Skip to main content
Log in

Attractiveness of the maleAcheta domestica calling song to females

II. The relative importance of syllable period, intensity, and chirp rate

  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

FemaleAcheta domestica did not discriminate between pairs of model calling songs (CSs) which differed only in syllable period (SP; Fig. 1). The females selected the louder CS (Fig. 2) or the CS with a faster chirp rate (CR; Fig. 3) when presented with pairs of otherwise identical CSs. A CS with an SP of 50 ms (modal for the male's CS) was preferred when it was 5 dB louder than one with a 60-ms SP while a CS with a 60-ms SP was only consistently chosen when it was 10 dB louder than a CS with a 50-ms SP (Fig. 4). A more intense CS was preferred by the females regardless of whether its CR was faster or slower than that of the CS produced at a lower intensity (Fig. 6). When CSs with SPs of 50 or 60 ms had several different CRs, the females that made a significant choice preferred a CS with a 50-ms SP regardless of whether it was produced at a faster or slower CR (Figs. 7, 8). No significant selection between CSs with 40- and 50-ms SPs resulted when they were produced at different intensities (Fig. 5) or CRs (Fig. 9). Females only significantly chose a CS with a 50-ms SP over those with 40 ms SPs when the 50-ms-SP CS was louder and produced at a different CR (Fig. 10). From these results, it was apparent that SP, intensity, and CR all influenced a female's choice of a CS, and thus the male producing it. However, our results indicate that SP was the most important feature influencing the female's choice and that intensity was more effective than CR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CR :

chirp rate

CS :

calling song

POD :

polar orientation diagram

SP :

syllable period

References

  • Atkins G, Atkins S, Schoun D, Stout JF (1987) Scototaxis and shape discrimination in the female cricketAcheta domesticus in an arena and on a compensatory treadmill. Physiol Entomol 12:125–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty JA (1985a) Trade-off phenomena in calling song recognition and phonotaxis in the cricket,Gryllus bimaculatus (Orthoptera, Gryllidae). J Comp Physiol A 156:787–801

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty JA (1985b) Phonotaxis in the cricket,Gryllus bimaculatus DeGeer: comparison of choice and no-choice paradigms. J Comp Physiol A 157:279–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Doolan JM, Pollack GS (1985) Phonotactic specificity of the cricketTeleogryllus oceanicus: intensity-dependent selectivity for temporal parameters of the stimulus. J Comp Physiol A 157:223–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphey RK, Zaretsky MD (1972) Orientation to calling song by female crickets,Scapsipedus marginatus (Gryllidae). J Exp Biol 56:335–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack GS, Hoy RR (1979) Temporal pattern as a cue for species-specific calling song recognition in crickets. Science 204:429–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Popov AV, Shuvalov VF (1977) Phonotactic behavior of crickets. J Comp Physiol 119:111–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Popov AV, Shuvalov VF, Svetlogorskaya ID, Markovich AM (1975) Acoustic behavior and auditory systems in insects. In: Schwartzkopff J (ed) Mechanoreception (Symposium). Abh Rhein-Westf Akad Wiss 53:281–306

  • Schildberger K (1984) Temporal selectivity of identified auditory neurons in the cricket brain. J Comp Physiol A 155:171–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz B (1985) Phonotaxis inGryllus campestris L. (Orthoptera, Gryllidae). III. Intensity dependence of the behavioural performance and relative importance of tympana and spiracles in directional hearing. J Comp Physiol A 156:165–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Stout JF, Gerard G, Hasso S (1976) Sexual responsiveness mediated by the corpora allata and its relationship to phonotaxis in the female cricket,Acheta domesticus L. J Comp Physiol 108:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Stout JF, DeHaan CH, McGhee RW (1983) Attractiveness of the maleAcheta domesticus calling song to females. I. Dependence on each of the calling song features. J Comp Physiol 153:509–521

    Google Scholar 

  • Stout JF, Atkins G, Weber T, Huber F (1987) The effect of visual input on calling song attractiveness for femaleAcheta domesticus L. Physiol Entomol 12:135–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorson J, Weber T, Huber F (1982) Auditory behavior of the cricket. II. Simplicity of calling-song recognition inGryllus, and anomalous phonotaxis at abnormal carrier frequencies. J Comp Physiol 146:361–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber T (1978) Vergleich der Lockgesänge von drei Grillenarten im Hinblick auf artspezifisches Erkennen in der Phonotaxis der Weibchen. Verh Dtsch Zool Ges 71:176

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber T, Thorson J, Huber F (1981) Auditory behavior of the cricket. I. Dynamics of compensated walking and discrimination paradigms on the Kramer treadmill. J Comp Physiol 141:215–232

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stout, J.F., McGhee, R. Attractiveness of the maleAcheta domestica calling song to females. J. Comp. Physiol. 164, 277–287 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00603958

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00603958

Keywords

Navigation