Skip to main content
Log in

Visually controlled station-keeping by hovering guard bees ofTrigona (Tetragonisca) angustula (Apidae, Meliponinae)

  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    Guard bees of the stingless beeTrigona (Tetragonisca) angustula typically hover in very stable positions on both sides of and close to the nest entrance; for most of the time they face the flight corridor or the nest entrance (Fig. 2). Individual bees occupy a distinct airspace which they can leave for short excursions but return to afterwards (Fig. 3). When they change their position, they adjust their body-axis orientation to keep the nest entrance within their frontal visual field (Fig. 4). The accuracy of station-keeping decreases with the distance from the nest (Fig. 5).

  2. 2.

    Guard bees stay tightly coupled to the nest when the whole nestbox is oscillated through 20 cm forward and sideways with respect to the direction in which the nest entrance is pointing. They hold their position and distance relative to the nest entrance by flying forward, backward and sideways while keeping the angular orientation of their body long axis constant for most of the time (Figs. 6, 7). They temporarily lag behind the nest movement when they actively change their angular orientation or when the nest moves away from them. After the movement of the nest stops, bees which have lagged behind regain hovering stations close to the nest (Fig. 8).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Buchner E (1984) Behavioural analysis of spatial vision in insects. In: Ali MA (ed) Photoreception and vision in invertebrates. Plenum Press, New York, pp 561–621

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright BA, Collett TS (1983) Landmark learning in bees. J Comp Physiol 151:521–543

    Google Scholar 

  • Collett TS (1980) Some operating rules for the optomotor system of a hoverfly during voluntary flight. J Comp Physiol 138:271–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Collett TS, Land MF (1975a) Visual control of flight behaviour in the hoverflySyritta pipiens L. J Comp Physiol 99:1–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Collett TS, Land MF (1975b) Visual spatial memory in a hoverfly. J Comp Physiol 100:59–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Egelhaaf M, Hausen K, Reichardt W, Wehrhahn C (1988) Visual course control in flies relies on neuronal computation of object and background motion. TINS 11:351–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson G (1985) Swarming behaviour of the mosquitoCulex pipiens quinquefasciatus: a quantitative analysis. Physiol Entomol 10:283–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Götz KG (1975) The optomotor equilibrium of theDrosophila navigation system. J Comp Physiol 99:187–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruhl K (1924) Paarungsgewohnheiten der Dipteren. Z Wiss Zool 122:205–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Hengstenberg R, Sandeman DC, Hengstenberg B (1986) Compensatory head roll in the blowflyCalliphora during flight. Proc R Soc Lond B 227:455–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Junger W, Dahmen H-J (1986) Visually induced drift compensation in waterstriders. Verh Deutsche Zool Ges 79:217

    Google Scholar 

  • Junger W, Dahmen H-J (1988) Waterstriders (Gerridae) use visual landmarks to compensate for drift on a moving water surface. In: Elsner N, Barth FG (eds) Sense organs. Thieme, Stuttgart New York, pp 35

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenderink JJ (1986) Optic flow. Vision Res 26:161–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenderink JJ, Doom AJ van (1987) Facts on optic flow. Biol Cybern 56:247–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Nalbach H-O, Nalbach G (1987) Distribution of optokinetic sensitivity over the eye of crabs: its relation to habitat and possible role in flow-field analysis. J Comp Physiol A 160:127–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Preiss R (1987) Motion parallax and figural properties of depth control flight speed in an insect. Biol Cybern 57:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehner R (1981) Spatial vision in arthropods. In: Autrum H (ed) Vision in invertebrates (Handbook of sensory physiology, vol VII 6C). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 287–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenk P (1965) Über die Biologie blutsaugender Simuliiden (Diptera). II. Schwarmverhalten, Geschlechterfindung und Kopulation. Z Morphol Ökol Tiere 55:671–713

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittmann D (1985) Aerial defense of the nest by workers of the stingless beeTrigona (Tetragonisca) angustula (Latreille) (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 16:111–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittmann D, Radtke R, Zeil J, Lübke G, Francke W (in press) Robberbees (Lestrimelitta limao) and their host: chemical and visual cues in nest defense byTrigona (Tetragonisca) angustula (Apidae: Meliponinae). J Chem Ecol

  • Zeil J (1986) The territorial flight of male houseflies (Fannia canicularis L.). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19:213–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeil J, Wittmann D (1987) Visual orientation towards the nest in a stingless bee (Tetragonisca angustula). In: Eder J, Rembold H (eds) Chemistry and biology of social insects. J Peperny, München, pp 706–707

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zeil, J., Wittmann, D. Visually controlled station-keeping by hovering guard bees ofTrigona (Tetragonisca) angustula (Apidae, Meliponinae). J. Comp. Physiol. 165, 711–718 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00611002

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00611002

Keywords

Navigation