Skip to main content
Log in

The response of theOctopus angular acceleration receptor system to sinusoidal stimulation

  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The nine crista/cupula sections (C1–C9) that form the angular acceleration receptor system ofOctopus vulgaris can be divided into two subsystems on the basis of cupula size. Electrophysiological recordings were made from representatives (C1 and C2) of these two sub-systems to determine their functional response characteristics.

  1. 1.

    With the statocyst stationary in the normal upright position, 62% of the afferent units from erista section C2, which has a large cupula, displayed a resting level of activity. None of the afferent units from erista section C1, which has a small cupula, showed resting activity.

  2. 2.

    The dynamic responses of the C1 and C2 units were examined during sinusoidal oscillations of the statocyst in the pitch plane at stimulus frequencies between 0.01 and 1.6 Hz, and with amplitudes between 3° and 35°. Both the C1 and C2 units showed linear increases in their responses with increasing stimulus amplitudes (Fig. 5). The threshold frequency at which a unit first responded was found to be an order of magnitude lower for the C2 units in comparison to the C1 units (Fig. 9). At a stimulus frequency of 1.6 Hz, 40% of the C2 units showed a saturation in their responses. None of the C1 units showed signs of response saturation at this frequency.

  3. 3.

    The gain values of the C1 and C2 units decreased with increasing stimulus frequency; the C1 values were higher than the C2 values (Fig. 7). The phase lag values, with respect to peak angular acceleration, were lower for C2 units compared with C1 units (Fig. 8). The phase lag values of both types of unit increased with increasing stimulus frequency but, in the middle frequency range, showed a plateau level at 100° for the C1 units and between 80° and 90° for the C2 units (Fig. 8). This indicates that in the middle frequency range the units code angular velocity. Both phase and gain values were affected by changes in the orientation of the statocyst with respect to gravity (Fig. 12).

  4. 4.

    All of the units analysed in this report originated from ventrally polarized receptor cells. However, during large amplitude oscillations, responses from dorsally polarized receptor units were also observed (Fig. 13).

  5. 5.

    These results demonstrate that the octopus angular acceleration receptor system is divided into two sub-systems of differing sensitivities and that the dynamic response characteristics of the system show close parallels with those of the vertebrate semicircular canal system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson JH, Blanks RHI, Precht W (1978) Response characteristics of semicircular canal and otolith systems in cat. 1 Dynamic responses of primary vestibular fibres. Exp Brain Res 32:491–507

    Google Scholar 

  • Anliker M, Buskirk W van (1971) The role of perilymph in the response of the semicircular canals to angular accelerations. Acta Otolaryngol 72:93–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber VC (1968) The structure of mollusc statocysts, with particular reference to cephalopods. Symp Zool Soc Lond 23:37–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanks RHI, Precht W (1976) Functional characterization of primary vestibular afferents in the frog. Exp Brain Res 25:369–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Budelmann BU (1970) Die Arbeitsweise der Statolithenorgane vonOctopus vulgaris. Z Vergl Physiol 70:278–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Budelmann BU (1976) Equilibrium receptor systems in molluscs. In: Mill PJ (ed) Structure and function of proprioceptors in the invertebrates. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 529–566

    Google Scholar 

  • Budelmann BU (1977) Structure and function of the angular acceleration receptor systems in the statocysts of cephalopods. Symp Zool Soc Lond 38:309–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Budelmann BU, Wolff HG (1973) Gravity response from angular acceleration receptors inOctopus vulgaris. J Comp Physiol 85:283–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Budelmann BU, Sachse M, Staudigl M (1985) The angular acceleration receptor system of the statocyst ofOctopus vulgaris: Morphometry, ultrastructure, and neuronal and synaptic organization. Phil Trans R Soc Lond (in press)

  • Dijkgraaf S (1961) The statocyst ofOctopus vulgaris as a rotation receptor. Publ Staz Zool Napoli 32:64–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez C, Goldberg JM (1971) Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating semicircular canals of the squirrel monkey. II. Response to sinusoidal stimulation and dynamics of peripheral vestibular system. J Neurophysiol 34:661–675

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg JM, Fernandez C (1971) Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating semicircular canals of the squirrel monkey. III. Variations among units in their discharge properties. J Neurophysiol 34:676–684

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg JM, Fernandez C (1977) Conduction times and background discharge of vestibular afferents. Brain Res 112:545–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Govardovskii VI (1971) Some characteristics and dynamics of the endolymph in cephalopod statocysts. J Evol Biochem Physiol 7:347–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Groen JJ, Lowenstein O, Vendrik AJH (1952) The mechanical analysis of the responses of the horizontal semicircular canal in the isolated labyrinth. J Physiol 117:329–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann R, Klinke R (1980) Discharge properties of afferent fibres of the goldfish semicircular canal with high frequency stimulation. Pflügers Arch 388:111–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Henn V, Cohen B, Young LR (1980) Visual-vestibular interaction in motion perception and the generation of nystagmus. Neurosci Res Prog Bull 18:459–651

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones MG, Milsum JH (1970) Characteristics of neural transmission from the semicircular canal to the vestibular nuclei of cats. J Physiol 209:295–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller EL (1976) Behaviour of horizontal semicircular canal afferents in alert monkey during vestibular and optokinetic stimulation. Exp Brain Res 24:459–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Landolt JP, Correia MJ (1980) Neurodynamic response analysis of anterior semicircular canal afferents in the pigeon. J Neurophysiol 43:1746–1770

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis AW, Kimm J (1976) The responses of 8th nerve fibres to horizontal sinusoidal oscillation in alert monkey. Exp Brain Res 24:447–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddock L, Young JZ (1984) Some dimensions of the angular acceleration receptor systems of cephalopods. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 64:55–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana HR, Sperling S (1963) Unidirectional response to angular acceleration recorded from the middle erista nerve in the statocyst ofOctopus vulgaris. Nature 197:815–816

    Google Scholar 

  • Messenger JB (1969) The effects on locomotion of lesions to the visuo-motor system inOctopus. Proc R Soc Lond B 167:252–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Milsum JH (1966) Biological control systems analysis. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Leary DP, Dunn RF, Honrubia V (1974) Functional and anatomical correlation of afferent responses from the isolated semicircular canal. Nature 251:225–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Precht W (1978) Neuronal operations in the vestibular system. Studies of brain function, vol 2. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandeman DC, Okajima A (1972) Statocyst-induced eye movements in the crabScylla serrata. I. The sensory input from the statocysts. J Exp Biol 57:187–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens PR, Young JZ (1978) Semicircular canals in squids. Nature 271:444–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinnikov YaA, Gasenko OG, Bronstein AA, Tsirulis TP, Ivanov VP, Pyatkina GA (1967) Structural, cytochemical and functional organization of statocysts of Cephalopoda. Symposium of neurobiology of invertebrates: 29–48. Akadamiai Kiado, Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson VJ, Jones GM (1979) Mammalian vestibular physiology. Plenum, New York London

    Google Scholar 

  • Young JZ (1960) The statocyst ofOctopus vulgaris. Proc R Soc Lond B 152:3–29

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Williamson, R., Budelmann, B.U. The response of theOctopus angular acceleration receptor system to sinusoidal stimulation. J. Comp. Physiol. 156, 403–412 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00610733

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00610733

Keywords

Navigation