Skip to main content
Log in

Efficient filtering of irrelevant global and local information when target level and location are random

  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Using compound letter stimuli (Navon, 1977), Paquet and Merikle (1988) found that subjects are very good at ignoring distractor letters shown in an irrelevant location when the distractors are also shown at the level of the structure opposite to that of the target. However, the procedure used by Paquet and Merikle (1988) might have biassed the results toward showing relatively poor non-target processing in this instance. The target level of structure was a blocked variable, and so subjects could ignore the other level of structure completely. In the present experiment, the target level was either blocked, requiring focussed attention to one level of structure, or else it varied randomly from trial to trial. This latter condition should require attention to be allocated to both levels of structure. Results were the same in both cases, namely efficient filtering of nontarget information when it was not at the target level of structure. The results are related to proposals (Duncan, 1981; Van der Heijden, 1981) that semantic analysis of visual information is an unlimited-capacity process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Briand, K. A. (submitted). Selective attention to global and local structure of objects: The role of cuing dimension.

  • Duncan, J. (1981). Directing attention in the visual field. Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 90–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, W. A., & Heinz, S. P. (1978). Flexibility and capacity demands of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 107, 420–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, W. A., & Heinz, S. P. (1979). Depth of nontarget processing in an attention task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 168–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Henik, A. (1981). Perceptual organization and attention. In M. Kubovy & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.), Perceptual organization (pp. 191–211). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navon, D. (1977). Forests before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paquet, L. (1988). L'Attention selective: L'Effet du critère de sélection. L'Année Psychologique, 88, 179–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Paquet, L., & Merikle, P. M. (1988). Global precedence in attended and nonattended objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 89–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1981). Short-term visual information forgetting. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Heijden, A. H. C., Hagenaar, R., & Bloem, W. (1984). Two stages in postcategorical filtering and selection. Memory & Cognition, 12, 458–469.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Briand, K.A. Efficient filtering of irrelevant global and local information when target level and location are random. Psychol. Res 55, 264–269 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00419686

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00419686

Keywords

Navigation