Skip to main content
Log in

Flow cytometric assessment of cell viability: a multifaceted analysis

  • Reviews
  • Published:
Cytotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Flow cytometry offers the possibility to simultaneously analyze, on a cell by cell basis, different parameters related to cell viability i.e. cell size, morphology and incorporation of dyes. Different types of analysis: light absorption of unstained/stained cells, forward angle light scattering (FALS), right angle light scattering (RALS) or both, cell fluorescence based on dye retention or dye exclusion (due to erythrosin B, ethidium bromide, fluorescein diacetate, rhodamine 123) were tested and compared, with the classical Trypan blue exclusion test, for their effectiveness in the determination of cell viability. Two types of cells in monolayer cultures (L929, SIRC) and a freshly isolated suspension of mouse splenocytes were used. For each dye, the optimal dose, incubation time and conditions for analysis were determined. Viability indications by different techniques for the three type of cell line and their reliability as compared with Trypan blue were analyzed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aeschbacher M, Reinhardt CA and Zbinden G (1986) A rapid cell membrane permeability test using fluorescent dyes and flow cytometry. Cell Biol. Toxicol. 2: 247–255.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Benel L, Ronot X, Kornprobst M, Adolphe M and Mounolou JC (1986) Mitochondrial uptake of rhodamine 123 by articular chondrocytes. Cytometry 7: 281–285.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bhuyan BK, Loughman BE, Fraser TJ and Dai KJ (1976) Comparison of different methods of determining cell viability after exposure to cytotoxic compounds. Exp. Cell Res. 97: 275–280.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hecquet C, Ronot X, Le Naour L, Josse JG and Adolphe M (1987) In vitro methods for assessing cytotoxicity of contact lenses. Comparison with in vivo data. Alternative methods in Toxicology vol. 5, In vitro Toxicology: Approaches to Validation. Alan M Goldberg Ed.: 327–335.

  5. Horan PK and Loken MR (1985) A practical guide for the use of flow systems. In: Flow cytometry: Instrumentation and data analysis. Vandilla MA, Dean PN, Laerum OD and Melamed MR (eds), Acad. Press pp. 259–280.

  6. Jones KH and Senft JA (1985) An improved method to determine cell viability by simultaneous staining with fluorescein diacetate-propidium iodide. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 33: 77–79.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kamentsky LA, Melamed MR and Derman H (1965) Spectrophotometer: new instrument for ultrarapid cell analysis. Science 150: 630–631.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Krause AW, Carley WW and Webs WW (1984) Fluorescent erythrosin B is preferable to trypan blue as a vital exclusion dye for mammalian cells in monolayer culture. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 32: 1084–1090.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Loken MR, Sweet RG and Herzenberg LA (1976) Cell discriminating by multiangle light scattering. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 24: 284–291.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Melamed MR and Kamentsky LA (1969) Cytotoxic automation: a live-dead cell differential counter. Science 163: 285–286.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Métézeau M, Djaradi-Ohaniance L and Goldberg ME (1982) The kinetics and homogeneity of endocytosis of a receptor-bound ligand in a heterogeneous cell population studied by flow cytometry. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 30: 359–363.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pentilla A, McDowell EM and Trump BP (1977) Optical properties of normal and impured cells application of cytographic analysis to cell viability and volume studies. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 25: 9–20.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Prosperi E, Croce AC, Bottiroli G and Supino R (1986) Flow cytometric analysis of membrane permeability properties influencing intracellular accumulation and efflux of fluorescein. Cytometry 7: 70–75.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Reinhardt CA, Pelli DA and Zbinden G (1985) Interpretation of cell toxicity data for estimation of potential irritation. Fund. Chem. Toxic. 23: 247–252.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ronot X, Benel L, Adolphe M and Mounolou JC (1986) Mitochondrial analysis in living cells: the use of rhodamine 123 and flow cytometry. Biol. Cell. 57: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Roper PR and Drewinko B (1976) Comparison of in vitro methods to determine drug induced cell lethality. Cancer Res. 36: 2182–2188.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rotman B and Papermaster BW (1966) Membrane properties of living mammalian cells as studied by enzymatic hydrolysis of fluorogenic esters. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 55: 134–141.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stammati AP, Silano V and Zucco F (1981) Toxicology investigations with cell cultures systems. Toxicology 20: 19–153.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Combrier, E., Métézeau, P., Ronot, X. et al. Flow cytometric assessment of cell viability: a multifaceted analysis. Cytotechnology 2, 27–37 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00365412

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00365412

Key words

Navigation