Abstract
We employ an optimal solution to both the “shape from motion problem” and the related problem of the estimation of self-movement on a purely optical basis to deduce practical rules of thumb for the limits of the optic flow information content in the presence of perturbation of the motion parallax field. The results are illustrated and verified by means of a computer simulation.
The results allow estimates of the accuracy of depth and egomotion estimates as a function of the accuracy of data sampling and the width of field of view, as well as estimates of the interaction between rotational and translational components of the movement.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bruss AR, Horn BKP (1983) Passive navigation. Comput Vision Graph Image Process 21:3–20
Gibson JJ (1950) The perception of the visual world. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, Mass
Koenderink JJ, Doorn AJ van (1976) Local structure of movement parallax of the plane. J Opt Soc Am 66:717–723
Koenderink JJ, Doorn AJ van (1981) Exterospecific component of the motion parallax field. J Opt Soc Am 71:953–957
Koenderink JJ (1986) Optic flow. Vision Res 26:161–180
Longuet-Higgins HC, Prazdny K (1980) The interpretation of moving retinal images. Proc R Soc London Ser B208:385–387
Mach E (1962) Analysis of sensations (English translation 1962; originally published in 1886). Dover, New York
Maybank SJ (1986) Algorithm for analyzing optical flow based on the least-squares method. Image Vision Comp 4:38–42
Nakayama K (1985) Biological image motion processing: a review. Vision Res 25:625–660
Ullman S (1979) The interpretation of structure from motion. Proc R Soc London Ser B 203:405–426
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koenderink, J.J., van Doorn, A.J. Facts on optic flow. Biol. Cybern. 56, 247–254 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00365219
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00365219