Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The photosensitivity of a mutant circadian clock

  • Published:
Journal of comparative physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Konopka and Benzer (1971) produced a mutantDrosophila in which the circadian clock period is shortened by 20% and in which the maximum phase shift obtained from a saturating exposure of light is much increased. We examined the phase responses to lower energy exposures and found that in almost every aspect examined they are remarkably similar to those found inD. pseudoobscura, the only other fly examined in detail. In particular, theD. melanogaster mutant, unlike the wildtype, can be given an exposure of light of a critical energy at a critical phase which results in nearly complete loss of rhythmicity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chandrashekaran, M.K., Loher, W.: The relationship between the intensity of light pulses and the extent of phase shifts of the circadian rhythm in the eclosion rate ofDrosophila pseudoobscura. J. exp. Zool.172, 147–152 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelmann, W.: Phase shifting of eclosion inDrosophila pseudoobscura as a function of the energy of the light pulse. Z. vergl. Physiol.64, 111–117 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelmann, W., Karlsson, H.G., Johnsson, A.: Phase shifts in theKalanchoe petal rhythm, caused by light pulses of different durations. Int. J. Chronobiol.1, 147–156 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Guckenheimer, J.: Isochrons and phaseless sets. J. math. Biol.1, 259–273 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalmus, H., Wigglesworth, L.A.: Shock-excited systems as models for biological rhythms. Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol.25, 211–216 (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaus, P.: Possible adaptive values of the resonant slave in biological clocks. J. theor. Biol.61, 249–265 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Konopka, R.J.: Circadian clock mutants ofDrosophila melanogaster, Ph. D. thesis, California Institute of Technology (1972)

  • Konopka, R.J., Benzer, S.: Clock mutants ofDrosophila melanogaster. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.)68, 2112–2116 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlidis, T.: A model for circadian clocks. Bull. math. Biophys.29, 781–791 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pittendrigh, C.S.: Temporal organization in living systems. Harvey Lect.59, 93–125 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pittendrigh, C.S.: Circadian oscillations in cells and the circadian organization of multicellular systems. In: The neurosciences: A third study program (ed. F.O. Schmitt, F.G. Worden) pp. 437–458. Cambridge: MIT Press 1974

    Google Scholar 

  • Pittendrigh, C.S., Bruce, V.G., Kaus, P.: On the significance of transients in daily rhythms. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.)44, 965–967 (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, D.S.: The circadian eclosion rhythm inSarcophaga argyrostoma: comparisons with the photoperiodic clock. J. comp. Physiol.110, 111–133 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Winfree, A.T.: Biological rhythms and the behavior of populations of coupled oscillators. J. theor. Biol.16, 15–42 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • Winfree, A.T.: An integrated view of the resetting of a circadian clock. J. theor. Biol.28, 327–374 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Winfree, A.T.: On the photosensitivity of the circadian time sense inDrosophila pseudoobscura. J. theor. Biol.35, 159–189 (1972a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Winfree, A.T.: Slow dark adaptation inDrosophila's circadian clock. J. comp. Physiol.77, 418–434 (1972b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Winfree, A.T.: The investigation of oscillatory processes by perturbation experiments. In: Biophysical and biochemical oscillators (eds. B. Chance, E.K. Pye, B. Hess), pp. 461–501. Academic Press (1968 symposium) (1973a)

  • Winfree, A.T.: Resetting the amplitude of Drosophila's circadian chronometer. J. comp. Physiol.85, 105–140 (1973b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Winfree, A.T.: SuppressingDrosophila's circadian rhythm with dim light. Science183, 970–972 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Winfree, A.T.: Patterns of phase compromise in biological cycles. J. math. Biol.1, 73–95 (1975a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Winfree, A.T.: Unclocklike behavior of biological clocks. Nature253, 215–219 (1975b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Winfree, A.T.: On phase resetting in multicellular clockshops. In: The molecular basis of circadian rhythms (eds. J.W. Hastings, H.-G. Schweiger) Berlin-Dahlem 1976

  • Zimmerman, W.F., Goldsmith, T.H.: Photosensitivity of the circadian rhythm and of visual receptors in carotenoid-depletedDrosophila. Science183, 970–972 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, 47907, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA

    A. T. Winfree & H. Gordon

Authors
  1. A. T. Winfree
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. Gordon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

We thank R. Konopka for the flies. A.T. Winfree thanks the N.S.F. for grant BMS 73 0688 and the N.I.H. for a research career development award.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Winfree, A.T., Gordon, H. The photosensitivity of a mutant circadian clock. J. Comp. Physiol. 122, 87–109 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00611250

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00611250

Keywords

Search

Navigation