Abstract
The fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster with its well known genetics is used to detect newly induced mutations in germ cells. Assay systems are available to determine point mutations, chromosome aberrations and nondisjunction. The sex-linked recessive lethal test is of primary practical importance, because it can detect mutagens with and without chromosome-breaking ability, which induce point mutations, small deletions or aberrations having a recessive lethal effect. For routine testing X-chromosomes are exposed to a potentially mutagenic treatment while the chromosome is in a male germ cell. In two successive crosses the treated X-chromosome is transferred to males of the F2-generation. Here, males carrying the treated chromosome can be detected based on easily scorable phenotypic characteristics (eye shape and color). The X-chromosome in F2-males is hemizygous, and therefore any recessive mutation is expressed: The presence of a recessive lethal kills all these males before they have developed into a fly, and this is easily scored as the absence of one mendelian class among the progeny.
The predictability of the test for established mutagens and carcinogens is quite good. In the order of 200 compounds are known for which positive results in the sex-linked recessive lethal assay were reported. Mono- and polyfunctional alkylating agents are easily detected even if they do not break chromosomes. Frameshift mutagens can be detected, but a systematic validation of the system for this type of damage would be very desirable. Of outstanding importance is the fact that a large variety of indirect acting carcinogens are easily detected in the Drosophila in vivo assay. It is assumed that the metabolic transformation takes place within the cell subsequently tested for the presence of induced mutations (e.g., spermatids). In addition to the more indirect evidence from mutagenicity tests, information is now accumulating on the biochemical characterization of xenobiotics metabolizing systems in Drosophila and on their inducibility.
An important technical problem is the selection of the route of application. Depending on the aim of the experiment and on the chemical properties of the compound under test, the route of application has to be selected with care, in order to assure that a significant exposure of the germ cells to the chemical or to its metabolites is achieved. Occasionally problems are encountered with water-insoluble compounds and the use of DMSO as solvent. These problems are currently under investigation. Possible means to increase the sensitivity of the test system for polycyclic hydrocarbons and aromatic amines are also studied. The use of Drosophila as an alternative test provides information on:
(i) mutations in germ cells, (ii) in vivo activation, (iii) broad mutation spectrum (base pair substitutions, frameshifts, deletions, etc.) in one single experiment, (iv) relevant dose level which can be expected to lead to a doubling of the human spontaneous mutation frequency.
The Drosophila tests have to be used in all cases in which point mutations in germ cells are considered a possible risk.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrahamson S, Lewis EB (1971) The detection of mutations in Drosophila melanogaster. In: Hollaender A (ed) Chemical mutagens, vol 2. Plenum Press, New York, p 461
Abrahamson S, Würgler FE, DeJongh C, Unger Meyer H (1980) How many loci on the X-chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster can mutate to recessive lethals? Environ Mutagenesis (in press)
Auerbach C (1979) The role of Drosophila in mutagen testing. In: Paget GE (ed) Mutagenesis in sub-mammalian systems. MTP Press, Lancaster, p 13
Baars AJ, Zijlstra JA, Vogel E, Breimer DD (1977) The occurence of cytochrome P-450 and aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase activity in Drosophila melanogaster microsomes, and the importance of this metabolizing capacity for the screening of carcinogenic and mutagenic properties of foreign compounds. Mutat Res 44:257–268
Baars AJ, Zijlstra JA, Jansen M, Vogel E, Breimer DD (1980) Xenobiotica-metabolizing enzymes in Drosophila melanogaster. Arch Toxicol Suppl 4:54–58
Cavalli-Sforza LL, Bodmer WF (1971) The genetics of human populations. Freeman, San Francisco
Clark AM (1959) Mutagenic activity of the alkaloid heliotrine in Drosophila. Nature 183:731–732
Clark AM (1960) The mutagenic activity of some pyrrolizidine alkaloids in Drosophila. Z Vererbungsl 91:74–80
Clark AM (1963) The brood pattern of sensitivity of the Drosophila testis to the mutagenic action of heliotrine. Z Vererbungsl 94:115–120
Graf U, Green MM., Würgler FE (1979a) Mutagen-sensitive mutants in Drosophila melanogaster. Effects on premutational damage. Mutat Res 63:101–112
Graf U, Vogel E, Biber UP, Würgler FE (1979b) Genetic control of mutagen sensitivity in Drosophila melanogaster. A new allele at the mei-9 locus on the X-chromosome. Mutat Res 59:129–133
Kastenbaum MA, Bowman KO (1970) Tables for determining the statistical significance of mutation frequencies. Mutat Res 9:527–549
Lee WR (1978) Dosimetry of chemical mutagens in eukaryote germ cells. In: Hollaender A, deSerres FJ (eds) Chemical mutagens, vol 5. Plenum Press, New York, p 177
Lee WR, Abrahamson S, Valencia R, VonHalle ES, Würgler FE, Zimmering S (1980) The sex-linked recessive lethal test for mutagenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. GENE-TOX report. Mutat Res (in press)
Lifschytz E, Falk R (1969) Fine structure analysis of a chromosome segment in Drosophila melanogaster: Analysis of ethyl-methanesulfonate-induced lethals. Mutat Res 8:147–155
Lim JK, Snyder LA (1968) The mutagenic effects of two monofunctional alkylating chemicals on mature spermatozoa of Drosophila. Mutat Res 6:129–137
Lindsley DL, Grell EH (1968) Genetic variations of Drosophila melanogaster. Carnegie Inst Wash Publ 627:472
Magnusson J, Hällström I, Ramel C (1979) Studies on metabolic activation of vinyl chloride in Drosophila melanogaster after pretreatment with phenobarbital and polychlorinated biphenyls. Chem-Biol Interact 24:287–298
Nguyen TD, Boyd JB (1977) The meiotic-9 (mei-9) mutants of Drosophila melanogaster are deficient in repair replication of DNA. Mol Gen Genet 158:141–147
Nguyen TD, Boyd JB, Green MM (1979) Sensitivity of Drosophila mutants to chemical carcinogens. Mutat Res 63:67–77
Nigsch J (1978) DDT-Resistenz und Nitrosamin-Empfindlichkeit genetisch verschiedener Stämme von Drosophila melanogaster. Ph.D. thesis. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zürich
Pasternak L (1962) Mutagene Wirkung von Dimethylnitrosamin bei Drosophila melanogaster. Naturwissenschaften 49:81
Pasternak L (1963) Untersuchungen über die mutagene Wirkung verschiedener Nitrosamine und Nitrosomethylharnstoff. Acta Biol Med Ger 10:436–438
Pasternak L (1964) Untersuchungen über die mutagene Wirkung verschiedener Nitrosamin- und Nitrosamid-Verbindungen. ArzneimForsch 14:802–804
Shukla PT (1972) Analysis of mutagen specificity in Drosophila melanogaster. Mutat Res 16:363–371
Shukla PT, Auerbach C (1979) The delayed mutagenic action of hydroxylamine in Drosophila. Mutat Res 61:399–400
Sorsa M (1979) Use of Drosophila in tests for environmental mutagens. In: Berg K (ed) Genetic damage in man caused by environmental agents. Academic Press, New York, p 431
Tates AD (1971) Cytodifferentiation during spermatogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Ph.D. thesis. University of Leiden, The Netherlands
Valencia R, Houtchens K (1980) The mutagenic activity of 10 coded compounds in the Drosophila sex-linked recessive lethal test. In: de Serres FJ, Ashby J (eds) Short-term tests for carcinogens: Report of the international collaborative program. Elsevier/North Holland, Amsterdam (in press)
Vogel E (1975) Mutagenic activity of cyclophosphamide, trofosfamide, and ifosfamide in Drosophila melanogaster. Specific induction of recessive lethals in the absence of detectable chromosome breakage. Mutat Res 33:221–228
Vogel E (1976a) The relation between mutational pattern and concentration by chemical mutagens in Drosophila. In: Montesano R, Bartsch H, Tomatis L (eds) Screening tests in chemical carcinogenesis. IARC Scient Publ No 12, IARC, Lyon, p 117
Vogel E (1976b) Mutagenicity of carcinogens in Drosophila as function of genotype-controlled metabolism. In: de Serres FJ, Fouts JR, Bend JR, Philpot RM (eds) In vitro metabolic activation in mutagenicity testing. Elsevier/North Holland Biomedical Press, Amsterdam, p 63
Vogel E (1977) Identification of carcinogens by mutagen testing in Drosophila: The relative reliability for the kinds of genetic damage measured. In: Hiatt HH, Watson JD, Winsten JA (eds) Origins of human cancer. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, p 1483
Vogel E, Lüers H (1975) A comparison of adult feeding to injection in Drosophila melanogaster. Drosophila Inform Serv 51:113–114
Vogel E, Sobels FH (1976) The function of Drosophila in genetic toxicology testing. In: Hollaender A (ed) Chemical mutagens, vol 4. Plenum Press, New York, p 93
Vogel E, Blijleven WGH, Kortselius MJH, Zijlstra JA (1980) Sex-linked recessive lethal tests in Drosophila melanogaster. In: de Serres FJ, Ashby J (eds) Short-term tests for carcinogens: Report of the international collaborative program. Elsevier/North Holland, Amsterdam (in press)
Würgler FE, Graf U (1980a) The mutagenic activity of 10 coded compounds in the Drosophila sex-linked recessive lethal assay. In: de Serres FJ, Ashby J (eds) Short-term tests for carcinogens: Report of the international collaborative program. Elsevier/North Holland, Amsterdam (in press)
Würgler FE, Graf U (1980b) Mutation induction in repair-deficient strains of Drosophila melanogaster In: De Serres FJ, Generoso WM, Shelby MD (eds) DNA repair and mutagenesis in eukaryotes. Plenum Press, New York
Würgler FE, Graf U, Berchtold W (1975) Statistical problems connected with the sex-linked recessive lethal test in Drosophila melanogaster. I. The use of the Kastenbaum-Bowman test. Arch Genet 48:158–178
Würgler FE, Sobels FH, Vogel E (1977) Drosophila as assay system for detecting genetic changes. In: Kilbey B, Legator M, Nichols W, Ramel C (eds) Handbook of mutagenicity test procedures. Elsevier/North Holland Biomedical Press, Amsterdam, p 335
Younes M, Siegers CP, Fuser JG (1979) Effect of dithiocarb and dimethyl sulfoxide on irreversible binding of 14C-bromobenzene to rat liver microsomal protein. Arch Toxicol 42:289–293
Zimmering S (1975) Utility of Drosophila for detection of potential environmental chemical mutagens. Ann NY Acad Sci 269:28–36
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Würgler, F.E. Mutagenicity testing with Drosophila . Arch. Toxicol. 46, 77–87 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00361247
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00361247