Skip to main content
Log in

The transport of oyster larvae in an estuary

  • Published:
Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vertical and horizontal distributions of 3 larval stages of the oyster Crassostrea virginica were measured concurrently with phytoplankton species compositions, phytoplankton size distributions and physical hydrographic parameters in tributaries of the Chesapeake Bay (USA) during the oyster spawning seasons of 1980 and 1981. The superposition of the biological distributions upon the physical hydrographic data provide instantaneous distributions of the entire system which are consistent with the upstream transport of oyster larvae. Oyster larvae distributions in the Choptank River and its Broad Creek and Tred Avon River tributaries can be described in terms of three contiguous regions: (1) a common spawning region, (2) an intermediate, upstream transport region and (3) a seed bed region where major spat set occurs. The phytoplankton species compositions and abundances in the size fraction less than 10 μm in the tributary system during the transport were sufficient to supply optimum growth requirements of developing larvae. The transport proposed can explain the 30 yr record of consistently higher spat set success in one tributary, Broad Creek, relative to an adjoining tributary, the Tred Avon River. This may be a general mechanism whereby oysters maintain reproductive success and emigrate to seed bed regions in the Chesapeake Bay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Carriker, M. R.: Ecological observations on the distribution of oyster larvae in New Jersey estuaries. Ecol. Monogr. 21, 19–38 (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chanley, P. and J. D. Andrews: Aids for identification of bivalve larvae of Virginia. Malacologia 11, 45–119 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesapeake Bay Institute: St. Mary's River Cruise, 19 June–18 July 1952. Data Rep. Chesapeake Bay Inst. 11 (1952)

  • Cronin, W. B. and R. C. Seitz: Some slack temperature and salinity distributions in vertical sections along the longitudinal axis and across the entrance of Chesapeake Bay, April 1969–July 1974. Chesapeake Bay Institute 1975. (Graphical Summary No. 7)

  • Davis, H. C. and R. R. Guillard. Relative value of ten genera of micro-organisms as foods for oyster and clam larvae. Fishery Bull. Fish Wildl. Serv. U.S. 58, 293–304 (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  • Galstoff, P. S.: The American oyster Crassostrea virginica Gmelin. Fishery. Bull. Fish Wildl. Serv. U.S. 64, 1–480 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  • Loosanoff, V. L. and C. A. Nomejko: Spawning and setting of the American oyster, O. virginica, in relation to lunar phases. Ecology 32, 113–134 (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, J. H. and H. H. Whaley: Distribution of oyster larvae and spat in relation to some environmental factors in a tidal estuary. Proc. natn. Shellfish. Ass. 45, 56–65 (1954)

    Google Scholar 

  • Meritt, D. W.: Oyster spat set on natural culch in the Maryland portion of the Chesapeake Bay (1939–1975). Spec. Rep. Univ. Med Cent. envir. estuar. Stud. 7, 1–30 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J.: Report of the biologist. Rep. New Jers. St. agric. exp. Stn June, 1910 183–218 (1911)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, D. W.: The physical hydrography of estuaries and some applications to biological problems. Trans. N. Am. Wildl. Conf. 16, 368–376 (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, D. W.: Distribution of oyster larvae in relation to hydrographic conditions. Proc. Gulf Caribb. Fish. Inst. Nov. 1952 1–10 (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, H. M.: Occurrence and retention of plankton within the estuary. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 5, 164–171 (1940)

    Google Scholar 

  • Seliger, H. H. and M. E. Loftus: Growth and dissipation of phytoplankton in Chesapeake Bay. II. A statistical analysis of phytoplankton standing crops in the Rhode and West Rivers and an adjacent section of the Chesapeake Bay. Chesapeake Sci. 15, 185–204 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Seliger, H. H., M. E. Loftus and D. V. Subbarao: Dinoflagellate accumulations in Chesapeake Bay. Proc. 1st int. Conf. tox. Dinoflagellate Blooms, 181–205 (1975). (Ed. by V. R. LoCicero. Wakefield, Mass.: Massachusetts Science and Technology Foundation)

    Google Scholar 

  • Seliger, H. H., K. R. McKinley, W. H. Biggley, R. B. Rivkin and K. R. H. Aspden: Phytoplankton patchiness and frontal regions. Mar. Biol. 61, 119–131 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  • Taft, J. L., W. R. Taylor, E. O. Hartwig and R. Loftus: Seasonal oxygen depletion in Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries (Solomons, Md), 3, 242–247 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, M. A. and H. H. Seliger: Annual subsurface transport of a red tide dinoflagellate to its bloom area. Water circulation patterns and organism distributions in the Chesapeake Bay. Limnol. Oceanogr. 23, 227–246 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, M. A. and H. H. Seliger: Selection for a red tide organism. Physiological responses to the physical environment. Limnol. Oceanogr. 26, 310–324 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, D. H.: Sexual development of croaker, Micropogon undulatus, and distribution of the early stages in Chesapeake Bay. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 70, 475–482 (1940)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, L. and W. J. Hargis: Transport of bivalve larve in a tidal estuary. Proc. 4th Eur. mar. Biol. Symp. 29–44 (1971). (Ed. by D. J. Crisp. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by N.D. Holland, La Jolla

Contribution No. 1144 of the McCollum-Pratt Institute and Department of Biology

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seliger, H.H., Boggs, J.A., Rivkin, R.B. et al. The transport of oyster larvae in an estuary. Mar. Biol. 71, 57–72 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00396993

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00396993

Keywords

Navigation