Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Coevolution of pierid butterflies and their cruciferous foodplants

I. The relative quality of available resources

  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Two Colorado populations of Pieris butterflies show a spectrum of larval growth responses to potential foodplant crucifer species growing in montane habitats. Analysis of larval growth responses to this array suggests potential selection for differential utilization of these species: 1) available crucifers vary considerably in the rates of larval survival and growth they support; 2) climatological factors favor larvae which develop rapidly. Food-related larval mortality and climatological factors may provide selection for utilization of crucifer species on which larvae develop rapidly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brues, C. T.: The specificity of foodplants in the evolution of phytophagous insects. Amer. Nature. 58, 127–144 (1924)

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, W. C. Jr., Jones, S. B. Jr., Mabry, T., Padolina, W. G.: Sesquiterpene lactonesinsect feeding deterrents in Vernonia. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2, 25–29, (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew, F. S.: Strategies of foodplant exploitation in a complex of oligophagous butterflies (Lepidoptera). Ph.D. dissertation, New Haven, Yale University (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • David, W. A. L., Gardiner, B. O.: Mustard oil glucosides as feeding stimulants for Pieris brassicae in a semi-synthetic diet. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 9, 247–255 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dethier, V. G.: Evolution of feeding preferences in phytophagous insects. Evolution 8, 33–54 (1954)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P. R., Breedlove, D., Brussard, P., Sharp, M.: Weather and the “regulation” of subalpine populations. Ecology 53, 243–247 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P. R., Raven, P. H.: Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution 18, 586–608 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelmann, F.: The physiology of insect reproduction. New York: Pergamon 1970

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraenkel, G. S.: The raison d'etre of secondary plant substances. Science (Wash. D. C.) 129, 1466–1470 (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, R. D.: Chemotaxonomy of flowering plants. Montreal: McGill-Queens University 1974

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegnauer, R.: Chemotaxonomie der Pflanzen. Basel: Birkhauser 1962–1969

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseffson, E.: Studies of the biochemical background to differences in glucosinolate content in Brassica napus L. II. Administration of some sulfur-35 and carbon-14 compounds and localization of metabolic blocks. Physiol. Plant. 24, 161–175 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • King, C. E.: Resource specialization and equilibrium population size in patchy environments. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.) 68, 2634–2637 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Labine, P. A.: The reproductive biology of the checkerspot butterfly, Euphydryas editha. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford, Stanford University (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Langenheim, J. H.: Vegetation and environmental patterns in the Crested Butte area, Gunnison County, Colorado. Ecol. Monog. 32, 249–285 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquand, R., Kuhn, H., Linser, H.: Der Einfluß der Schwefelernährung auf die Snefolbildung. Z. Pflanzenernähr. Bodenk. 121, 221–230 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Remington, C. L.: The biology of Nearctic Lepidoptera. I. Foodplants and life histories of Colorado Papilionidae. Psyche 59, 61–69 (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochow, T. F.: Ecological investigations of Thlaspi alpestre L. along an elevational gradient in the central Rocky Mountains. Ecology 51, 649–656 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffé, H.: A method for judging all contrasts in the analysis of variance. Biometrika 40, 87–104 (1953)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoonhoven, L. M.: Chemoreception of mustard oil glucosides in larvae of Pieris brassicae. Proc. roy. Acad. Sci. Amsterdam 70C, 556–568 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, P. W., Watt, W. B.: The thermal ecology of some Colias butterfly larvae. J. comp. Physiol. 83, 25–40 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Skytt-Andersen, A., Muir, R. M.: Auxin activity of glucobrassicin. Physiol. Plant. 19, 1038–1048 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor, G. W., Cochran, W. G.: Statistical methods, 6th ed. Ames: Iowa State University 1966

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorsteinson, A. J.: Host selection in phytophagous insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 5, 193–218 (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Dept. Commerce.: Climatological data, Colorado. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office 1949–1974

    Google Scholar 

  • Verschaffelt, E.: The cause determining the selection of food in some herbivorous insects. Proc. Sci. kon. Akad. Wet. Amsterdam 13, 536–542 (1910)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut

    Frances S. Chew

  2. The Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory, Crested Butte, Colorado

    Frances S. Chew

  3. Department of Biology, Tufts University, 02155, Medford, Massachusetts, USA

    Frances S. Chew

Authors
  1. Frances S. Chew
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chew, F.S. Coevolution of pierid butterflies and their cruciferous foodplants. Oecologia 20, 117–127 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00369024

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00369024

Keywords

Search

Navigation