Skip to main content
Log in

Range of motion after total condylar knee arthroplasty

  • Clinical and Experimental Forum
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In this study the function of the knee measured at a medium-follow-up of 5–6 years was correlated with influencing factors concerning the implant of total condylar knee prosthesis in 90 patients. The only variable affecting postoperative extension was the preoperative range of extension whereas postoperative flexion was influenced by the preoperative flexion, valgus deviation of the preoperative AP tibal-femoral angle, position of the patella, and thickness of the resection of the distal femur cut.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cloutier JM (1983) Results of total-knee-arthroplasty with a non-constrained prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 65:906–919

    Google Scholar 

  2. Coutts RD, Toth C, Kaita JH (1984) The role of continuous passive motion in the rehabiliation of the total-knee-patient. In: Hungerford DS, Crackow KA, Kenna RV (eds) Total-knee-arthroplasty. A comprehensive approach. William and Wilkins, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  3. Figgie HE III, Goldberg VM, Heipel KG, Moller HS III, Cordon NH (1986) The influence of tibial-patellafemoral location on function of the knee in patients with the posterior stabilized condylar-knee-prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 68:1035–1040

    Google Scholar 

  4. Insall JN, Lachiewicz PF, Burstin AH (1982) The posterior stabilized condylar-prosthesis: a modification of the total-condylar design. Two to four-year clinical experience. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 64:1317–1323

    Google Scholar 

  5. Insall JN, Tria AJ, Scott WN (1979) The total-condylar kneeprosthesis: the first 5 years. Clin Orthop 145:68–77

    Google Scholar 

  6. Insall JN, Roud R, Flawn LW, Sullivan DJ (1983) The total-condylar knee-prosthesis in gonarthrosis. Five to nine-year follow-up of the first one hundred consecutive replacements. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 65:619–628

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kettelkamp DW (1976) Gait characteristics of the knee: normal, abnormal and post-reconstruction. American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons: symposium on reconstructive surgery of the knee. Mosby, St Louis, pp 47–57

    Google Scholar 

  8. Laubenthal KN, Smidt GL, Kettelkamp DW (1972) A quantitative analysis of knee-motion during activities of daily living. Phys Ther 52:34–42

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lotke PA, Ecker ML (1977) Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total-knee-replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 59:77–79

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mullen JO (983) Range of motion following total-knee-arthroplasty in ankylosed joints. Clin Orthop 1979:200–203

  11. Ritter MA, Stringer EA (1979) Predictive range of motion after total-knee-replacement. Clin Orthop 143:115–119

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schurman DJ, Parker JN, Ornstein D (1985) Total-condylar knee-replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 67:1006–1014

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Menke, W., Schmitz, B. & Salm, S. Range of motion after total condylar knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 111, 280–281 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00571524

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00571524

Keywords

Navigation