Skip to main content
Log in

Action potential adaptation in the femoral tactile spine of the cockroach,Periplaneta americana

  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    Adaptation of action potential discharge was studied in the sensory neuron of a rapidly adapting insect mechanoreceptor, the cockroach,Periplaneta americana, femoral tactile spine. Direct electrical stimulation of the neuron was achieved by passing current through a micro-electrode adjacent to the axon where it leaves the soma. Action potentials were monitored extracellularly further along the axon.

  2. 2.

    The dynamic properties of action potential generation were observed in response to steps of current and to randomly varying currents. The step and frequency responses could both be well fitted by power-laws, which were indistinguishable from the behavior observed during mechanical stimulation of the spine.

  3. 3.

    Electrical stimulation of the axon further from the soma also gave a power-law response, suggesting that this dynamic behavior reflects general properties of the axon membrane, rather than a specific initiation site.

  4. 4.

    Variations in stimulus amplitude caused large changes in the rates of adaptation to steps or random stimuli. However, these changes were in opposite directions for the two types of stimulus.

  5. 5.

    Depolarization by addition of a DC current to the stimuli caused increases in the rates of adaptation to steps and random stimuli. Hyperpolarization caused the opposite effects. Raising the external potassium concentration also increased the rates of adaptation while decreasing potassium concentration caused the opposite effects.

  6. 6.

    The results indicate that adaptation in this receptor occurs during action potential initiation. Although the adaptation is well characterized by a power-law, the parameters vary with the type of stimulus, stimulus strength, and mean polarization level. These strong nonlinearities are difficult to explain by the distributed parameter linear models which are usually invoked to account for power-law behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

rms :

root mean square

imp :

impulses

References

  • Bernard J, Guillet JC, Coillot JP (1980) Evidence for a barrier between blood and sensory terminal in an insect mechano-receptor. Comp Biochem Physiol 67A:573–579

    Google Scholar 

  • Biederman-Thorson M, Thorson J (1971) Dynamics of excitation and inhibition in the light adaptedLimulus eye. J Gen Physiol 58:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohnenberger J (1981) Matched transfer characteristics of single units in a compound slit sense organ. J Comp Physiol 142:391–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown MC, Stein RB (1966) Quantitative studies on the slowly adapting stretch receptor of the crayfish. Kybernetik 3:175–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman KM, Smith RS (1963) A linear transfer function underlying impulse frequency modulation in a cockroach mechanoreceptor. Nature 197:699–700

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman KM, Mosinger JL, Duckrow RB (1979) The role of viscoelastic coupling in sensory adaptation in an insect mechanoreceptor. J Comp Physiol 131:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesler M, Fourtner CR (1981) Mechanical properties of a slow muscle in the cockroach. J Neurobiol 12:391–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Erler G, Thurm U (1981) Dendritic impulse initiation in an epithelial sensory neuron. J Comp Physiol 142:237–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Fohlmeister JF (1973) A model for phasic and tonic repetitively firing neural encoders. Kybernetik 13:104–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Fohlmeister JF, Poppele RE, Purple RL (1977) Repetitive firing: A quantitative study of feedback in model encoders. J Gen Physiol 69:815–858

    Google Scholar 

  • French AS (1973) Automated spectral analysis of neurophysiological data using intermediate magnetic tape storage. Cornput Prog Biomed 3:45–57

    Google Scholar 

  • French AS (1980) Sensory transduction in an insect mechanoreceptor: linear and nonlinear properties. Biol Cybern 38:115–123

    Google Scholar 

  • French AS (1984a) The dynamic properties of the action potential encoder in an insect mechanosensory neuron. Biophys J 146:285–290

    Google Scholar 

  • French AS (1984b) The receptor potential and adaptation in the cockroach tactile spine. J Neurosci 4:2063–2068

    Google Scholar 

  • French AS, Holden AV (1971) Alias-free sampling of neuronal spike trains. Kybernetik 8:165–171

    Google Scholar 

  • French AS, Kuster JE (1981) Sensory transduction in an insect mechanoreceptor: extended bandwidth measurements and sensitivity to stimulus strength. Biol Cybern 42:87–94

    Google Scholar 

  • French AS, Sanders EJ (1981) The mechanosensory apparatus of the femoral tactile spine of the cockroach,Periplaneta americana. Cell Tissue Res 219:53–68

    Google Scholar 

  • French AS, Holden AV, Stein RB (1972) The estimation of the frequency response function of a mechanoreceptor. Kybernetik 11:15–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Gestrelius S, Grampp W (1983) Impulse firing in the slowly adapting stretch receptor neurone of lobster and its numerical simulation. Acta Physiol Scand 118:253–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillet JC, Bernard J, Coillot JP, Callec JJ (1980) Electrical properties of the dendrite in an insect mechanoreceptor: effects of antidromic or direct electrical stimulation. J Insect Physiol 26:755–762

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkin AL, Huxley AF (1952) A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J Physiol 117:500–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuster JE, French AS (1983) Sensory transduction in a locust multipolar joint receptor: the dynamic behavior under a variety of stimulus conditions. J Comp Physiol 150:207–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Landgren S (1953) On the excitation mechanism of the carotid baroreceptors. Acta Physiol Scand 26:1–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Landolt JP, Correia MJ (1980) Neurodynamic response analysis of anterior semicircular canal afferents in the pigeon. J Neurophysiol 43:1746–1770

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis DV, Wilson WA (1982) Calcium influx and poststimulus current during early adaptation inAplysia giant neurons. J Neurophysiol 48:202–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Marmarelis PZ, Marmarelis VZ (1978) Analysis of physiological systems, the white noise approach. Plenum Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McIver SB (1975) Structure of cuticular mechanoreceptors of arthropods. Annu Rev Entomol 20:381–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendelson M, Loewenstein WR (1964) Mechanisms of receptor adaptation. Science 144:554–555

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelis B, Chaplain RA (1973) The encoder mechanism of receptor neurons. Kybernetik 13:6–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Mountcastle VB, LaMotte RH, Carli G (1972) Detection threshold for stimuli in humans and monkeys: comparison with threshold events in mechanoreceptive afferent nerve fibres innervating monkey hand. J Neurophysiol 35:122–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakajima S, Onodera K (1969) Membrane properties of the stretch receptor neurones of crayfish with particular references to mechanisms of sensory adaptation. J Physiol 200:161–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldham KB, Spanier J (1974) The fractional calculus. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottoson D, Swerup C (1982) Studies on the role of calcium in adaptation of the crustacean stretch receptor. Effects of intracellular injection of calcium, EGTA and TEA. Brain Res 244:337–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Poppele RE, Chen WJ (1972) Repetitive firing behavior of mammalian muscle spindle. J Neurophysiol 35:357–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Pringle JWS, Wilson VJ (1952) The response of a sense organ to a harmonic stimulus. J Exp Biol 29:220–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice MJ (1975) Insect mechanoreceptor mechanisms. In: Galun R, Hillman P, Parnas I, Werman R (eds) Sensory physiology and behavior. Plenum Press, New York, pp 135–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Seyfarth E, Bohnenberger J, Thorson J (1982) Electrical and mechanical stimulation of a spider slit sensillum: outward current excites. J Comp Physiol 147:423–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolove PG, Cooke IM (1971) Inhibition of impulse activity in a sensory neuron by an electrogenic pump. J Gen Physiol 57:125–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Spekreijse H, Oosting H (1970) Linearizing: a method for analysing and synthesizing non-linear systems. Kybernetik 7:22–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorson J (1966) Small-signal analysis of a visual reflex in the locust. II. Frequency dependence. Kybernetik 3:53–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorson J, Biedermann-Thorson M (1974) Distributed relaxation phenomena in sensory adaptation. Science 183:161–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomko DL, Peterka RJ, Schor RH, O'Leary DP (1981) Response dynamics of horizontal canal afferents in barbiturate-anesthetized cats. J Neurophysiol 45:376–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallbo AB (1964) Accommodation related to inactivation of the sodium permeability in single myelinated nerve fibres fromXenopus laevis. Acta Physiol Scand 61:429–444

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

French, A.S. Action potential adaptation in the femoral tactile spine of the cockroach,Periplaneta americana . J. Comp. Physiol. 155, 803–812 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00611597

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00611597

Keywords

Navigation