Skip to main content
Log in

Movement as a specific stimulus for prey catching behaviour in rhinolophid and hipposiderid bats

  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    The echolocating ‘long CF/FM-bat’Rhinolophus rouxi and the ‘short CF/FM-bats’Hipposideros bicolor andHipposideros speoris were tested for catching responses to moving and non-moving targets.

  2. 2.

    Under our experimental conditions (freshly caught caged bats in a natural environment)Rhinolophus rouxi andHipposideros speoris only responded to insects of any sort that were beating their wings. The bats showed no reactions whatsoever to nonmoving insects or those walking on the floor or the sides of the cage.

  3. 3.

    Hipposideros bicolor responded in the same way as the above species to wingbeating insects but in addition also attacked walking insects. In 27 presentations 15 walking insects were caught (Fig. 2).

  4. 4.

    Rhinolophus rouxi, Hipposideros speoris andHipposideros bicolor also detected, approached and seized tethered cockroaches hanging from the ceiling when these were vibrating up and down (Fig. 3). This indicates that any oscillating movement and not specific aspects of wing beating were the key releasers for catching behaviour in all three species. However, a wing beating insect is strongly preferred over a vibrating one in all three species (Fig. 4).

  5. 5.

    Rhinolophus rouxi, Hipposideros speoris andHipposideros bicolor attacked and seized a dead bait when it was associated with a wing beating device (Fig. 1). All three species responded effectively to beat frequencies as low as 10 beats/s (peak-to-peak amplitude of the wing excursion 20 mm). For lower frequencies the response rates rapidly deteriorated (Fig. 5).

  6. 6.

    Horseshoe bats no longer responded to wing beats of 5 beats/s when the wing beat amplitude was 2 to 1 mm or to wing beats of 2 to 1 beats/s when the amplitude was 3 mm or lower (Fig. 6). This suggests that the speed of the wing is a critical parameter. From these data we infer that the threshold for the catching responses is at a wing speed of about 2 to 1 cm/s.

  7. 7.

    In horseshoe bats (experimental tests) and the two hipposiderid species (behavioural observations) one single wing beat was enough to elicit a catching response (Fig. 8).

  8. 8.

    It is concluded that ‘long’ and ‘short’ CF/ FM-bats feature a similar responsiveness to fluttering targets. The sensitivity to oscillating movements is considered as an effective detection mechanism for any sort of potential prey.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CF :

constant frequency

FM :

frequency modulated

References

  • Bell GP (1982) Behavioral and ecological aspects of gleaning by a desert insectivorous bat,Antrozous pallidus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 10:217–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell GP, Fenton MB (1984) The use of Doppler-shifted echoes as a flutter detection and clutter rejection system: the echolocation and feeding behavior ofHipposideros ruber (Chiroptera: Hipposideridae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 15:109–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler J (1979) Prey catching with and without echolocation in the Indian False Vampire (Megaderma lyra). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 6:155–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman LJ, Henson OW (1977) Prey recognition and selection by the constant frequency bat,Pteronotus p. parnellii. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:411–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinnell AD, Hagiwara S (1972) Adaptations of the auditory nervous system for echolocation. Z Vergl Physiol 76:41–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Guppy A, Coles R (submitted) Acoustical and neural aspects of hearing in the Australian gleaning bats,Macroderma gigas (Microchiroptera: Megadermatidae) andNyctophilus gouldi (Microchiroptera: Verspertilionidae). J Comp Physiol A

  • Gustafson Y, Schnitzler HU (1979) Echolocation and obstacle avoidance in the hipposiderid batAsellia tridens. J Comp Physiol 131:161–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Habersetzer J (1982) Untersuchungen zur Echoortung und zur Ökologie der Fledermäuse in Madurai. Diss Fachber Biol Univ Frankfurt

  • Habersetzer J, Schuller G, Neuweiler G (1984) Foraging behavior and Doppler shift compensation in echolocating hipposiderid bats,Hipposideros bicolor andHipposideros speoris. J Comp Physiol A 155:559–567

    Google Scholar 

  • Jen PH-S, Suthers RA (1982) Responses of inferior collicular neurons to acoustic stimuli in certain FM and CF-FM paleotropical bats. J Comp Physiol 146:423–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuweiler G (1970) Neurophysiologische Untersuchungen zum Echoortungssystem der Großen HufeisennaseRhinolophus ferrumequinum. Z Vergl Physiol 67:273–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuweiler G (1983) Echolocation and adaptivity to ecological constraints. In: Huber F, Markl H (eds) Neuroethology and behavioral physiology: Roots and growing points. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 280–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuweiler G, Bruns V, Schuller G (1980) Ears adapted for the detection of motion, or how echolocating bats have exploited the capacities of the mammalian auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 68:741–753

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuweiler G, Metzner W, Heilmann U, Rübsamen R, Costa HH (submitted) Foraging behaviour and echolocation in the rufous horseshoe bat,Rhinolophus rouxi, of Sri Lanka. Behav Ecol Sociobiol

  • Neuweiler G, Singh S, Sripathi K (1984) Audiograms of a South Indian bat community. J Comp Physiol A 154:133–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostwald J (1984) Tonotopical organization and pure tone response characteristics of single units in the auditory cortex of the Greater Horseshoe Bat. J Comp Physiol A 155:821–834

    Google Scholar 

  • Pye JD (1980) Echolocation signals and echoes in air. In: Busnel RG, Fish JF (eds) Animal sonar systems. Plenum Press, New York London, pp 309–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzler HU (1968) Die Ultraschall-Ortungslaute der Hufeisen-Fledermäuse (Chiroptera-Rhinolophidae) in verschiedenen Orientierungssituationen. Z Vergl Physiol 57:376–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzler HU, Flieger E (1983) Detection of oscillating target movements by echolocation in the Greater Horseshoe bat. J Comp Physiol 153:385–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzler HU, Menne D, Kober R, Heblich K (1983) The acoustical image of fluttering insects in echolocating bats. In: Huber F, Markl H (eds) Neuroethology and behavioral physiology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 235–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuller G (1972) Echoortung beiRhinolophus ferrumequinum mit frequenzmodulierten Lauten. Evoked potentials im Colliculus inferior. J Comp Physiol 77:306–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuller G (1980) Hearing characteristics of Doppler shift compensation of South Indian CF-FM bats. J Comp Physiol 139:349–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuller G (1984) Natural ultrasonic echoes from wing beating insects are encoded by collicular neurons in the CF-FM bat,Rhinolophus ferrumequinum. J Comp Physiol A 155:121–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Southern HN (1964) Handbook of British mammals. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Taniguchi I (1985) Echolocation sounds and hearing of the Greater Japanese Horseshoe Bat (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum nippon) J Comp Physiol A 156:185–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Trappe M, Schnitzler HU (1982) Doppler-shift compensation in insect-catching horseshoe bats. Naturwissenschaften 69:193–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Vater M, Feng AS, Betz M (1985) An HRP-study on the frequency place map of the horseshoe bat cochlea: Morphological correlates of the sharp tuning to a narrow frequency band. J Comp Physiol A 157:671–686

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogler B, Neuweiler G (1983) Echolocation in the noctule (Nyctalus noctula) and horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum). J Comp Physiol 152:421–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenstrup JJ, Suthers RA (1984) Echolocation of moving targets by the fish-catching bat,Noctilio leporinus. J Comp Physiol A 155:75–89

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Link, A., Marimuthu, G. & Neuweiler, G. Movement as a specific stimulus for prey catching behaviour in rhinolophid and hipposiderid bats. J. Comp. Physiol. 159, 403–413 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00603985

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00603985

Keywords

Navigation