Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mechanical characterisation of fibres for engineered wood products: a scanning force microscopy study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mechanical properties of individual wood fibres and the characterisation of the interaction between wood fibres and resins are of interest to the composite wood panel industry and others involved in the fabrication of engineered wood products. However, the size of such fibres, typically a few millimetres in length, makes characterisation of their mechanical properties difficult. Gripping fibres is problematic, not to mention the measurement of meaningful load displacement data. Using a novel three-point bend test technique, the Young’s moduli of single wood fibres were determined. Fibres were placed on a specially designed test rig, and a scanning probe microscope was used to apply a load and to measure the deflection at the centre of each fibre. A model of the fibre was produced in order to facilitate data analysis. The technique proved to be feasible, resulting in an average Young’s modulus value of 24.4 GPa for Pinus Sylvestris softwood fibres. This compares well with other values in the literature, but there is scope for improvement in the methodology to lead to more accurate measurements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thakur V, Thakur M, Singha A (2013) Biomass-based biocomposites. Smithers Rapra Technology Ltd, Shawbury

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jesson DA, Gobin VPT, Gallagher S, Smith PA, Watts JF (2009) Properties of natural fibres for composite materials. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Composite Materials. Edinburgh, UK

  3. Chard JM, Creech G, Jesson DA, Smith PA (2013) Green composites: sustainability and mechanical performance. Polym Rubbers Compos 42:421–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Virk A, Hall W, Summerscales J (2010) Physical characterization of jute technical fibers. J Nat Fibres 7(3):216–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hacke U, Sperry J, Pittermann J (2004) Analysis of circular bordered pit function II. Gymnosperm tracheids with torus-margo pit membranes. Am J Bot 91(3):386–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ansell M (2015) Wood microstructure—a cellular composite. In: Ansell M (ed) Wood composites engineering with wood—from nanocellulose to superstructures. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, pp 1–27

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dai D, Fan M (2014) Wood fibres as reinforcements in natural fibre composites: structure, properties, processing and applications. In: Shanks AHAR (ed) Natural fibre composites: materials, processes and properties. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Philadelphia, pp 3–41

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Shah D, Schubel PJ, Clifford M, Licence P (2013) Fatigue life evaluation of aligned plant fibre composites through S–N curves and constant-life diagrams. Compos Sci Technol 74:139–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mott L (1995) Micromechanical properties and fracture mechanics of single wood pulp fibers: a PhD thesis. University of Maine

  10. Gindl W, Gupta H (2002) Cell-wall hardness and Young’s modulus of melamine-modified spruce wood by nano-indentation. Compos Part A Appl Sci 33:1141–1145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Havimo M, Rikala J, Sirviö J, Sipi M (2009) Tracheid cross-sectional dimensions in Scots pine (Pinus Sylvestris)—distributions and comparison with norway spruce (Picea abies). Silva Fenn 43(4):681–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jayne BA (1959) Mechanical properties of wood fibers. TAPPI 42(6):461–467

    Google Scholar 

  13. Page D, E-Hosseiny F, Winkler K, Lancaster A (1977) Elastic modulus of single wood pulp fibers. TAPPI 60(4):114–117

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wimmer R, Lucas BN, Tsui TY, Oliver WC (1997) Longitudinal hardness and young’s of spruce tracheid secondary walls using nano-indentation technique. Wood Sci Technol 31:131–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tze W, Wang S, Rials TG, Pharr GM, Kelley SS (2007) Nano-indentation of wood cell walls: continuous stiffness and hardness measurements. Compos Part A Appl Sci 38(3):945–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Trtik P, Kaufmann J, Volz U (2012) On the use of peak-force tapping atomic force microscopy for quantification of the local elastic modulus in hardened cement paste. Cem Concr Res 42(1):215–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Adamcik J, Berquand A, Mezzenga R (2011) Single-step direct measurement of amyloid fibrils stiffness by peak force quantitative nanomechanical atomic force microscopy. Appl Phys Lett 98:193701–193703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Orso S, Wegst U, Arzt E (2006) The elastic modulus of spruce wood cell wall material measured by an in situ bending technique. J Mater Sci 41(16):5122–5126. doi:10.1007/s10853-006-0072-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kersavage PC (1973) A system for automatically recording the load-elongation characteristics of single wood fibers under controlled relative humidity conditions. United States Department of Agriculture: US Government Printing Office

  20. Mott L, Groom L, Shaler S (2002) Mechanical properties of individual southern pine fibers. Part II: comparison of earlywood and latewood fibers with respect to tree height and juvenility. Wood Fiber Sci 34(2):221–237

    Google Scholar 

  21. Flamia R, Zhdan PA, Castle JE, Tamburro AM (2008) Comment on the mechanical properties of the amyloid fibre, poly(ValGlyGlyLeuGly), obtained by a novel AFM methodology. J Mater Sci 43(1):395–397. doi:10.1007/s10853-007-2289-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Mr Steve Bower and colleagues in the Faculty Workshop for assistance in the manufacture of the jig used in the current work, and Mr Dave Jones and Miss Rebecca Tung from the University of Surrey’s MicroStructural Studies Unit for assistance with RLM and SEM.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. A. Jesson.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest associated with the current work.

Appendix: Beam bending model

Appendix: Beam bending model

The beam bending model for a beam under symmetric three-point bending with unconstrained ends, as shown in Fig. 10, was considered to be the most applicable model to be used in the study.

Figure 10
figure 10

Symmetric three-point bending

The bending moment, M, is \( \frac{ - Fx}{2} \). This can be substituted into elastic beam bending equation given in Eq. 2.

$$ EI \frac{{{\text{d}}^{2} y}}{{{\text{d}}x^{2} }} = M $$
(2)

where E = Young’s modulus of the beam material, M = bending moment, and I = second moment of area of the beam cross section.

The resulting equation can be integrated as shown to produce an equation for the deflection of the beam, y, in terms of the distance from the end, x, the distance between the pivots, L, the Young’s modulus, E, and the second moment of area of the beam cross section, I (Eq. 3).

$$ EI \frac{{{\text{d}}^{2} y}}{{{\text{d}}x^{2} }} = \frac{ - Fx}{2} $$
$$ EI \frac{{{\text{d}}y}}{{{\text{d}}x}} = \frac{{ - Fx^{2} }}{4} + c_{1} $$

At \( x = \frac{L}{2} \), \( \frac{{{\text{d}}y}}{{{\text{d}}x}} = 0 \). Therefore \( c_{1} = \frac{{FL^{2} }}{16} \).

$$ EI \frac{{{\text{d}}y}}{{{\text{d}}x}} = \frac{{ - Fx^{2} }}{4} + \frac{{FL^{2} }}{16} $$
$$ EIy = \frac{{ - Fx^{3} }}{12} + \frac{{FL^{2} x}}{16} + c_{2} $$

At x = 0, y = 0. Therefore c 2 = 0.

$$ EIy = \frac{{ - Fx^{3} }}{12} + \frac{{FL^{2} x}}{16} $$
$$ y = \frac{Fx}{EI}\left( {\frac{{L^{2} }}{16} - \frac{{x^{2} }}{12}} \right) $$
$$ y = \frac{Fx}{48EI}\left( {3L^{2} - 4x^{2} } \right) $$

The deflection at the centre of the beam, δ, is the value of y when \( x = \frac{L}{2} \):

$$ \delta = \frac{{FL^{3} }}{48EI} $$
(3)

where E = Young’s modulus of the beam material, L = distance between pivots, I = second moment of area of the beam cross section, F = applied force, and δ = total deflection of the beam.

The basic beam bending equation presented above assumes that the beam displays linear elastic behaviour during the application of the bending force and that the deflection is small (proportionally to the size of the specimen). Force–displacement graphs from the AFM display regions of significant adhesion forces. Wood fibre samples also appeared to show hysteresis and a degree of nonlinear and non-elastic behaviour. Therefore, the gradient of the best fit line from the linear region of each curve was measured instead of the ‘peak applied force’ and the ‘total deflection of the fibre’ under bending. This gradient, K, is the bending stiffness (Eq. 4). Factoring in this gradient leads a modified three-point bend equation specific to this study (Eq. 5).

$$ K = \frac{\Delta F}{\delta } $$
(4)

where K = bending stiffness, ΔF = change in applied force, and δ = deflection corresponding to ΔF.

$$ E = \frac{1}{48}\frac{{L^{3} }}{I}K $$
(5)

where E = Young’s modulus, L 1 = distance between pivots, I = second moment of area of the cross section, and K = bending stiffness.

For simplicity, it was assumed that the cross section of an uncoated wood fibre was in the shape of an annulus, as shown in Fig. 11. It was also assumed that the fibre cross section was constant along the length of the fibre. This allowed the following equation to be used to calculate the second moment of area (Eq. 6):

$$ I = \frac{\pi }{4}\left( {r_{1}^{4} - r_{2}^{4} } \right) $$
(6)

where I = second moment of area, r 1 = outer radius, and r 2 = inner radius.

Figure 11
figure 11

Illustration of an annulus

The equation was modified to be more specific to the study by writing r1 and r2, in terms of the average outer mid-section diameter, Avg D, and the wall thickness of a fibre (Eq. 7).

$$ I = \frac{\pi }{4}\left( {\left( {\frac{{{\text{Avg}} D}}{2}} \right)^{4} - \left( {\frac{{{\text{Avg}} D}}{2} - t} \right) ^{4} } \right) $$
(7)

where I = second moment of area of the fibre cross section, Avg D = average mid-section diameter of the fibre, and t = wall thickness of the fibre.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fernando, S., Mallinson, C.F., Phanopolous, C. et al. Mechanical characterisation of fibres for engineered wood products: a scanning force microscopy study. J Mater Sci 52, 5072–5082 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-0744-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-0744-4

Keywords

Navigation