Skip to main content
Log in

Discrimination of surface-structured targets by the echolocating batMyotis myotis during flight

  • Published:
Journal of comparative physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    Myotis myotis was trained to discriminate a plate with 8 mm deep holes from plates of stepwise varied hole depth. Depth differences in the two plates equal or larger than 1 mm were discriminated by the echolocating bat (Fig. 3).

  2. 2.

    In a second series of experiments a plate with 4 mm deep holes was discriminated from other plates with hole depth differences equal or larger than 0.8 mm (Fig. 3).

  3. 3.

    Echolocation sounds emitted during discrimination are of the same type as those used for catching prey in air or on the ground (Fig. 2). With increasing difficulty of the discrimination task the flight speed of the bat was reduced (Fig. 1).

  4. 4.

    An incidental experiment disclosed the ability to discriminate surface structures with the resolution of roughness produced by 30 μm protrusions in the surface (Fig. 4).

  5. 5.

    We conclude thatMyotis myotis discriminated hole depth differences by spectral, and not by time, cues in the echoes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altes RA, Titlebaum EL (1970) Bat signals as optimally Doppler tolerant waveforms. J Acoust Soc Am 48:1014–1020

    Google Scholar 

  • Beuter K (1980) A new concept of echo evaluation in the auditory system of bats. In: Busnel RG, Fish J (eds) Animal sonar systems. Plenum Press, New York, pp 747–762

    Google Scholar 

  • Habersetzer J (1978) Ortungslaute der Mausohrfledermäuse (Myotis myotis) in verschiedenen Ortungssituationen. Masters thesis, University of Frankfurt

  • Harnischfeger G (1980) Brainstem units of echolocating bats coding binaural time differences in the microsecond-range. Naturwissenschaften 67:314–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RA (1980) Energy spectrum analysis in echolocation. In: Busnel RG, Fish J (eds) Animal sonar systems. Plenum Press, New York, pp 673–693

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuweiler G, Bruns V, Schuller G (1980) Ears adapted for the detection of motion, or how echolocating bats have exploited the capacities of the mammalian auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 68:741–753

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons JA (1979) Perception of echo phase information in bat sonar. Science 204:1336–1338

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons JA (1980) The processing of sonar echoes by bats. In: Busnel RG, Fish J (eds) Animal sonar systems. Plenum Press, New York, pp 695–714

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons JA, Lavender WA, Lavender BA, Doroshow CA, Kiefer SW, Livingston R, Scallet AC (1974) Target structure and echo spectral discrimination by echolocating bats. Science 186:1130–1132

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Habersetzer, J., Vogler, B. Discrimination of surface-structured targets by the echolocating batMyotis myotis during flight. J. Comp. Physiol. 152, 275–282 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00611192

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00611192

Keywords

Navigation