Summary
Ether-induced avoidance of the center of an arena by a walking fly does not seem to be the outcome of at least two post-narcotic effects of ether vapor: the inactivation of acetylcholinesterase (Gage et al. 1979), and the inactivation of locomotion (van Dijken et al. 1977). The latter is actually due to a change in the action pattern of search and search control. The centrophobism arising either irreversibly in response to ether treatment, or reversibly in the course of accommodation to a new territory, increases the probability of brief stops at the outer boundary of the arena (Figs. 2–4).
Acquisition and maintenance of ‘orientedness’ by exploration of the available territory or evaluation of sensory aids to orientation appears indispensible if a fly wants to avoid the center of the arena. However, centrophobism can be explained without assumption of voluntary behavior. Persistence of direction during random walk in the arena is sufficient to divert locomotor activity from the center to the surround (Figs. 5, 6). The centrophobism found, so far, is equivalent to a ‘mean free path’ of about 4 cm in etherized flies, and about 2 cm in non-etherized flies (Table 1). Search control by variation of persistence in the track of a fly is compatible with results obtained in other insects.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ashburner M, Thompson JN jr (1978) I. The laboratory culture ofDrosophila. In: Ashburner M, Wright TRF (eds) The genetics and biology ofDrosophila 2a:1–109. Academic Press, London New York San Francisco
Benzer S (1971) From the gene to behavior. J Am Med Assoc 218:1015–1022
Bülthoff H, Götz KG, Herre M (1982) Recurrent inversion of visual orientation in the walking fly,Drosophila melanogaster. J Comp Physiol 148:471–481
Connolly K (1966) Locomotor activity inDrosophila. II. Selection for active and inactive strains. Anim Behav 14:444–449
Deery BJ, Parsons PA (1972) Ether resistance inDrosophila melanogaster. Theor Appl Genet 42:208–214
Dijken FR van, Sambeek MJPW van, Scharloo W (1977) Influence of anaesthesia by carbon dioxide and ether on locomotor activity inDrosophila melanogaster. Experientia 33:1360–1361
Ewing AW (1963) Attempts to select for spontaneous activity inDrosophila melanogaster. Anim Behav 11:369–378
Fischbach KF (1979) Simultaneous and successive colour contrast expressed in ‘slow’ phototactic behavior of walkingDrosophila melanogaster. J Comp Physiol 130:161–171
Gage PW, Hamill OP, Helden D van (1979) Dual effects of ether on end-plate currents. J Physiol 287:353–369
Götz KG (1983) Genetic defects of visual orientation inDrosophila. Verh Dtsch Zool Ges 1983:83–99
Götz KG, Biesinger R (1985) Centrophobism inDrosophila melanogaster. I. Behavioral modification induced by ether. J Comp Physiol A 156:319–327
Greenspan RJ, Finn JA jr, Hall JC (1980) Acetylcholinesterase mutants inDrosophila and their effects on the structure and function of the central nervous system. J Comp Neurol 189:741–774
Grossfield J (1978) Non-sexual behavior ofDrosophila. In: Ashburner M, Wright TRF (eds) The genetics and biology ofDrosophila 2b:1–126. Academic Press, London New York San Francisco
Hall JC, Greenspan RJ, Harris WA (1982) Genetic neurobiology, MIT Press, Cambridge London
Ho MW, Tucker C, Keeley D, Saunders PT (1983) Effects of successive generations of ether treatment on penetrance and expression of the bithorax phenocopy inDrosophila melanogaster. J Exp Zool 225:357–368
Hoffmann G (1983) Optimization of Brownian search strategies. Biol Cybern 49:21–31
Ikeda K (1974) Patterned motor activities released by anesthetics. Proc Int Union Phys Sci 11:160
Ikeda K, Kaplan WD (1974) Neurophysiological genetics inDrosophila melanogaster. Am Zool 14:1055–1066
Kalmus H (1942) Narcosis and asphyxiation in some species and mutants ofDrosophila. J Exp Biol 19:238–254
Kaplan WD (1972) Genetic and behavioral studies ofDrosophila neurological mutants. In: Kiger JA jr (ed) The biology of behavior. Oregon State University Press, Oregon
Kidd KK (1963) Es: ether sensitive mutant ofDrosophila melanogaster. Drosophila Inf Serv 37:49
Lopatina NG, Marshin VG, Nikitina JA, Ponomarenko VV, Smirnova GP, Sogrin VV, Chesnokova EG (1980) Rate of ether narcosis in relation to insect behavior: a neurophysiological trait. Genetika 16:309–317 (in Russian)
Montijn C, Dijken FR van, Boer MH den, Scharloo W (1974) Apparatus for a measurement of locomotor activity inDrosophila. Drosophila Inf Serv 51:151
Moorhouse JE, Fosbrooke JHM, Kennedy JS (1978) ‘Paradoxical driving’ of walking activity in locusts. J Exp Biol 72:1–16
Ogaki M, Nakashima-Tanaka E, Murakami S (1967) Inheritance of ether resistance inDrosophila melanogaster. Jpn J Genet 42:387–394
Ogaki M, Nabata H, Nakashima-Tanaka E, Gamo S (1980) Ether sensitivity at embryonic stage ofDrosophila melanogaster. Drosophila Inf Serv 55:117
Parkash O (1971) The behavioral changes produced by thymidine-induced temperature-sensitive lethal factors inDrosophila melanogaster. Drosophila Inf Serv 46:67
Peterson PA (1947) A sex-linked character expressed as ethersensitive (es). Drosophila Inf Serv 21:88
Powell JR, Dobzhansky T (1976) How far do flies fly? Am Sci 64:179–185
Rasmuson B (1955) A nucleo-cytoplasmic anomaly inDrosophila melanogaster causing increased sensitivity to anaesthetics. Hereditas 41:147–208
Richards CD (1976) Anaesthetic mechanisms. Nature 262:534
Ringo JM (1971) The effects of anaesthetization upon survival and behavior ofDrosophila grimshavi. Drosophila Inf Serv 47:118–119
Sewell DF (1979) Effect of temperature and density variation on locomotor activity inDrosophila melanogaster: a comparison of behavioural measures. Anim Behav 27:312–313
Skrzipek KH, Kröner B, Hager H (1979) Laboratory studies on aggression inDrosophila melanogaster. Z Tierpsychol 49:87–103
Syrjämäki J (1962) Humidity perception inDrosophila melanogaster. Ann Zool Soc Vanamo 23:1–72
Venard R, Pichon Y (1981) Étude électro-antennographique de réponse périphérique de l'antenne deDrosophila melanogaster à des stimulations odorantes. CR Acad Sci Paris 293:839–842
Watson JE, Scheinberg E (1965) The effects of anesthetization inDrosophila melanogaster. Genetics 52:483
Watson JE, Scheinberg E, Dittmar LA (1965) Effects of ether on fitness traits. Drosophila Inf Serv 40:64
Wehner R (1981) Spatial vision in arthropods. In: Autrum H (ed) Comparative physiology and evolution of vision in invertebrates. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York (Handbook of sensory physiology, vol VII/6C, pp 287–616)
Wigglesworth VB (1941) The sensory physiology of the human lousePediculus humanus corporis De Geer (Anoplura). Parasitol 33:67–109
Wijsman EM (1981) The effect of ether on mating behavior inDrosophila simulans y w. Drosophila Inf Serv 56:158
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Götz, K.G., Biesinger, R. Centrophobism inDrosophila melanogaster . J. Comp. Physiol. 156, 329–337 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00610726
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00610726