Summary
-
1.
The echolocating ‘long CF/FM-bat’Rhinolophus rouxi and the ‘short CF/FM-bats’Hipposideros bicolor andHipposideros speoris were tested for catching responses to moving and non-moving targets.
-
2.
Under our experimental conditions (freshly caught caged bats in a natural environment)Rhinolophus rouxi andHipposideros speoris only responded to insects of any sort that were beating their wings. The bats showed no reactions whatsoever to nonmoving insects or those walking on the floor or the sides of the cage.
-
3.
Hipposideros bicolor responded in the same way as the above species to wingbeating insects but in addition also attacked walking insects. In 27 presentations 15 walking insects were caught (Fig. 2).
-
4.
Rhinolophus rouxi, Hipposideros speoris andHipposideros bicolor also detected, approached and seized tethered cockroaches hanging from the ceiling when these were vibrating up and down (Fig. 3). This indicates that any oscillating movement and not specific aspects of wing beating were the key releasers for catching behaviour in all three species. However, a wing beating insect is strongly preferred over a vibrating one in all three species (Fig. 4).
-
5.
Rhinolophus rouxi, Hipposideros speoris andHipposideros bicolor attacked and seized a dead bait when it was associated with a wing beating device (Fig. 1). All three species responded effectively to beat frequencies as low as 10 beats/s (peak-to-peak amplitude of the wing excursion 20 mm). For lower frequencies the response rates rapidly deteriorated (Fig. 5).
-
6.
Horseshoe bats no longer responded to wing beats of 5 beats/s when the wing beat amplitude was 2 to 1 mm or to wing beats of 2 to 1 beats/s when the amplitude was 3 mm or lower (Fig. 6). This suggests that the speed of the wing is a critical parameter. From these data we infer that the threshold for the catching responses is at a wing speed of about 2 to 1 cm/s.
-
7.
In horseshoe bats (experimental tests) and the two hipposiderid species (behavioural observations) one single wing beat was enough to elicit a catching response (Fig. 8).
-
8.
It is concluded that ‘long’ and ‘short’ CF/ FM-bats feature a similar responsiveness to fluttering targets. The sensitivity to oscillating movements is considered as an effective detection mechanism for any sort of potential prey.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CF :
-
constant frequency
- FM :
-
frequency modulated
References
Bell GP (1982) Behavioral and ecological aspects of gleaning by a desert insectivorous bat,Antrozous pallidus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 10:217–223
Bell GP, Fenton MB (1984) The use of Doppler-shifted echoes as a flutter detection and clutter rejection system: the echolocation and feeding behavior ofHipposideros ruber (Chiroptera: Hipposideridae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 15:109–114
Fiedler J (1979) Prey catching with and without echolocation in the Indian False Vampire (Megaderma lyra). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 6:155–160
Goldman LJ, Henson OW (1977) Prey recognition and selection by the constant frequency bat,Pteronotus p. parnellii. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:411–419
Grinnell AD, Hagiwara S (1972) Adaptations of the auditory nervous system for echolocation. Z Vergl Physiol 76:41–81
Guppy A, Coles R (submitted) Acoustical and neural aspects of hearing in the Australian gleaning bats,Macroderma gigas (Microchiroptera: Megadermatidae) andNyctophilus gouldi (Microchiroptera: Verspertilionidae). J Comp Physiol A
Gustafson Y, Schnitzler HU (1979) Echolocation and obstacle avoidance in the hipposiderid batAsellia tridens. J Comp Physiol 131:161–167
Habersetzer J (1982) Untersuchungen zur Echoortung und zur Ökologie der Fledermäuse in Madurai. Diss Fachber Biol Univ Frankfurt
Habersetzer J, Schuller G, Neuweiler G (1984) Foraging behavior and Doppler shift compensation in echolocating hipposiderid bats,Hipposideros bicolor andHipposideros speoris. J Comp Physiol A 155:559–567
Jen PH-S, Suthers RA (1982) Responses of inferior collicular neurons to acoustic stimuli in certain FM and CF-FM paleotropical bats. J Comp Physiol 146:423–434
Neuweiler G (1970) Neurophysiologische Untersuchungen zum Echoortungssystem der Großen HufeisennaseRhinolophus ferrumequinum. Z Vergl Physiol 67:273–306
Neuweiler G (1983) Echolocation and adaptivity to ecological constraints. In: Huber F, Markl H (eds) Neuroethology and behavioral physiology: Roots and growing points. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 280–302
Neuweiler G, Bruns V, Schuller G (1980) Ears adapted for the detection of motion, or how echolocating bats have exploited the capacities of the mammalian auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 68:741–753
Neuweiler G, Metzner W, Heilmann U, Rübsamen R, Costa HH (submitted) Foraging behaviour and echolocation in the rufous horseshoe bat,Rhinolophus rouxi, of Sri Lanka. Behav Ecol Sociobiol
Neuweiler G, Singh S, Sripathi K (1984) Audiograms of a South Indian bat community. J Comp Physiol A 154:133–142
Ostwald J (1984) Tonotopical organization and pure tone response characteristics of single units in the auditory cortex of the Greater Horseshoe Bat. J Comp Physiol A 155:821–834
Pye JD (1980) Echolocation signals and echoes in air. In: Busnel RG, Fish JF (eds) Animal sonar systems. Plenum Press, New York London, pp 309–353
Schnitzler HU (1968) Die Ultraschall-Ortungslaute der Hufeisen-Fledermäuse (Chiroptera-Rhinolophidae) in verschiedenen Orientierungssituationen. Z Vergl Physiol 57:376–408
Schnitzler HU, Flieger E (1983) Detection of oscillating target movements by echolocation in the Greater Horseshoe bat. J Comp Physiol 153:385–391
Schnitzler HU, Menne D, Kober R, Heblich K (1983) The acoustical image of fluttering insects in echolocating bats. In: Huber F, Markl H (eds) Neuroethology and behavioral physiology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 235–250
Schuller G (1972) Echoortung beiRhinolophus ferrumequinum mit frequenzmodulierten Lauten. Evoked potentials im Colliculus inferior. J Comp Physiol 77:306–331
Schuller G (1980) Hearing characteristics of Doppler shift compensation of South Indian CF-FM bats. J Comp Physiol 139:349–356
Schuller G (1984) Natural ultrasonic echoes from wing beating insects are encoded by collicular neurons in the CF-FM bat,Rhinolophus ferrumequinum. J Comp Physiol A 155:121–128
Southern HN (1964) Handbook of British mammals. Blackwell, Oxford
Taniguchi I (1985) Echolocation sounds and hearing of the Greater Japanese Horseshoe Bat (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum nippon) J Comp Physiol A 156:185–188
Trappe M, Schnitzler HU (1982) Doppler-shift compensation in insect-catching horseshoe bats. Naturwissenschaften 69:193–194
Vater M, Feng AS, Betz M (1985) An HRP-study on the frequency place map of the horseshoe bat cochlea: Morphological correlates of the sharp tuning to a narrow frequency band. J Comp Physiol A 157:671–686
Vogler B, Neuweiler G (1983) Echolocation in the noctule (Nyctalus noctula) and horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum). J Comp Physiol 152:421–432
Wenstrup JJ, Suthers RA (1984) Echolocation of moving targets by the fish-catching bat,Noctilio leporinus. J Comp Physiol A 155:75–89
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Link, A., Marimuthu, G. & Neuweiler, G. Movement as a specific stimulus for prey catching behaviour in rhinolophid and hipposiderid bats. J. Comp. Physiol. 159, 403–413 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00603985
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00603985