Abstract
The trypsin level in bile was studied by radioimmunoassay in a prospective series of 63 patients with gallstone disease but without signs or symptoms of cholecystitis or pancreatitis in order to find indirect evidence of a retrograde flow of pancreatic juice. Mobile duct stones were present in 18 patients and impacted stones in 12. The remaining 33 patients had stones only in the gallbladder and served as controls.
The average intraoperative trypsin level of the ductal bile was normal, both in the control group and in the group with stones occluding a potential retrograde reflux of pancreatic juice. After removal of the impacted stones, the bile showed a significantly higher trypsin level. The average intraoperative trypsin level for the group with mobile stones was significantly higher than that of the control group, and was further increased 10 days postoperatively.
The trypsin level of ductal bile from 23 of the 30 patients (77%) with bile duct stones exceeded that of the 33 patients with stone-free bile ducts, indicating an inflow of pancreatic juice to the bile ducts of patients with bile duct stones. The present results correspond well to those in a previous report on retrograde phasic contractions of the sphincter of Oddi in the majority of patients with bile duct stones. This dysfunction of the sphincter, which persisted for 10 days after surgical stone removal, may be the primary disorder, probably consisting of a retrograde propulsive activity of the sphincter of Oddi.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson MC, Hauman RL, Suryapa C, Schiller WR (1979) Pancreatic enzyme levels in bile of patients with extrahepatic biliary tract disease. Am J Surg 137: 301–305
Bonora G, Tomassetti P, Sternini C, Bagnoli L, Agostini D, Vezzadini P (1980) Basal and stimulated serum immunoreactive trypsin in normal subjects. Scand J Gastroenterol 15: suppl 62: 10–14
Carr-Locke DL, Gregg JA (1981) Endoscopic manometry of pancreatic and biliary sphincter zones in man. Basal results in healthy volunteers. Dig Dis Sci 26: 7–15
Csendes A, Kruse A, Funch-Jensen P, Ornsholt J, Amdrup E (1979) Pressure measurements in the biliary and pancreatic duct systems in controls and in patients with gallstones, previous cholecystectomy, or common bile duct stones. Gastroenterology 77: 1203–1210
DeMasi E, Corraziarri E, Habib FI, Fontana B, Gatti V, Fegiz GF, Torsoli A (1984) Manometric study of the sphincter of Oddi in patients with and without common bile duct stones. Gut 25: 275–278
Geokas MC, Largman C, Brodrick W, Johnson JF (1979) Determination of human pancreatic cationic trypsinogen in serum by radioimmunoassay. Am J Physiol 5: E77-E83
Gregg JA, Carr-Locke DL (1984) Endoscopic pancreatic and biliary manometry in pancreatic, biliary and papillary disease, and after endoscopic sphincterotomy and surgical sphincteroplasty. Gut 25: 1247–1254
Guelrud M, Mendosa S, Vicent S, Gomez M, Villalta B (1983) Pressures in the sphincter of Oddi in patients with gallstones, common duct stones, and recurrent pancreatitis. J Clin Gastroenterol 5: 37–41
Lake-Bakaar G, Dooley J (1987) Biliary immunoreactive trypsin in man. Hepatogastroenterology 34: 103–105
Linder S, von Rosen A, Wiechel K-L (1993) Common bile duct pressure, hormonal influence and recurrent bile duct stones. Hepatogastroenterology 40: 370–379
Masoero G, Andriulli A, Recchia S, Marchetto M, Benititi V, Verme G (1980) Trypsin-like immunoreactivity in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. Scand J Gastroenterol 15: suppl 62: 21–25
Toouli J, Geenen JE, Hogan WJ, Dodds WJ, Arndorfer RC (1982) Sphincter of Oddi motor activity; a comparison between patients with common bile duct stones and controls. Gastroenterology 82: 111–117
Wiechel K-L (1964) Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography, 2nd ed. Acta Chir Scand Suppl 330: 67–71
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vracko, J., Zemva, Z., Pegan, V. et al. Sphincter of oddi function studied by radioimmunoassay of biliary trypsin in patients with bile duct stones and in controls. Surg Endosc 8, 389–392 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00642438
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00642438