Skip to main content
Log in

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic comparison of a new controlled-release formulation of metoprolol with a traditional slow-release formulation

  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The plasma concentration-time profile and haemodynamic effects of metoprolol after the administration of metoprolol CR1 (a new multiple-unit controlled-release formulation) and metoprolol SR2 (a traditional slow-release formulation) once daily, were investigated in 12 healthy men. Data were collected over one 24-h dose interval at steady state after five days of treament.

The study was a randomized, three-way, crossover comparison of metoprolol CR, 100 mg, metoprolol SR, 100 mg, and placebo. The reduction in exercise heart rate in relation to placebo treatment was used as a measure of β1-blockade.

The metoprolol plasma concentration-time profile during treatment with metoprolol CR was smooth and uniform, showing a more controlled release profile than that obtained with metoprolol SR. This was demonstrated by the significantly longer time period during which the plasma concentration exceeded 75% of the maximum concentration (T75), for metoprolol CR compared with metoprolol SR (p<0.05).

The percentage peak-trough fluctuation in plasma metoprolol concentration was significantly smaller for metoprolol CR than for metoprolol SR (p<0.001).

These pharmacokinetic differences between metoprolol CR and metoprolol SR produced a different duration of clinically relevant β1-blockade, defined as a reduction in exercise heart rate of >10%. By this definition metoprolol CR was still effective in seven subjects and metoprolol SR in two subjects 24 h after dosing. The percentage peak-trough fluctuation in exercise heart rate over the dose interval was significantly smaller for metoprolol CR than for metoprolol SR (p<0.001), thus demonstrating a more even β1-blockade with metoprolol CR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Regårdh C-G, Dorg KO, Johansson R, Johnsson G, Palmer L (1974) Pharmacokinetic studies on the selective β1-receptor antagonist metoprolol in man. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 2: 347–364

    Google Scholar 

  2. Johnsson G, Regårdh C-G, Sölvell L (1975) Combined pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies in man of the adrenergic β1-receptor antagonist metoprolol. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh) 36: [Suppl 5]: 31–44

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lennard MS, Silas JH, Freestone S, Ramsay LE, Tucker GT, Woods HF (1982) Oxidation phenotype — A major determinant of metoprolol metabolism and response. N Engl J Med 307: 1558–1560

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ragnarsson G, Sandberg A, Jonsson UE, Sjögren J (1987) Development of a new controlled release metoprolol product. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 13: 1495–1509

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ervik M, Kylberg-Hanssen K, Johansson L (1986) Determination of metoprolol in plasma and urine using high-resolution gas-chromatography and electron-capture detection. J Chromatogr 381: 168–174

    Google Scholar 

  6. Skelly JP, Barr WH (1985) Biopharmaceutic considerations in designing and evaluating novel drug delivery systems. Clin Res Pract Drug Reg Affairs 3: 501–539

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oosterhuis, B., Jonkman, J.H.G. & Kerkhof, F.A. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic comparison of a new controlled-release formulation of metoprolol with a traditional slow-release formulation. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 33 (Suppl 1), S15–S18 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00578407

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00578407

Key words

Navigation