Skip to main content

54 Constrained Condylar Total Knee Replacement

  • Chapter
The Unhappy Total Knee Replacement

Abstract

In constrained condylar total knee replacement (CCK TKR), motion of the knee is guided in the frontal, sagittal, and axial plane. It is achieved by a relatively large central peg of the liner, which engages with the metallic femoral box. Constrained condylar knee replacement is indicated in unstable knees, in which adequate soft tissue balancing cannot be achieved during surgery. Careful clinical examination or mediolateral stress X-ray using the TelosĀ® device prior to surgery may help to identify those patients who should be treated with a CCK.

Clinical outcome and survival rates have shown comparable results when compared to primary unconstrained TKR. The use of stems is frequently but not always necessary in CCK. In primary TKR, CCK can be performed without stems, providing intact bone stock on both the femoral and tibial site. However, in revision surgery due to the lack of bony support, stems are recommended. Here up to 40 % of fixation load is taken by the intramedullary stems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Anderson JA, Baldini A, MacDonald JH, Tomek I, Pellicci PM, Sculco TP. Constrained condylar knee without stem extensions for difficult primary total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2007;20:195ā€“8.

    PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  2. Babazadeh S, Stoney JD, Lim K, Choong PF. The relevance of ligament balancing in total knee arthroplasty: how important is it? A systematic review of the literature. Orthop Rev. 2009;1:e26.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  3. Babazadeh S, Dowsey MM, Swan JD, Stoney JD, Choong PF. Joint line position correlates with function after primary total knee replacement: a randomised controlled trial comparing conventional and computer-assisted surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:1223ā€“31.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  4. Bellemans J, Vandenneucker H, Vanlauwe J, Victor J. The influence of coronal plane deformity on mediolateral ligament status: an observational study in varus knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18:152ā€“6.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  5. Bremer D, Orth BC, Fitzek JG, Knutsen A. Briardā€™s sagittal sliding osteotomy of the lateral condyle in total knee arthroplasty of the severe valgus knee. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2012;24:95ā€“108.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  6. Cawley DT, Kelly N, Simpkin A, Shannon FJ, McGarry JP. Full and surface tibial cementation in total knee arthroplasty: a biomechanical investigation of stress distribution and remodeling in the tibia. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2012;27:390ā€“7.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  7. Chong DY, Hansen UN, van der Venne R, Verdonschot N, Amis AA. The influence of tibial component fixation techniques on resorption of supporting bone stock after total knee replacement. J Biomech. 2011;44:948ā€“54.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  8. Chonko DJ, Lombardi AV, Berend KR. Patella baja and total knee arthroplasty (TKA): etiology, diagnosis, and management. Surg Technol Int. 2004;12:231ā€“8.

    PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  9. Fuchs S, Tibesku CO, Genkinger M, Volmer M, Laass H, Rosenbaum D. Clinical and functional comparison of bicondylar sledge prostheses retaining all ligaments and constrained total knee replacement. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2004;19:263ā€“9.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  10. Girard J, Amzallag M, Pasquier G, Mulliez A, Brosset T, Gougeon F, Duhamel A, Migaud H. Total knee arthroplasty in valgus knees: predictive preoperative parameters influencing a constrained design selection. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009;95:260ā€“6.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  11. Hossain F, Patel S, Haddad FS. Midterm assessment of causes and results of revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:1221ā€“8.

    ArticleĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  12. Khakharia S, Scuderi GR. Restoration of the distal femur impacts patellar height in revision TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:205ā€“10.

    ArticleĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  13. Kƶnig C, Matziolis G, Sharenkov A, Taylor WR, Perka C, Duda GN, Heller MO. Collateral ligament length change patterns after joint line elevation may not explain midflexion instability following TKA. Med Eng Phys. 2011;33:1303ā€“8.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  14. Lachiewicz PF, Falatyn SP. Clinical and radiographic results of the Total Condylar III and Constrained Condylar total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11:916ā€“22.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  15. Lachiewicz PF, Soileau ES. Ten-year survival and clinical results of constrained components in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:803ā€“8.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  16. Lee GC, Lotke PA. Management of intraoperative medial collateral ligament injury during TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:64ā€“8.

    ArticleĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  17. Lee JK, Lee S, Kim D, Lee SM, Jang J, Seong SC, Lee MC. Revision total knee arthroplasty with varus-valgus constrained prosthesis versus posterior stabilized prosthesis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21:620ā€“8.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  18. Martin JW, Whiteside LA. The influence of joint line position on knee stability after condylar knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;259:146ā€“56.

    PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  19. Matsuda S, Kawahara S, Okazaki K, Tashiro Y, Iwamoto Y. Postoperative alignment and ROM affect patient satisfaction after TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:127ā€“33.

    ArticleĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  20. Meneghini RM, Ritter MA, Pierson JL, Meding JB, Berend ME, Faris PM. The effect of the Insall-Salvati ratio on outcome after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:116ā€“20.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  21. Nazarian DG, Mehta S, Booth RE. A comparison of stemmed and unstemmed components in revision knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:256ā€“62.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  22. Padua R, Ceccarelli E, BondƬ R, Campi A, Padua L. Range of motion correlates with patient perception of TKA outcome. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;460:174ā€“7.

    CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  23. Partington PF, Sawhney J, Rorabeck CH, Barrack RL, Moore J. Joint line restoration after revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;367:165ā€“71.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  24. Porteous AJ, Hassaballa MA, Newman JH. Does the joint line matter in revision total knee replacement? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:879ā€“84.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  25. Rawlinson JJ, Closkey RF, Davis N, Wright TM, Windsor R. Stemmed implants improve stability in augmented constrained condylar knees. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:2639ā€“43.

    ArticleĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  26. Shen C, Lichstein PM, Austin MS, Sharkey PF, Parvizi J. Revision knee arthroplasty for bone loss: choosing the right degree of constraint. J Arthroplasty. 2013. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2013.04.042.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  27. Strauch M, von Eisenhart Rothe R, Graichen H. A new navigation-based technique for lateral distalizing condylar osteotomy in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty with fixed valgus deformity. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21:2263ā€“70.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  28. Vasso M, Beaufils P, Schiavone Panni A. Constraint choice in revision knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2013;37:1279ā€“84.

    ArticleĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roland Becker MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Becker, R., Hirschmann, M.T. (2015). 54 Constrained Condylar Total Knee Replacement. In: Hirschmann, M., Becker, R. (eds) The Unhappy Total Knee Replacement. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08099-4_65

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08099-4_65

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08098-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08099-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics