Skip to main content
Log in

Methodology for designing air quality monitoring networks: I. Theoretical aspects

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An objective methodology is presented for determining the number and disposition of ambient air quality stations in a monitoring network for the primary purpose of compliance with air quality standards. The methodolgy utilizes a data base with real or simulated data from an air quality dispersion model for application with a two-step process for ascertaining the optimal monitoring network. In the first step, the air quality patterns in the data base are collapsed into a single composite pattern through a figure-of-merit (FOM) concept. The most desirable locations are ranked and identified using the resultant FOM fields. In the second step the network configuration is determined on the basis of the concept of spheres of influence (SOI) developed from cutoff values of spatial correlation coefficients between potential monitoring sites and adjacent locations. The minimum number of required stations is then determined by deletion of lower-ranked stations whose SOIs overlap. The criteria can be set to provide coverage of less than some fixed, user-provided percentage of the coverage of tha SOIs of the higher ranked stations and for some desired level of minimum detection capability of concentration fluctuations.

The methodology is applied in a companion paper (McElroy et al., 1986) to the Las Vegas, Nevada, metropolitan area for the pollutant carbon monoxide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Buell, C.: 1975, ‘Objective Procedures for Optimum Location of Air Pollutant Observation Stations’, EPA-650/4-75-005, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, F. N. 1938, Tables of the Ordinates and Probability Integral of the Distribution of the Correlation Coefficient in Small Samples, The Biometrika Office, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ezekiel, M.: 1941, Methods of Correlation Analysis, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gether, J. and Seip, H.: 1979, ‘Analysis of Air Pollution Data by the Combined Use of Interactive Graphic Presentation and a Clustering Technique’, Atmos. Environment 13, 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, S. and Kortanek, K.: 1973, ‘Determining Sampling Equipment Locations by Optimal Experimental Design with Application to Environmental Protection and Acoustics’, Math. in the Social Scienes, Paper 90–725.

  • Gustafson, S. and Kortanek, K.: 1976, ‘Numerical Optimization Techniques in Air Quality Modeling; Objective Interpolation Formulae for the Spatial Distribution of Pollutant Concentration’, EPA-600/4-76-058. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hougland, E.: 1979, ‘Air Quality Monitor Network Design by Analytical Techniques III: A Case Study’, Paper presented at the American Society for Quality Control Specialty Meeting on Quality Assurance in Air Pollution Measurement. New Orleans, Louisiana.

  • Koda, K. and Seinfeld, J.: 1978, ‘Air Monitoring Siting by Objective’, EPA-600/4-78-036, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, Nevada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. D., Graves, R. J., and McGinnis, L. F.: 1978, ‘A Procedure for Air Monitoring Instrumentation Location’, Management Science 24, 1451–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, M. K. and Moore, G. E.: 1980, ‘Development and Application of a Methodology for Air Quality Monitoring Network Design’, Proc. of Second Joint Conference on Applications of Air Pollution Meteorology and the Second Conference on Industrial Meteorology (New Orleans, Louisiana) pp. 727–733.

  • Liu, M. K., Meyer, J., Pollack, R., Roth, P. M., Seinfeld, J. H., Behar, J. V., Dunn, L. M., McElroy, J. L., Lem, P. N., Pitchford, A. M. and Fisher, N. T.: 1977, ‘Development of a Methodology for the Design of a Carbon Monoxide monitoring Network’, EPA-600/4-77-019, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, Nevada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, F. L. and Kealoha, J. H. S.: 1975, ‘Selecting Sites for Carbon Monoxide Monitoring’, EPA 450/3-75-077. U:S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, F. L., Berg, N. J., and Hoffman, A. J.: 1976, ‘The Selection of Sites for Air Pollutant Monitoring’, Paper presented at the 69th Annual Meeting of the Air Pollut. Control Assoc., Portland, Oregon.

  • McElroy, J. L., Behar, J. V., Dunn, L. M., Lem, P. N., Pitchford, A. M., Fisher, N. T., Liu, M. K., Jersky, T. N., Meyer, J. P., Ames, J., and Lundberg, G.: 1978, ‘Carbon Monoxide Monitoring Network Design Methodology’, EPA-600/4-78-053, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, Nevada.

    Google Scholar 

  • McElroy, J. L., Liu, M. K., Behar, J. V., and Meyers, T. C. 1986, ‘Methodogy for Designing Air Quality Monitoring Networks: II—Application to Las Vegas, Nevada for Carbon Monoxide’, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 6, 13–34 (this issue).

    Google Scholar 

  • Munn, R.: 1981, ‘The Estimation and Interpretation of Air Quality Trends Including Some Implications for Network Design’, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 1, 49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamori, Y., Ikeda, S., and Sawaragi, Y.: 1979, ‘Design of Air Pollutant Monitoring System by Spatial Sample Stratification’, Atmos. Environment. 13, 97–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noll, K. E., Miller, T. E., Norco, J. E.,and Raufer, R. K.: 1977, ‘An Objective Air Monitoring Site Selection Methodology for Large Point Sources’, Atmos. Environment 11, 1051–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott, W. R.: 1975, ‘Development of Criteria for Siting Monitoring Stations’, Paper presented at 68th Annual Meeting of the Air Pollut. Control Assoc., Boston, Massachusetts.

  • Ott, W. R. and Thom, G. C.: 1976, ‘A Critical Review of Air Pollution Index Systems in the United States and Canada’, J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 26, 460–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richitt, P., Webb, V., Schronbrod, R., and Behar, J.: 1982, ‘Evaluation of a Multimedia Monitoring System in Southeast Ohio’, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2, 171–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiermeier, F. A.: 1978, ‘Air Monitoring Milestones: RAPS' Field Measurements Are In’, Env. Sci. Technol. 6, 644–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. and Egan, B.: 1979, ‘Design of Monitoring Networks to Meet Multiple Criteria’, Unpublished Report prepared by ERT, Inc., 3 Militia Drive, Lexington, Massachusetts.

  • Vukovich, F. M., Bach, W. D., and Clayton, C. A.: 1978, ‘Optimum Meteorological and Air Pollution Sampling Network Selection in Cities, Volume I: Theory and Design for St. Louis’, EPA-600/4-78-030, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, Nevada.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Although the research described in this article has been funded wholly or in part by the United States Environmental Protection Agency through Contract No. 68-03-2446 to Systems Applications, Inc., it has not been subjected to Agency review and therefore does not necessarily reflect the views of the Agency and no official endorsement should be inferred.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, M.K., Avrin, J., Pollack, R.I. et al. Methodology for designing air quality monitoring networks: I. Theoretical aspects. Environ Monit Assess 6, 1–11 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00394284

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00394284

Keywords

Navigation