Skip to main content
Log in

Non-Linearity and light adaptation in the fly photoreceptor

  • Published:
Journal of comparative physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    Short, dim flashes were used to investigate the properties of the photoreceptor response in the compound eye of the flyMusca domestica.

  2. 2.

    In a dark-adapted receptor cell, the latency of the response and the response peak amplitude were determined. The response amplitude increases linearly up to an intensity where 10 photons are absorbed in one cell. Above this intensity the gain of the transduction decreases.

  3. 3.

    However, even below this flash intensity the response as a whole is not linear because a significant reduction of the time-to-peak is observed in responses produced by the absorption of only four photons, and possibly even less.

  4. 4.

    These results show that a very dim adapting light also affects the time course of the response to a flash. This has been verified experimentally. Some previous authors did not detect any changes in latency through light adaptation. This anomaly is explained because these authors' lowest adapting light was bright enough to light-adapt the cell nearly completely with respect to the time-to-peak.

  5. 5.

    The implications of the ‘prebump’ hypothesis (Hamdorf and Kirschfeld 1980) are discussed and the possibility of a common mechanism responsible for the non-linearity in the dark-adapted cell and the light adaptation effects is suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

LED :

light emitting diode

References

  • Baylor DA, Hodgkin AL (1974) Changes in time scale and sensitivity in turtle photoreceptors. J Physiol (Lond) 242:729–758

    Google Scholar 

  • Baylor DA, Hodgkin AL, Lamb TD (1974a) The electrical response of turtle cones to flashes and steps of light. J Physiol (Lond) 242:685–727

    Google Scholar 

  • Baylor DA, Hodgkin AL, Lamb TD (1974b) Reconstruction of the electrical responses of turtle cones to flashes and steps of light. J Physiol (Lond) 242:759–791

    Google Scholar 

  • Borsellino A, Fuortes MGF, Smith TG (1965) Visual Responses inLimulus. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 30:429–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervetto L, Pasino E, Torre V (1977) Electrical responses of rods in the retina ofBufo marinus. J Physiol (Lond) 267:17–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubs A, Laughlin SB, Srinivasan MV (in press) Single photon signals in the fly photoreceptors and first interneurons at behavioural threshold. J Physiol (Lond)

  • French AS (1979) The effect of light adaptation on the dynamic properties of phototransduction in the fly,Phormia regina. Biol Cybern 32:115–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuortes MGF, Hodgkin AL (1964) Changes in time scale and sensitivity in the ommatidia ofLimulus. J Physiol (Lond) 172:239–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamdorf K, Kirschfeld K (1980) ‘Prebumps’: Evidence for double- hits at functional subunits in a rhabdomeric photoreceptor. Z Naturforsch [c] 35:173–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardie RC (1979) Electrophysiological analysis of fly retina. I: Comparative properties of R1-6 and R7 and R8. J Comp Physiol 129:19–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard J (1981) Temporal resolving power of the photoreceptors ofLocusta migratoria. J Comp Physiol 144:61–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Leutscher-Hazelhoff JT (1975) Linear and non-linear performance of transducer and pupil inCalliphora retinula cells. J Physiol (Lond) 246:333–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne R, Howard J (1981) The response of an insect photoreceptor: a simple lognormal model. Nature 290:415–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinter RB (1966) Sinusoidal and delta function responses of visual cells of theLimulus eye. J Gen Physiol 49:565–594

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinter RB (1972) Frequency and time domain properties of retinular cells of the desert locust (Schistocerca gregaria) and the house cricket (Achetadomestica). J Comp Physiol 77:383–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Smola U, Gemperlein R (1972) Übertragungseigenschaften der Sehzelle der SchmeissfliegeCalliphora erythrocephala. J Comp Physiol 79:363–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeltler F (1969) Die Abhängigkeit des Übertragungsverhaltens von Frequenz und Adaptationszustand; gemessen am einzelnen Lichtrezeptor vonCalliphora erythrocephala. Z Vergl Physiol 64:432–449

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Special thanks must go to Richard Payne and Joe Howard: discussions with them initiated this investigation and were most helpful throughout this work. I am also grateful to Drs. S.B. Laughlin, S.R. Shaw and M.V. Srinivasan for their critical reading of the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dubs, A. Non-Linearity and light adaptation in the fly photoreceptor. J. Comp. Physiol. 144, 53–59 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00612797

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00612797

Keywords

Navigation