Skip to main content
Log in

In situ analysis of cell kinetics in human brain tumors

A comparative immunocytochemical study of S phase cells by a new in vitro bromodeoxyuridine-labeling technique, and of proliferating pool cells by monoclonal antibody Ki-67

  • Regular Papers
  • Published:
Acta Neuropathologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A newly developed in vitro labeling method with bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) identifies S phase cells in situ in freshly obtained surgical tissue of human brain tumors which is subsequently fixed and embedded in paraffin for BrdU immunovisualization. For the first time, the BrdU labeling index (LI) is successfully compared here with the LI obtained by immunostaining of frozen sections of the same tumors with monoclonal antibody Ki-67 which identifies all proliferating cells, i.e., the growth fraction. LIs were counted in at least five different areas with high density of labeled cells; at least 1,000 cells were counted. In 13 metastatic tumors, Ki-67 LI was 8.3%–62.6%, and BrdU LI was 5.1%–28.0%. In 18 gliomas, Ki-67 LI was 1.4%–19.3%, and BrdU LI was 0.2%–11.6%. In 7 meningiomas, Ki-67 LI was 0.3%–3.0%, and BrdU LI was 0%–2.0%. Statistical comparison of Ki-67 and BrdU LIs by linear regression analysis revealed a highly significant correlation: BrdU LI=0.99+0.34 Ki-67 LI (r=0.92,P<0.001). A significant heterogeneity of proliferation patterns may occur within one sample from area to area, as well as between different samples of the same tumor, especially in gliomas; thus, some subjective influence on LIs by arbitrary sampling and selection could occur in quantitative evaluation of in situ cell kinetics of human brain tumors. This study indicates that our in vitro BrdU-labeling method allows the in situ identification of S phase cells in excellently preserved fixed tumor tissue which is well suited for further histological examination. This method compares favorably with Ki-67 labeling of frozen sections and might emerge as a powerful new tool for the routine study of cell proliferation in surgical specimens of human brain tumors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baserga R (1981) The cell cycle. N Engl J Med 304:453–459

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bookwalter III JW, Selker RG, Schiffer L, Randall M, Iannuzzi D, Kristofik M (1986) Brain-tumor cell kinetics correlated with survival. J Neurosurg 65:795–798

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brammer I, Zywietz F, Jung H (1979) Changes of histological and proliferative indices in the Walker carcinoma with tumour size and distance from blood vessel. Eur J Cancer 15:1329–1336

    Google Scholar 

  4. Broggi G, Franzini A, Ferraresi S, Giorgi C, Allegranza A (1987) Prognostic value of labeling index in stereotactic biopsies of glial tumors. In: Chatel M, Darcel F, Pecker J (eds) Brain oncology. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp 75–78

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burger PC, Shibata T, Kleihues P (1986) The use of the monoclonal antibody Ki-67 in the identification of proliferating cells: application to surgical neuropathology. Am J Surg Pathol 10:611–617

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gabbert H, Wagner R, Höhn P (1982) The relation between tumor cell proliferation and vascularization in differentiated and undifferentiated colon carcinomas in the rat. Virchows Arch [B] 41:119–131

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gerdes J, Schwab U, Lemke H, Stein H (1983) Production of a mouse monoclonal antibody reactive with a human nuclear antigen associated with cell proliferation. Int J Cancer 31:13–20

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gerdes J, Lemke H, Baisch H, Wacker H-N, Schwab U, Stein H (1984) Cell cycle analysis of a cell proliferation-associated human nuclear antigen defined by the monoclonal antibody Ki-67. J Immunol 133:1710–1715

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gerdes J (1985) An immunohistological method for estimating cell growth fractions in rapid histopathological diagnosis during surgery. Int J Cancer 35:169–171

    Google Scholar 

  10. Giangaspero F, Doglioni C, Rivano MT, Pileri S, Gerdes J, Stein H (1987) Growth fraction in human brain tumors defined by the monoclonal antibody Ki-67. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 74:179–182

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hoshino T, Wilson CB (1979) Cell kinetic analyses of human malignant brain tumors (gliomas). Cancer 44:956–962

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hoshino T (1979) The cell kinetics for gliomas: its prognostic value and therapeutic implications. Neurooncology 1: 105–112

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hoshino T, Nagashima T, Murovic J, Levin EM, Levin VA, Rupp SM (1985) Cell kinetic studies of in situ human brain tumors with bromodeoxyuridine. Cytometry 6:627–632

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hsu S-M, Raine L, Fauger H (1981) Use of avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (ABC) in immunoperoxidase techniques: a comparison between ABC and unlabeled antibody (PAP) procedures. J Histochem Cytochem 29:577–580

    Google Scholar 

  15. Klingerman MM, Heidenreich WF, Greene S (1962) Distribution of tritiated thymidine about capillary sinusoid in a transplanted mouse tumour. Nature 20:282–283

    Google Scholar 

  16. Landolt AM, Shibata T, Kleihues P (1987) Growth rate of human pituitary adenomas. J Neurosurg 67:803–806

    Google Scholar 

  17. Molnar P, Groothuis D, Blasberg R, Zaharko D, Owens E, Fenstermacher J (1984) Regional thymidine transport and incorporation in experimental brain and subcutaneous tumors. J Neurochem 43:421–432

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nagashima T, DeArmond SJ, Murovic J, Hoshino T (1985) Immunocytochemical demonstration of S-phase cells by anti-bromodeoxyuridine monoclonal antibody in human brain tumor tissues. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 67:155–159

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rajewsky M (1966) Zellproliferation in normalen und malignen Geweben:3H-Thymidin-Einbau in vitro unter Standardbedingungen. Biophysik 3:65–93

    Google Scholar 

  20. Roggendorf W, Schuster T, Peiffer J (1987) Proliferative potential of meningiomas determined with the monoclonal antibody Ki-67. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 73:361–364

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rutgers DH, Niessen DPP, Van der Linden PM (1987) Cell Kinetics of hypoxic cells in a murine tumour in vivo: flow cytometric determination of the radiation-induced blockage of cell cycle progression. Cell Tissue Kinet 20:37–42

    Google Scholar 

  22. Steel GG, Bensted JPM (1965) In vitro studies of cell proliferation in tumours. I. Critical appraisal of methods and theoretical considerations. Eur J Cancer 1:275–279

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tannock IF (1968) The relation between cell proliferation and the vascular system in a transplanted mouse mammary tumour. Br J Cancer 22:258–273

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported by funds from the Commission for Cancer Research of the Medical Faculty of the University of Vienna

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morimura, T., Kitz, K. & Budka, H. In situ analysis of cell kinetics in human brain tumors. Acta Neuropathol 77, 276–282 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00687579

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00687579

Key words

Navigation