseminated Ovarian Cancer. Bull Exp Biol Med 162, 383–386 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10517-017-3621-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10517-017-3621-5

Key Words

Navigation