Skip to main content
Log in

Fracture mechanism of plant fibres

  • Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper, which describes work from an extensive study of various plant species, is aimed at presenting the best common physical description of the mechanism of failure in tension of cellulose-based fibres. A correlation coefficient of r=0.69 was observed between the mean tensile strengths and Young's moduli of fibres extracted from leaves, stems, and other miscellaneous sources. This observation is attributed to increases in Young's modulus and tensile strength with decreasing microfibril angle and increasing cellulose content. A cylindrical cell model was applied to the mean tensile strengths of fibres preconditioned at 24 to 27° C and 60% relative humidity. A modification of the resulting expression was used to produce the best correlation coefficient of r=0.89 between predicted and measured mean tensile strengths. However, the importance of cellulose content for strength which is presently illustrated for various plant species is not reflected in terms of mean fracture strain, which was increased by increasing microfibril angle showing why high works of fracture can be obtained from different species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. Jeronimides, Leiden Botanical Series No. 3 (1976) p. 253.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. C. Mclaughlin and R. A. Tait, J. Mater. Sci. 14 (1979) 998.

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. J. Rebenfeld, J. Pot. Sci. C. 9 (1965) 91.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. H. Page, F. El-Hosseiny, K. Winkler and R. Bain, Canadian Pulp and Paper Association — Meetings of the Technical Section, August (1972) T198.

  5. L. R. G. Treloar, Physics Today, December (1977) 23.

  6. A. Frey-Wyssling, “The Plant Cell Wall” (Gebrüder Bornbraegar, Berlin, 1976) p. 217.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Grant, “A Laboratory Handbook of Pulp and Paper Manufacture”, 2nd Edn (Edward Arnold, London, 1961) p. 131.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. D. Preston, “The Molecular Architecture of Plant Cell Walls” (Chapman and Hall, London, 1952) pp. 40, 120.

    Google Scholar 

  9. L. Holliday, “Composite Materials”, (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1966) p. 486.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. E. Mark, “Cell Wall Mechanics of Tracheids” (Yale University Press, New Haven, 1967) p. 107.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. D. Preston, “The Physical Biology of Plant Cell Walls” (Chapman and Hall, London, 1974) p. 376.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. E. Mark, “Cell Wall Mechanics of Tracheids” (Yale University Press, New Haven, 1967) p. 144.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. S. Srinivasan, Quart. J. Indian Inst. Sci. 4 (2) (1941) 222.

    Google Scholar 

  14. L. R. G. Treloar, Polymer 1 (1960) 290.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. A. Jawson, P. P. Gillis and R. E. Mark, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 306 (1968) 389.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McLaughlin, E.C., Tait, R.A. Fracture mechanism of plant fibres. J Mater Sci 15, 89–95 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00552431

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00552431

Keywords

Navigation