Skip to main content
Log in

Segmentation in the crustacean Artemia: engrailed staining studied with an antibody raised against the Artemia protein

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Roux's archives of developmental biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We have studied the process of post-embryonic segmentation in the anostracan crustacean Artemia franciscana using a specific antibody raised against the engrailed protein of this organism. Three cephalic segments are specified during embryonic development, before larval hatching, whilst trunk (thoracic) segmentation begins after the first stage free-swimming nauplius larva has emerged from the dormant cyst. Thus, cephalic and trunk segmentation seem to be at least in part independent and superimposed processes. Trunk stripes of engrailed expression are added one at a time as segments are generated from the posterior growth zone. The first detectable decision in engrailed expression is the establishment of a line of engrailed-expressing cells, interpretable as delineating the parasegmental boundary. The subsequent widening of engrailed stripes is not correlated with cell lineage events but is probably mediated by the combination of inheritance of the active state and recruitment of new cells into the engrailed-expressing stripe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akam M (1987) The molecular basis for metameric pattern in the Drosophila embryo. Development 101:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Akam M, Dawes R (1992) More than one way to splice an egg. Curr Biol 2:395–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson DT (1967) Larval development and segment formation in the branchiopod crustaceans Limnadia stanleyana King (Conchostraca) and Artemia salina (L.) (Anostraca). Aust J Zool 15:47–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson DT (1973) Embryology and phylogeny in annelids and arthropods. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Basler K, Struhl G (1994) Compartment boundaries and the control of Drosophila limb pattern by hedgehog protein. Nature 368:208–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Benesch R (1969) Zur Ontogenie und Morphologie von Artemia salina L. Zool Jahrb Abt Anat Ontog Tiere 86:307–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Bressan GM, Stanley KK (1987) pUEX, a bacterial expression vector related to pEX with universal host specificity. Nucl Acids Res 15:10056

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell GL, Caveney S (1989) engrailed gene expression in the abdominal segment of Oncopeltus: gradients and cell states in the insect segment. Development 106:727–737

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen S, Jürgens G (1991) Drosophila headlines. Trends Genet 7:267–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes R, Dawson I, Falciani F, Tear G, Akam M (1994) Dax, a locust Hox gene related to fushi-tarazu but showing no pairrule expression. Development 120:1561–1572

    Google Scholar 

  • DiNardo S, O'Farrell PH (1987) Establishment and refinement of segmental pattern in the Drosophila embryo: spatial control of engrailed expression by pair-rule genes. Genes Dev 1:1212–1225

    Google Scholar 

  • DiNardo S, Kuner JM, Theis J, O'Farrell PH (1985) Development of embryonic pattern in Drosophila melanogaster as revealed by accumulation of the nuclear engrailed protein. Cell 43:59–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Dohle W, Scholtz G (1988) Clonal analysis of the crustacean segment: the discordance between genealogical and segmental borders. Development 104 (Suppl):147–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleig R (1990) Engrailed expression and body segmentation in the honeybee Apis mellifera. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 198:467–473

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleig R (1994) Head segmentation in the embryo of the Colorado beetle Leptinotarsa decemlineata as seen with anti-en immunostaining. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 203:227–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman JA (1986) Epidermal cell proliferation during thoracic development in larvae of Artemia. J Crust Biol 6:37–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman JA (1989) Segment morphogenesis in Artemia larvae. In: ] Warner AH, Macrae TH, Bagshaw JC (eds) Cell and molecular biology of Artemia development. Plenum Press, New York, pp 77–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertzler PL, Clark WH Jr (1992) Cleavage and gastrulation in the shrimp Sicyonia ingentis: invagination is accompanied by oriented cell division. Development 116:127–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingham PW, Martinez-Arias A, Lawrence PA, Howard K (1985) Expression of engrailed in the parasegment of Drosophila. Nature 317:634–636

    Google Scholar 

  • Karr TL, Weir MD, Ali Z, Kornberg T (1989) Patterns of engrailed protein in early Drosophila embryos. Development 105:605–612

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinger M (1994) Segmentation in insects: how singular is Drosophila? Bio Essays 16:391–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraft R, Jäckle H (1994) Drosophila mode of metamerization in the embryogenesis of the lepidopteran insect Manduca sexta. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 91:6634–6638

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzanares M, Marco R, Garesse R (1993) Genomic organization and developmental pattern of expression of the engrailed gene from the brine shrimp Artemia. Development 118:1209–1219

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Arias A, Lawrence PA (1985) Parasegments and compartments in the Drosophila embryo. Nature 313:639–642

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchison TJ, Sedat J (1983) Localization of antigenic determinants in whole Drosophila embryos. Dev Biol 99:261–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Morata G, Lawrence PA (1975) Control of compartment development by the engrailed gene in Drosophila. Nature 255:614–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy LM (1994) A glance posterior. Curr Biol 4:811–814

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy LM, Carroll S (1994) Conservation of wingless patterning functions in short-germ embryos of Tribolium castaneum. Nature 367:460–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson CS, Clegg JS (1978) Cell division during the development of Artemia salina. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 184:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel NH (1994) Developmental evolution: insights from studies of insect segmentation. Science 266:581–590

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel NH, Martin-Blanco E, Coleman KG, Poole SJ, Ellis MC, Kornberg TB, Goodman CS (1989a) Expression of engrailed proteins in arthropods, annelids and chordates. Cell 58:955–968

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel NH, Kornberg TB, Goodman CS (1989b) Expression of engrailed during segmentation in grasshopper and crayfish. Development 107:201–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel NH, Ball EE, Goodman CS (1992) Changing role of even-skipped during the evolution of insect pattern formation. Nature 357:339–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel NH, Condron BG, Zinn K (1994) Pair-rule expression of even-skipped is found in both short- and long-germ beetles. Nature 367:429–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sander K (1976) Specification of the basic body pattern in insect embryogenesis. Adv Insect Physiol 12:125–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholtz G (1992) Cell lineage studies in the crayfish Cherax destructor (Crustacea, Decapoda): germ band formation, segmentation, and early neurogenesis. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 202:36–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholtz G (1995) Head segmentation in Crustacea- and immunoytochemical study. J Zool 98:36–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholtz G, Dohle W, Sandeman RE, Richter S (1993) Expression of engrailed can be lost and regained in cells of one clone in crustacean embryos. Int J Dev Biol 37:299–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholtz G, Patel NH, Dohle W (1994) Serially homologous engrailed stripes are generated via different cell lineages in the germ band of amphipod crustaceans (Malacostraca, Peracarida). Int J Dev Biol 38:471–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Schram FR (1986) Crustacea. Oxford University Press, Oxford New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrehardt A (1987) A scanning electron-microscope study of the post-embryonic development of Artemia. In: Sorgeloos P, Bengston DA, Dedeir W, Jaspers E (eds). Artemia research and its applications, vol 1. Universa Press, Wetteren, pp 532

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer RJ, Tautz D (1993) Involvement of an orthologue of the Drosophila pair-rule gene hairy in segment formation of the short germ-band embryo of Tribolium (Coleoptera). Nature 361:448–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern CD (1990) Two distinct mechanisms for segmentation? Sem Dev Biol 1:109–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JB, Bastiani MJ, Bate M, Goodman CS (1984) From grasshopper to Drosophila: a common plan for neuronal development. Nature 310:203–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Turquin MJ (1969) Le développement du systeme nerveux de Niphargus virei (Crustacée, Amphipode, Hypogé) Bull Soc Zool France 94:649–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyson GE, Sullivan ML (1980) Scanning electron microscopy of cuticular sensilla of Artemia; setae of the adult trunk segments. In: Persoone G, Sorgeloos P, Roels O, Jaspers E (eds). The Brine shrimp Artemia, vol 1. Universa Press, Wetteren, pp 99–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent JP, O'Farrell PH (1992) The state of engrailed expression is not clonally transmitted during early Drosophila development. Cell 68:923–931

    Google Scholar 

  • Weygoldt P (1958) Die Embryonalentwicklung des Amphipoden Gammarus pulex pulex (L.) Zool Jahrb Abt Anat Ontog Tiere 77:51–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams JA, Paddock SW, Vorwerk K, Carroll SB (1994) Organization of wing formation and induction of a wing-patterning gene at the dorsal/ventral compartment boundary. Nature 368:299–305

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Manzanares, M., Williams, T.A., Marco, R. et al. Segmentation in the crustacean Artemia: engrailed staining studied with an antibody raised against the Artemia protein. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 205, 424–431 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377222

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377222

Key words

Navigation