Skip to main content
Log in

Controlled comparison of two doses of milnacipran (F 2207) and amitriptyline in major depressive inpatients

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A multicenter study compared the antidepressant efficacy and the tolerance of two doses of milnacipran (50 mg and 100 mg/day) and amitriptyline (150 mg/day) in three parallel groups of 45 major depressive inpatients defined by Research Diagnostic Criteria. After a wash-out period of 4–7 days on placebo with lorazepam and/or nitrazepam if necessary, patients were randomly assigned to a daily dose of milnacipran 50 mg, milnacipran 100 mg or amitriptyline 150 mg reached on the 5th day and then stable over a 4-week period, with weekly assessments by means of the Montgomery and Asberg depression scale, the Hamilton depression scale, the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) and the Target Emergent Signs and Symptoms. Results showed significant superiority of both milnacipran 100 mg/day and amitriptyline over milnacipran 50 mg/day at the end of the treatment period. However, amitriptyline induced a nonsignificant trend toward more rapid improvement after 2 weeks of treatment, mainly based on items related to insomnia, supporting more sedative properties of amitriptyline as compared to milnacipran. Anticholinergic side-effects were significantly lower with milnacipran than with amitriptyline, explaining why milnacipran 100 mg exhibited at the end of the treatment period, a nonsignificantly better efficacy index on the CGI. Moreover, in contrast to milnacipran, amitriptyline was responsible for a significant decrease in blood pressure and a significant weight gain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ansseau M, Ansoms C, Beckers G, Bogaert M, Botte L, De Buck R, Diricq S, Dumortier A, Jansegers E, Owieczka J, Stellamans G (1984) Double-blind clinical study comparing alprazolam and doxepin in primary unipolar depression. J Affective Disord 7:287–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Covi L, Lipman R, McNair DM, Czerlinski T (1979) Symptomatic volunteers in multicenter drug trials. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol 3:521–533

    Google Scholar 

  • Enelow AJ (1975) Amitriptyline in the management of depression: an overview. In: Amitriptyline in the management of depression. Merck Sharp and Dohme, West Point, PA, pp 139–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Feighner JP (1986) The new generation of antidepressants. In: Rush AJ, Altschuler KZ (eds) Depression: basic mechanisms, diagnosis, and treatment. Guildford Press, New York, pp 205–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Guy W (ed) (1976) ECDEU Assessment manual for psychopharmacology (revised). National Institute of Mental Health, Psychopharmacology Research Branch, Rockville, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton M (1960) A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 12:56–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenox RH, Shipley JE, Peyser JM, Williams JM, Weaver LA (1984) Double-blind comparison of alprazolam versus imipramine in the inpatient treatment of major depressive illness. Psychopharmacol Bull 20 (1):79–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery A, Asberg M (1979) A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry 134:382–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Moret C, Charveron M, Finberg JPM, Couzinier JP, Briley M (1985) Biochemical profile of midalcipran (F 2207), l-phenyl-1-diethyl-aminocarbonyl-2-aminomethyl-cyclopropane (Z) hydrochloride, a potential fourth generation antidepressant drug. Neuropharmacology 24:1211–1219

    Google Scholar 

  • Raskin A, Schulterbrandt J, Reatig N, Rice CE (1967) Factors of psychopathology in interview, word behavior and self-report ratings of hospitalized depressions. J Consult Psychol 31:270–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Rush AJ, Erman MK, Schlesser MA, Roffwarg HP (1985) Alprazolam vs amitriptyline in depression with reduced REM latencies. Arch Gen Psychiatry 42:1154–1159

    Google Scholar 

  • Serre C, Clerc G, Escande M, Feline A, Ginestet D, Tignol J, Van Amerongen P (1986) An early clinical trial of midalcipran, a potential fourth generation antidepressant. Curr Ther Res 39:156–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer RL, Endicott J, Robins E (1978) Research Diagnostic Criteria: rationale and reliability. Arch Gen Psychiatry 34:773–778

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenger A, Couziner JP, Briley M (1987) Psychopharmacology of midalcipran, l-phenyl-1-diethyl-amino-carbonyl-2-aminomethylcyclopropane hydrochloride (F 2207), a new potential antidepressant. Psychopharmacology 91:147–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Praag HM (1984) Studies in the mechanism of action of serotonin precursors in depression. Psychopharmacol Bull 20:599–602

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner MD, Peabody CA, Whiteford HA, Hollister LE (1988) Alprazolam as an antidepressant. J Clin Psychiatry 49:148–150

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ansseau, M., von Frenckell, R., Mertens, C. et al. Controlled comparison of two doses of milnacipran (F 2207) and amitriptyline in major depressive inpatients. Psychopharmacology 98, 163–168 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00444686

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00444686

Key words

Navigation