Summary
-
1.
Short, dim flashes were used to investigate the properties of the photoreceptor response in the compound eye of the flyMusca domestica.
-
2.
In a dark-adapted receptor cell, the latency of the response and the response peak amplitude were determined. The response amplitude increases linearly up to an intensity where 10 photons are absorbed in one cell. Above this intensity the gain of the transduction decreases.
-
3.
However, even below this flash intensity the response as a whole is not linear because a significant reduction of the time-to-peak is observed in responses produced by the absorption of only four photons, and possibly even less.
-
4.
These results show that a very dim adapting light also affects the time course of the response to a flash. This has been verified experimentally. Some previous authors did not detect any changes in latency through light adaptation. This anomaly is explained because these authors' lowest adapting light was bright enough to light-adapt the cell nearly completely with respect to the time-to-peak.
-
5.
The implications of the ‘prebump’ hypothesis (Hamdorf and Kirschfeld 1980) are discussed and the possibility of a common mechanism responsible for the non-linearity in the dark-adapted cell and the light adaptation effects is suggested.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- LED :
-
light emitting diode
References
Baylor DA, Hodgkin AL (1974) Changes in time scale and sensitivity in turtle photoreceptors. J Physiol (Lond) 242:729–758
Baylor DA, Hodgkin AL, Lamb TD (1974a) The electrical response of turtle cones to flashes and steps of light. J Physiol (Lond) 242:685–727
Baylor DA, Hodgkin AL, Lamb TD (1974b) Reconstruction of the electrical responses of turtle cones to flashes and steps of light. J Physiol (Lond) 242:759–791
Borsellino A, Fuortes MGF, Smith TG (1965) Visual Responses inLimulus. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 30:429–443
Cervetto L, Pasino E, Torre V (1977) Electrical responses of rods in the retina ofBufo marinus. J Physiol (Lond) 267:17–52
Dubs A, Laughlin SB, Srinivasan MV (in press) Single photon signals in the fly photoreceptors and first interneurons at behavioural threshold. J Physiol (Lond)
French AS (1979) The effect of light adaptation on the dynamic properties of phototransduction in the fly,Phormia regina. Biol Cybern 32:115–123
Fuortes MGF, Hodgkin AL (1964) Changes in time scale and sensitivity in the ommatidia ofLimulus. J Physiol (Lond) 172:239–263
Hamdorf K, Kirschfeld K (1980) ‘Prebumps’: Evidence for double- hits at functional subunits in a rhabdomeric photoreceptor. Z Naturforsch [c] 35:173–174
Hardie RC (1979) Electrophysiological analysis of fly retina. I: Comparative properties of R1-6 and R7 and R8. J Comp Physiol 129:19–33
Howard J (1981) Temporal resolving power of the photoreceptors ofLocusta migratoria. J Comp Physiol 144:61–66
Leutscher-Hazelhoff JT (1975) Linear and non-linear performance of transducer and pupil inCalliphora retinula cells. J Physiol (Lond) 246:333–350
Payne R, Howard J (1981) The response of an insect photoreceptor: a simple lognormal model. Nature 290:415–416
Pinter RB (1966) Sinusoidal and delta function responses of visual cells of theLimulus eye. J Gen Physiol 49:565–594
Pinter RB (1972) Frequency and time domain properties of retinular cells of the desert locust (Schistocerca gregaria) and the house cricket (Achetadomestica). J Comp Physiol 77:383–397
Smola U, Gemperlein R (1972) Übertragungseigenschaften der Sehzelle der SchmeissfliegeCalliphora erythrocephala. J Comp Physiol 79:363–392
Zeltler F (1969) Die Abhängigkeit des Übertragungsverhaltens von Frequenz und Adaptationszustand; gemessen am einzelnen Lichtrezeptor vonCalliphora erythrocephala. Z Vergl Physiol 64:432–449
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Special thanks must go to Richard Payne and Joe Howard: discussions with them initiated this investigation and were most helpful throughout this work. I am also grateful to Drs. S.B. Laughlin, S.R. Shaw and M.V. Srinivasan for their critical reading of the manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dubs, A. Non-Linearity and light adaptation in the fly photoreceptor. J. Comp. Physiol. 144, 53–59 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00612797
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00612797