Abstract
The Roelofs effect is a visual direction illusion: if a large rectangular frame is seen offset from the straight-ahead direction, a small target presented simultaneously is mislocalized in the opposite direction. To investigate whether a similar context illusion might affect auditory localization, we presented a “frame” of 6 speakers driven with a 300-Hz square wave, 30° left or right of center. The “target” was a speaker driven with the same waveform, with the two sources in random phase relationship. The target was mislocalized in a direction opposite the frame, an auditory Roelofs effect. A second experiment, using dissimilar sounds for frame and target, yielded no frame-dependent mislocalizations. The effect appeared both in verbal position estimation, a measure of cognitive localization, and in open-loop pointing, a measure of localization in a sensorimotor system. We conclude that audition possesses only one representation of space, in contrast to the two (cognitive and sensorimotor) of vision. The auditory representation corresponds most closely to vision's cognitive system.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blauert, J. (1982). Binaural localization. Scandinavian Audiology Suppl. 15, 7–26.
Bridgeman, B. (1991). Complementary cognitive and motor image processing. In G. Obrecht & L. Stark (Eds.), Presbyopia Research. New York: Plenum Press.
Bridgeman, B. (1992). Conscious vs. unconscious processes: The case of vision. Theory & Psychology, 2, 73–88.
Bridgeman, B., Kirch, M., & Sperling, A. (1981). Segregation of cognitive and motor aspects of visual function using induced motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 29, 336–342.
Bridgeman, B., Lewis, S., Heit, G., & Nagle, M. (1979). Relation between cognitive and motor-oriented systems of visual position perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 5, 692–700.
Cameron, E. L., Baker, C. L., Jr., & Boulton, J. C. (1992). Spatial frequency selective mechanisms underlying the motion aftereffect. Vision Research, 32, 561–568.
Geldard, F. A. (1972). The human senses (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Grantham, D. W. (1989). Motion aftereffects with horizontally moving sound sources in the free field. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 129–136.
Grantham, D. W., & Wightman, F. L. (1979). Auditory motion aftereffects. Perception, & Psychophysics, 26, 403–408.
Guski, R. (1990). Auditory localization: Effects of reflecting surfaces. Perception, 19, 819–830.
Harrison, J. M., & Howe, M. E. (1974). Anatomy of the afferent auditory nervous system of mammals. In W. Keidel & W. D. Neff (Eds.), Handbook of sensory physiology: Vol. 1. Auditory system (pp. 283–336). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
Lakatos, S. (1993). Temporal constraints on apparent motion in auditory space. Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 139–144.
Mateeff, S., Hohnsbein, J., & Noack, T. (1985). Dynamic visual capture: Apparent auditory motion induced by a moving visual target. Perception, 14, 721–727.
Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1993). Visual pathways to perception and action, Progress in Brain Research, 95, 317–37.
Mishkin, M., Ungerleider, L., & Macko, K. (1983). Object vision and spatial vision: Two cortical pathways. Trends in Neurosciences, 6, 414–417.
Paillard, J. (1987). Cognitive versus sensorimotor encoding of spatial information. In P. Ellen & C. Thinus-Blanc. (Eds.), Cognitive processes and spatial orientation in animal and man (pp. 43–77). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Roelofs, C. (1935). Optische localisation. Archiv für Augenheilkunde, 109, 395–415.
Rosetti, Y., & Regnier, C. (1995). Representations in action: Pointing to a target with various representations. In B. Bardy, R. Bootsma, & Y. Guiard (Eds.), Studies in perception and action (Vol. 3, pp. 233–236). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Strybel, T. Z., Manligas, C. L., Chan, O., & Perrott, D. R. (1990). A comparison of the effects of spatial separation on apparent motion in the auditory and visual modalities. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 439–448.
Strybel, T. Z., Manligas, C. L., & Perrott, D. R. (1989). Auditory apparent motion under binaural and monaural listening conditions. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 371–377.
Terhune, J. M. (1985). Localization of pure tones and click trains by untrained humans. Scandinavian Audiology, 14, 125–131.
Thurlow, W. R., & Jack, C. (1973). Some determinants of localization of adaptation effects for successive auditory stimulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 53, 1573–1577.
Warren, R. M., & Bashford, J. A. (1976). Auditory contralateral induction: An early stage in binaural processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 20, 380–386.
Wong, E., & Mack, A. (1981). Saccadic programming and perceived location. Acta Psychologica, 48, 123–131.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bridgeman, B., Aiken, W., Allen, J. et al. Influence of acoustic context on sound localization: An auditory Roelofs effect. Psychol. Res 60, 238–243 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00419408
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00419408