Skip to main content
Log in

On the applicability of CNDO indices for the prediction of chemical reactivity

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Theoretica chimica acta Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A series of CNDO/2 molecular orbital properties were evaluated to determine their utility in parameterizing chemical reactivities. Some of these indices were used previously for only Π electron methods and were extended here to include the σ framework. Theoretical rationales were given for this extension to the semi-empirical all valence electron methods. Four systems, the aromatic hydrocarbons, the benzene derivatives, the substituted benzoic acids, and the substituted phenyl amines, were studied to test how well these indices can parameterize chemical reactivities. This study focused on reactions involving both σ and π electrons where the reactive site is not necessarily on the aromatic framework. For the nonplanar and heteropolar systems, these indices performed as well as the Hückel method did for the classical aromatics. These CNDO indices should perform effectively in multivariable regressions to parameterize the reactivities for more complicated problems such as those encountered in quantitative structure activity relationships of drugs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Notes

  1. For example, see Streitweiser, Jr., A.: Molecular orbital theory for organic chemist, Chap. 11. New York: Wiley, N.Y. 1961; or Murrell, J. N., Harget, A. J.: Semi-empirical self-consistent-field molecular orbital theory of molecules, Chap. 1. New York: Wiley, N.Y., 1972

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kang, S., Beveridge, D. L.: Theoret. Chim. Acta (Berl.) 22, 312 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kang, S., Cho, M.-H.: Int. J. Quant. Chem., Symp. No. 7, 319 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Streitweiser, Jr., A., Mowery, P. C., Jesaitis, R. G., Lewis, A.: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 92 6529 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brownlee, R. T. C., Taft, R. W.: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 90, 6537 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  6. McKelvey, J. M., Alexandratos, S., Streitweiser, Jr., A., Abboud, J.-L. M., Hehre, W. J.: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 98, 244 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wohl, A. J.: Drug design, Ariens, E. J. Ed., Chap. 4. New York; Academic Press, N.Y. 1971

    Google Scholar 

  8. Coulson, C. A., Longuet Higgins, H. C.: Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) 192A, 16 (1947), and references therein

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fukui, K., Yonezawa, T., Shingu, N.: J. Chem. Phys. 20, 722 (1952); Fukui, K., Yonezawa, T., Nagata, C., Shingu, H.: J. Chem. Phys. 22, 1433 (1954); Fukui, K., Yonezawa, T., Nagata, C.: Bull. Chem. Soc. Japan 27, 423 (1954)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Greenwood, H. H., McWeeny, R.: Advances in physical organic chemistry, V. Gold, Ed., Vol. 4, Chap. 3. New York: Academic Press, N.Y. 1966

    Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson, C. D.: The Hammett equation, London: The Cambridge University Press, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stock, C. M., Brown, H. C.: A quantitative treatment of directive effects in aromatic substitution, in Adv. Phys. Org. Chem., Vol. 1, V. Gold, Ed., P 35. London: Academic Press, 1963

    Google Scholar 

  13. Helvie, W. J., Radom, L., Pople, J. A.: J. Am. Chem. Soc., 94, 1496 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Swain, C. G., Lupton, E. C.: J. Am. Chem. Soc., 90, 4328 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brown, R.E., Simas, A.M. On the applicability of CNDO indices for the prediction of chemical reactivity. Theoret. Chim. Acta 62, 1–16 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00551049

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00551049

Key words

Navigation