Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison between geochemical and biological estimates of subsurface microbial activities

  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Geochemical and biological estimates of in situ microbial activities were compared from the aerobic and microaerophilic sediments of the Atlantic Coastal Plain. Radioisotope time-course experiments suggested oxidation rates greater than millimolar quantities per year for acetate and glucose. Geochemical analyses assessing oxygen consumption, soluble organic carbon utilization, sulfate reduction, and carbon dioxide production suggested organic oxidation rates of nano- to micromolar quantities per year. Radiotracer timecourse experiments appeared to overestimate rates of organic carbon oxidation, sulfate reduction, and biomass production by a factor of 103–106 greater than estimates calculated from groundwater analyses. Based on the geochemical evidence, in situ microbial metabolism was estimated to be in the nano- to micromolar range per year, and the average doubling time for the microbial community was estimated to be centuries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Balkwill DL (1989) Numbers, diversity, and morphological characteristics of aerobic, chemoheterotrophic bacteria in deep subsurface sediments from a site in South Carolina. Geomicrobial J 7:33–52

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bledsoe HW (1988) SRP Baseline hydrologic investigation-Phase III. (Report DPST-88-627, Savannah River Laboratory) E.I. Dupont de Nemours and Co., Inc., Aiken, South Carolina

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bledsoe HW, Aadland RK, Sargent KA (1990) SRS baseline investigation-summary report. (Report WSRC-RP-90-1010, Savannah River Site) E.I. Dupont de Nemours and Co., Inc., Aiken, South Carolina

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buswell AM, Larson TE (1937) Methane in ground waters. J Am Water Works Assoc 29:1978–1982

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chapelle FH, Lovley DR (1990) Rates of microbial metabolism in deep coastal plain aquifers. Appl Environ Microbiol 56:1865–1874

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chapelle FH, Morris JT, McMahon PB, Zelibor JL, Jr (1988) Bacterial metabolism and the13C-composition of ground water, Floridan aquifer system, South Carolina. Geology 16:117–121

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chapelle FH, Zelibor JL, Jr., Grimes DJ, Knobel LL (1988) Bacteria in deep coastal plains sediments of Maryland: a possible source of CO2 to groundwater. Water Resour Res 23:1625–1632

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cheng SL, Long A (1984) Implementation of a carbon isotope subroutine to the computer program PHREEQE and the application to14C-ground-water dating. In: Hydrology and water resources of Arizona and the Southwest, vol 14. (Proceedings of the 1984 Meetings of the Arizona Section, American Water Resources Association and the Hydrology Section, Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science) Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science, Tucson, Arizona, pp 121–125

    Google Scholar 

  9. Colwell FS (1989) Microbiological comparison of surface soil and unsaturated subsurface soil from a semiarid high desert. Appl Environ Microbiol 55:2420–2423

    Google Scholar 

  10. Conrad RT, Phelps TJ, Zeikus JG (1985) Gas metabolism evidence in support of the juxtaposition of hydrogen-producing and methanogenic bacteria in sewage sludge and lake sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 50:595–601

    Google Scholar 

  11. Findlay RH, Pollard PC, Moriarty DJW, White DC (1985) Quantitative determination of microbial activity and community nutritional status in estuarine sediments: evidence for a disturbance artifact. Can J Microbiol 31:493–498

    Google Scholar 

  12. Francis AJ, Slater JM, Dodge CJ (1989) Denitrification in deep subsurface sediments. Geomicrobiol J 7:103–116

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fredrickson JK, Garland TR, Hicks RJ, Thomas JM, Li SW, McFadden KM (1989) Lithotrophic and heterotrophic bacteria in deep subsurface sediments and their relation to sediment properties. Geomicrobiol J 7:53–66

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fredrickson JK, Balkwill DL, Zachara JM, Li SW, Brockman FJ, Simmons MA (1991) Physiological diversity and distributions of heterotrophic bacteria in deep cretaceous sediments of the Atlantic Coastal Plain. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:402–411

    Google Scholar 

  15. Harris RF, Adams SS (1979) Determination of the carbon-bound electron composition of microbial cells and metabolites by dichromate oxidation. Appl Environ Microbiol 37:237–243

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hicks RJ, Fredrickson JK (1989) Aerobic metabolic potential of microbial populations indigenous to deep subsurface environments. Geomicrobiol J 7:67–77

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jones RE, Beeman RE, Suflita JM (1989) Anaerobic metabolic processes in deep terrestrial subsurface. Geomicrobiol J 7:117–130

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jones RE, Beeman RE, Liu S, Suflita JM (1991) Anaerobic metabolic potential in the deep subsurface. In: Fliermans CB, Hazen TC (eds) Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Microbiology of the Deep Subsurface. WSRS Information Services, Aiken, SC, pp 4:3–11

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kieft TL, Rosacker LL (1991) Application of respiration- and adenylate-based soil microbiological assays to deep subsurface terrestrial sediments. Soil Biol Biochem 23:563–568

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lovley DR, Klug MJ (1982) Intermediary metabolism of organic matter in the sediments of a eutrophic lake. Appl Environ Microbiol 43:552–560

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lovley DR, Chapelle FH, Phillips EJP (1990) Fe(III)-reducing bacteria in deeply buried sediments of the Atlantic Coastal Plain. Geology 18:954–957

    Google Scholar 

  22. Madsen EL, Bollag JM (1989) Aerobic and anaerobic microbial activity in deep subsurface sediments from the Savannah River Plant. Geomicrobiol J 7:93–101

    Google Scholar 

  23. Madsen EL, Sinclair JL, Ghiorse WC (1991) In situ biodegradation: microbiological patterns in a contaminated aquifer. Science 252:830–833

    Google Scholar 

  24. McMahon BP, Chapelle FE (1991) Microbial production of organic acids in aquitard sediments and its role in aquifer geochemistry. Nature 349:233–235

    Google Scholar 

  25. Murphy EM, Schramke JA, Fredrickson JK, Bledsoe HW, Francis AJ, Sklarew DS, Linehan JC (1992) The influence of microbial activity and sedimentary organic carbon on the isotope geochemistry of the Middendorf aquifer. Water Resour Res 28:723–740

    Google Scholar 

  26. Palumbo AV, Zaidi BR, Jardine PM, McCarthy JF (1991) The characterization and bioavailability of dissolved organic carbon in deep subsurface and surface waters. In: Fliermans CB, Hazen TC (eds) Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Microbiology of the Deep Subsurface. WSRS Information Services, Aiken, SC pp 2:57–68

    Google Scholar 

  27. Parkhurst DL, Thorstenson DC, Plummer LN (1980) PHREEQE a computer program for geochemical calculations. US Geol Survey Water Resour Invest 80–96

  28. Phelps TJ (1991) Similarity between biotransformation rates and turnover rates of organic matter biodegradation in anaerobic environments. J Microbiol Methods 13:243–254

    Google Scholar 

  29. Phelps TJ, Zeikus JG (1984) Influence of pH on terminal carbon metabolism in anoxic sediments from a mildly acidic lake. Appl Environ Microbiol 48:1088–1095

    Google Scholar 

  30. Phelps TJ, Zeikus JG (1985) Effect of fall turnover on terminal carbon metabolism in Lake Mendota sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 50:1285–1291

    Google Scholar 

  31. Phelps TJ, Fliermans CB, Garland TR, Pfiffner SM, White DC (1989) Methods for recovery of deep terrestrial subsurface sediments for microbiological studies. J Microbiol Methods 9:267–279

    Google Scholar 

  32. Phelps TJ, Raione EG, White DC, Fliermans CB (1989) Microbial activities in deep subsurface environments. Geomicrobiol J 7:79–91

    Google Scholar 

  33. Plummer DL, Busby JF, Lee RW, Hanshaw BB (1990) Geochemical modeling in the Madison aquifer in parts of Montana, Wyoming, and South Dakota. Water Resour Res 26:1981–2014

    Google Scholar 

  34. Russell BT, Phelps TJ, Griffin T, Sargent KL (1992) Procedures for sampling deep subsurface microbial communities. Groundwater Monit Rev 12:96–104

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sargent KA, Fliermans CB (1989) Geology and hydrology of the deep subsurface microbiology sampling sites at the Savannah River Plant, South Carolina. Geomicrobiol J 7:3–13

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sinclair JL, Ghiorse WC (1989) Distribution of aerobic bacteria, protozoa, algae, and fungi in deep subsurface sediments. Geomicrobiol J 7:15–32

    Google Scholar 

  37. Thorn PM, Ventullo RM (1988) Measurement of bacterial growth rates in subsurface sediments using the incorporation of tritiated thymidine into DNA. Microb Ecol 16:3–16

    Google Scholar 

  38. White DC, Bobbie RJ, King JD, Nickels J, Amoe P (1979) Lipid analysis of sediments for microbial biomass and community structure. In: Litchfield CD, Seyfried PL (eds) Methodology for biomass determinations and microbial activities in sediments. (ASTM STP 673) Philadelphia, PA American Society for Testing Materials, pp 87–103

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The submitted manuscript has been authored by a contractor of the U.S. government under contract No. DE-AC05-840R21400. Accordingly, the U.S. &. Government reserves a nonexclusive royalty-free license to publish or reproduce the published form of this contribution, or allow others to do so, for U. S. Government purposes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Phelps, T.J., Murphy, E.M., Pfiffner, S.M. et al. Comparison between geochemical and biological estimates of subsurface microbial activities. Microb Ecol 28, 335–349 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00662027

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00662027

Keywords

Navigation