Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of tetranitromethane on the biological activities of botulinum neurotoxin types A, B and E

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Botulinum neurotoxin serotypes A, B and E were modified at pH 7.9 with tetranitromethane, a reagent highly specific for tyrosine residues. The type B and E neurotoxins were completely detoxified without significant damage to their serological activities. Under similar modification conditions, the type A neurotoxin was incompletely detoxified with some alteration in its serological reactivity. Modification of only tyrosine residues to nitrotyrosine was evident from amino acid analysis of the acid hydrolysates of the modified proteins. The completely detoxified type B and E neurotoxins, used as toxoid, elicited antibodies in rabbits. The antisera precipitated and neutralized the homologous neurotoxin. The two toxoids, type B and E, were prepared with >99% pure neurotoxins as tested by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis whereas the traditional toxoids produced with formaldehyde are very crude preparations of the neurotoxin (∼ 90% impure). Chemical modification using tetranitromethane is more specific than products that form during ∼ 7 days of reaction between a protein and formaldehyde. The toxoids produced with tetranitromethane may be considered second-generation toxoids, compared with the first-generation toxoids (crude preparation of neurotoxins detoxified with formaldehyde).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sugiyama H:Clostridium botulinum neurotoxin. Microbiol Rev 44:419–448, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sakaguchi G:Clostridium botulinum toxins. Pharmacol Ther 19:165–194, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  3. Simpson LL: The origin, structure, and pharmacological activity of botulinum toxin. Pharmacol Rev 33:155–188, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cardella MA: Botulinum toxoids. In: KH Lewis and K Cassel Jr (eds) Botulism, Proceedings of a Symposium, U.S. Public Health Service Publication #999-FP-1, Public Health Service, Cincinnati, Ohio, 1964, pp 113–130

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bowmer EJ: Preparation and assay of the international standards forClostridium botulinum types A, B, C, D and E antitoxins. Bull Wld Hlth Org 29:701–709, 1963

    Google Scholar 

  6. DasGupta BR, Rasmussen S: Effect of diethylpyrocarbonate on the biological activities of botulinum neurotoxin types A and E. Arch Biochem Biophys 232:172–178, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  7. Riordan JF, Vallee JF: Nitration with tetranitromethane. Meth Enzymol 25:515–521, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  8. DasGupta BR, Sathyamoorthy V: Purification and amino acid composition of type A botulinum neurotoxin. Toxicon 22:415–424, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  9. DasGupta BR, Woody M: Amino acid composition ofClostridium botulinum type B neurotoxin. Toxicon 22:312–315, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  10. DasGupta BR, Rasmussen S: Purification and amino acid composition of type E botulinum neurotoxin. Toxicon 21:535–545, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  11. DasGupta BR, Sugiyama H: A common subunit structure inClostridium botulinum type A, B and E toxins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 48:108–112, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sathyamoorthy V, DasGupta BR: Separation, purification, partial characterization and comparison of the heavy and light chains of botulinum neurotoxin type A, B and E. J Biol Chem 260:10461–10466, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  13. DasGupta BR: Microbial food toxicants:Clostridium botulinum toxins. In: M Rechcigl Jr (ed) CRC Handbook of Foodborne Diseases of Biological Origin, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1983, pp 25–55

    Google Scholar 

  14. DasGupta BR, Sugiyama H: Inhibition ofClostridium botulinum types A and B hemagglutinins by sugars. Can J Microbiol 23:1257–1260, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  15. Boroff DA, Fleck U: Statistical analysis of a rapid in vivo method for the titration of the toxin ofClostridium botulinum. J Bacteriol 92:1580–1581, 1966

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sugiyama H, DasGupta BR, Ohishi I: Disulfide-immunogenicity relationship of botulinum toxins. Proc Soc Exptl Biol Med 145:1306–1309, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kozaki S, Sakaguchi G: Antigenicities of fragments ofClostridium botulinum type B derivative toxin. Infect Immun 11:932–936, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  18. Moore S: The precision and sensitivity of amino acid analysis. In: J Meinhoffer (ed) Chemistry and Biology of Peptides. Ann Arbor Science Publishers Inc., Ann Arbor, MI, 1972, pp 629–653

    Google Scholar 

  19. DasGupta BR, Rasmussen S: Role of amino groups in the structure and biological activity of botulinum neurotoxin types A and E. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 101:1209–1215, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  20. Markland FS, Bacharach ADE, Weber BH, O'Grady TC, Saunders GC, Umemura N: Chemical modification of yeast 3-phosphoglycerate kinase. J Biol Chem 250:1301–1310, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cuatrecasas P, Fuchs S, Anfinsen CB: The tyrosyl residues at the active site of staphylococcal nuclease, modification by tetranitromethane. J Biol Chem 243:4748–4798, 1968

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gaillard FL, Racadot A, Aubert J-P, Dantrevaux M: Modification of human transcortin by tetranitromethane. Evidence for the implication of a tyrosine residue in cortisol binding. Biochimie 64:153–158, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  23. Williams J: The identification of protected tyrosine residues in iron-ovotransferrin. Biochem J 201:647–651, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kabat EA, Mayer MM: Experimental Immunochemistry. C. C. Thomas, Springfield, Ill., 2nd ed, 1961

    Google Scholar 

  25. Akama K, Ito A, Yamamoto A, Sadahiro S: Reversion of toxicity of tetanus toxoid. Jap J Med Sci Biol 24:181–182, 1971

    Google Scholar 

  26. Akama K, Kameyama S, Otani S, Sadahiro S, Murata R: Reversion of toxicity of diphtheria toxoid. Jap J Med Sci Biol 24:183–187, 1971

    Google Scholar 

  27. Knox JN, Brown WP, Spero L: The role of sulfhydryl groups in the activity of type A botulinum toxin. Biochim Biophys Acta 214:350–354, 1970

    Google Scholar 

  28. Beers WH, Reich E: Isolation and characterization ofClostridium botulinum type B toxin. J Biol Chem 244:4473–4479, 1969

    Google Scholar 

  29. Boroff DA, DasGupta BR: Study of the toxin ofClostridium botulinum. Effects of 2-hydroxy-5-nitrobenzyl bromide on the biological activity of botulinum toxin. Biochim Biophys Acta 117:289–296, 1966

    Google Scholar 

  30. Shibaeva IV, Kolesnikova VA, Ivanov K: Change in the biological properteis of botulinic neurotoxin type A after chemical modification of the tryptophan and tyrosine residues in its molecule. Biokhimiya 46:825–831, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  31. Singh BR, DasGupta BR: Molecular differences between type A botulinum neurotoxin and its toxoid. Toxicon (in press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Woody, M., DasGupta, B.R. Effect of tetranitromethane on the biological activities of botulinum neurotoxin types A, B and E. Mol Cell Biochem 85, 159–169 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00577111

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00577111

Key words

Navigation