Skip to main content

Is Moral Growth Possible for Managers?

A Pragmatist Look at Managerial Ethics

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Philosophy of Management

Part of the book series: Handbooks in Philosophy ((HP))

Abstract

Every managerial choice is an opportunity to either grow or decline morally. Pragmatism, at least the Deweyan version presented here, maintains that there are no objective moral facts or values. Instead, our current moral outlook is the result of our past experiences and social interactions, and prone to evolve in the future. The function of morality in human lives is to make living together possible, but the morality that we inherit from our social surroundings is almost inescapably plagued by blind spots, biases, and narrowness. Like any other human being, the manager cannot choose their social background or inherited biases. What one can choose is to commit oneself to moral growth and a conscious attempt to expand one’s moral outlook. Some of the key habits in this path are remaining open to other perspectives, consciously seeking opposing and novel voices, interpreting them charitably, and engaging in moral imagination. The resulting progress is not “objective” growth but moral growth – in the sense that, through such cultivation, one’s moral outlook can better serve the basic function that such a system has in human lives and in one’s role as a manager. Given that morality is not something fixed but a continuous process, the key moral responsibility of a manager is to commit oneself to moral growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aldag RJ, Fuller SR (1993) Beyond fiasco: a reappraisal of the groupthink phenomenon and a new model of group decision processes. Psychol Bull 113:533–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baert P (2003) Pragmatism, realism and hermeneutics. Found Sci 8:89–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barclay P, van Vugt M (2015) The evolutionary psychology of human prosociality: adaptations, byproducts, and mistakes. In: Schroeder DA, Graziano WG (eds) The Oxford handbook of prosocial behavior. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 37–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Bear S, Rahman N, Post C (2010) The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. J Bus Ethics 97(2):207–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0505-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chudek M, Henrich J (2011) Culture–gene coevolution, norm-psychology and the emergence of human prosociality. Trends Cogn Sci 15:218–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark A (2016) Surfing uncertainty: prediction, action, and the embodied mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dennett DC (2013) Intuition pumps and other tools for thinking. W. W. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey J (1891) Moral theory and practice. Int J Ethics 1:186–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey J (1922) Human nature and conduct. Henry Holt and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey J (1930) Three independent factors in morals. In: Hickman LA, Alexander TM (eds) The essential Dewey, Volume 2: Ethics, logic, psychology. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp 315–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey J (1932) Ethics – revised edition. Henry Holt and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey J (1938) Logic – the theory of inquiry. Henry Holt and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey J (1960) The quest for certainty. Capricorn Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey J (1998) The essential Dewey, Volume 2: Ethics, logic, psychology. Indiana University Press, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbow P (1973) Writing without teachers. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fesmire S (2003) John Dewey and moral imagination: pragmatism in ethics. Indiana University Press, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafsi T, Turgut G (2013) Boardroom diversity and its effect on social performance: conceptualization and empirical evidence. J Bus Ethics 112(3):463–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1272-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt J (2001) The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychol Rev 108:814–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrand DL (2003) Beyond realism and antirealism: John Dewey and the neopragmatists. Vanderbilt University Press, Nashville

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • James W (1907) Pragmatism. Prometheus Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher P (2011) The ethical project. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • LaFollette H (2001) Pragmatic ethics. In: LaFollette H (ed) The Blackwell guide to ethical theory. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis J (1996) Life without principles: reconciling theory and practice. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Martela F (2015a) Pragmatism as an attitude. In: Zackariasson U (ed) Nordic studies in pragmatism 3: action, belief and inquiry – pragmatist perspectives on science, society and religion. Nordic Pragmatism Network, Helsinki, pp 187–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Martela F (2015b) Fallible inquiry with ethical ends-in-view: a pragmatist philosophy of science for organizational research. Organ Stud 36:537–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martela F (2017) Moral philosophers as ethical engineers: limits of moral philosophy and a pragmatist alternative. Metaphilosophy 48:58–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGilvary EB (1939) Professor Dewey: logician – ontologician. J Philos 36:561–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer M (1908) The exact number of pragmatisms. J Philos Psychol Sci Methods 5:321–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Pappas G (1997) Dewey’s moral theory: experience as method. Trans Charles S Peirce Soc 33:520–556

    Google Scholar 

  • Pihlström S (2005) Pragmatic moral realism: a transcendental defense. Rodopi, Amsterdam

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam H (1990) Realism with a human face. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Rai TS, Fiske AP (2011) Moral psychology is relationship regulation: moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality. Psychol Rev 118:57–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rescher N (1999) Realistic pragmatism: an introduction to pragmatic philosophy. State University of New York Press, Albany

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty R (1999) Philosophy and social hope. Penguin Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Werhane PH (1999) Moral imagination and management decision-making. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong DB (2006) Natural moralities: a defense of pluralistic relativism. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank Martela .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Martela, F. (2022). Is Moral Growth Possible for Managers?. In: Neesham, C., Reihlen, M., Schoeneborn, D. (eds) Handbook of Philosophy of Management. Handbooks in Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76606-1_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics