Skip to main content
Log in

Leaf and canopy responses of Lolium perenne to long-term elevated atmospheric carbon-dioxide concentration

  • Published:
Planta Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relationship between leaf photosynthetic capacity (p n, max), net canopy CO2- and H2O-exchange rate (NCER and E t, respectively) and canopy dry-matter production was examined in Lollium perenne L. cv. Vigor in ambient (363±30 μl· l-1) and elevated (631±43 μl·l-1) CO2 concentrations. An open system for continuous and simultaneous regulation of atmospheric CO2 concentration and NCER and E t measurement was designed and used over an entire growth cycle to calculate a carbon and a water balance. While NCERmax of full-grown canopies was 49% higher at elevated CO2 level, stimulation of p n, max was only 46% (in spite of a 50% rise in one-sided stomatal resistance for water-vapour diffusion), clearly indicating the effect of a higher leaf-area index under high CO2 (approx. 10% in one growing period examined). A larger amount of CO2-deficient leaves resulted in higher canopy dark-respiration rates and higher canopy light compensation points. The structural component of the high-CO2 effect was therefore a disadvantage at low irradiance, but a far greater benefit at high irradiance. Higher canopy darkrespiration rates under elevated CO2 level and low irradiance during the growing period are the primary causes for the increase in dry-matter production (19%) being much lower than expected merely based on the NCERmax difference. While total water use was the same under high and low CO2 levels, water-use efficiency increased 25% on the canopy level and 87% on a leaf basis. In the course of canopy development, allocation towards the root system became greater, while stimulation of shoot dry-matter accumulation was inversely affected. Over an entire growing season the root/shoot production ratio was 22% higher under high CO2 concentration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

C350:

ambient CO2, 363±30 μl·l-1

C600:

high CO2, 631±43 μl·l-1

c a :

atmospheric CO2 level

c i :

CO2 concentration in the intracellular spaces of the leaf

Et :

canopy evapotranspiration

I o :

canopy light compensation point

NCER:

canopy CO2-exchange rate

p n :

leaf photosynthetic rate

PPFD:

photosynthetic photon flux density

r a :

leaf boundary-layer resistance

RD:

canopy dark-respiration rate

r s :

stomatal resistance

WUE:

water use efficiency

References

  • Boote, K.J., Jones, J.W. (1986) Equations to define canopy photosynthesis from quantum efficiency, maximum leaf rate, light extinction, leaf area index and photon flux density. Proc. 7th Congr. on Photosynthesis, Providence, Rhode Island), Biggins, J., ed. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K., Higginbotham, K.O. (1986) Effect of carbon dioxide enrichment and nitrogen supply on growth of boreal tree seedlings. Tree Physiol. 2, 223–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceulemans, R., Kockelbergh, F., Impens, I. (1986) A fast, low cost and low power requiring device for improving closed loop CO2 measuring systems. J. Exp. Bot. 37, 1234–1244

    Google Scholar 

  • De Wit, C.T. (1978) Stimulation of assimilation, respiration and transpiration of crops. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake, B.G., Read, M. (1981) Carbon dioxide asimilation, photosynthetic efficiency and respiration of Chesapeake Bay salt march. J. Ecol. 69, 405–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake, B.G., Rogers, H.H., Allen, L.H. (1985) Methods of exposing plants to elevated carbon dioxide. In: Direct effects of increasing carbon dioxide on vegetation (Rep. DOE/ ER-239, Dept. of Energy, Washington D.C.), pp. 11–35, Strain, B.R., Cure, J.D., eds. NTIS, Springfield, Va., USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Farquhar, D.G., Sharkey, T.D. (1982) Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 33, 317–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, D.M. (1980) Biophysical ecology. Springer, New York Heidelberg Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Grantz, D.A., Moore, P.H., Zeiger, E. (1987) Stomatal responses to light and humidity in sugarcane: prediction of daily time courses and identification of potential selection criteria. Plant Cell Environ. 10, 197–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Louwerse, W. (1980) Effects of CO2 concentration and irradiance on the stomatal behaviour of maize, barley and sunflower plants in the field. Plant Cell Environ. 3, 391–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijs, I., Impens, I., Behaeghe, T.J. (1988) Effects of rising atmospheric carbon dioxide on gas exchange and growth of perennial ryegrass. Photosynthetica 22, 44–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Nobel, P.S. (1983) Biophysical plant physiology and ecology. Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Norby, R.J., Pastor, K., Melillo, J.M. (1986) Carbon-nitrogen interactions in CO2-enriched white oak: physiological and long-term perspectives. Tree Physiol. 2, 243–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Sestak, Z., Catsky, J., Jarvis, P.G. (1971) Plant photosynthetic production: manual of methods. Junk, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nijs, I., Impens, I. & Behaeghe, T. Leaf and canopy responses of Lolium perenne to long-term elevated atmospheric carbon-dioxide concentration. Planta 177, 312–320 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00403588

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00403588

Key words

Navigation