Summary
Details in the stridulatory movement ofGryllus campestris were investigated using an improved high resolution miniature angle measurement system. The following results were obtained: During the closing (sound producing) stroke, the speed of the plectrum always has the same value (within measuring accuracy) at a given position. Plectrum speed is directly proportional to tooth spacing, which is known to vary along the file. The only exception to this rule were occasions when closing velocities of precisely 2 times the standard value were found. In between values were never recorded. While temperature has a large effect on the opening speed and duration, the closing speed has a very smallQ 10 (0.07) which is equal to theQ 10 of the resonance frequency of the harp. When the harps are removed, the proportionality between tooth spacing and scraper velocity is lost; the velocity is much increased (up to 3-fold) and the variance of the speed is enhanced 5-fold.
These results are discussed with respect to 3 hypothetical models explaining the function of the sound generator system. The model describing the cricket sound generator as a clockwork with an escapement system is capable of accommodating all experimental data without any extra assumptions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bailey W, Broughton WB (1970) The mechanics of stridulation in bush crickets (Tettigonioidea, Orthoptera). J Exp Biol 52:507–517
Bailey WJ, Stephen RO (1984) Auditory acuity in the orientation behavior of the bushcricketPachysagella australis Walker (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae, Saginae). Anim Behav 32:816–829
Bennet-Clark HC (1970) The mechanism and efficiency of sound production in mole crickets. J Exp Biol 52:619–652
Doherty JA (1985) Temperature coupling and ‘trade-off’ phenomena in the acoustic communication system of the cricket,Gryllus bimaculatus de Geer (Gryllidae). J Exp Biol 114:17–35
Dumortier B (1963) The physical characteristics of sound emissions in Arthropoda. In: Busnel RG (ed) Acoustic behaviour of animals. Elsevier Publishing Company, Amsterdam London New York, pp 346–373
Elliott CJH, Koch UT (1983) Sensory feedback stabilizing reliable stridulation in the field cricketGryllus campestris L. Anim Behav 31:887–901
Elliott CJH, Koch UT (1985) The clockwork cricket. Naturwissenschaften 72:150–152
Elsner N, Popov AV (1978) Neuroethology of acoustic communication. Adv Insect Physiol 13:229–355
Gazeley WJ (1975) Clock and watch escapements. 2nd edn. Butterworth, London
Huber F (1955) Sitz und Bedeutung nervöser Zentren für Instinkthandlungen beim Männchen vonGryllus campestris L. Z Tierpsychol 12:12–48
Koch UT (1980) Analysis of cricket stridulation using miniature angle detectors. J Comp Physiol 136:247–256
Koch UT, Elliott CJH (1982) Miniature angle detectors — principles and improved evaluation methods. In: Nachtigall W (ed) Biona-Report 2. Akad Wiss Mainz. Fischer, Stuttgart New York, pp 41–50
Kutsch W (1969) Neuromusculäre Aktivität bei verschiedenen Verhaltensweisen von drei Grillenarten. Z Vergl Physiol 63:335–378
Nocke H (1971) Biophysik der Schallerzeugung durch die Vorderflügel der Grillen. Z Vergl Physiol 74:272–314
Pasquinelly F, Busnel M-C (1954) Etudes preliminaires sur les mécanismes de la production des sons par les Orthoptères. Ann Epiphytes 1954:145–153
Pierce GW (1948) The songs of insects. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Regen J (1913) Über die Anlockung des Weibchens vonGryllus campestris L. durch telephonisch übertragene Stridulationslaute des Männchens. Pflügers Arch 155:193–200
Schaffner KH (1985) Mechanorezeptoren auf den Vorderflügeln der Grillenmännchen und ihre Bedeutung bei der Stridulation. Dissertation, Universität München
Schaffner KH, Koch UT (1987) Effects of wing campaniform sensilla lesions on stridulation in crickets. J Exp Biol (in press)
Sales GD, Pye JD (1974) Ultrasonic communication by animals. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 98–148
Schelleng JC (1974) The physics of the bowed string. Sci Am 230:87–95
Suga N (1966) Ultrasonic production and its reception in some neotropical Tettigoniidae. J Insect Physiol 12:1039–1050
Walker TJ (1962) Factors responsible for intra-specific variation in the calling song of crickets. Evolution 16:407–428
Zippelius HM (1949) Die Paarungsbiologie einiger Orthopteren-Arten. Z Tierpsychol 6:372–390
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koch, U.T., Elliott, C.J.H., Schäffner, K.H. et al. The mechanics of stridulation of the cricketGryllus campestris . J. Comp. Physiol. 162, 213–223 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00606086
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00606086