Skip to main content
Log in

Mutagenicity testing with Drosophila

  • Published:
Archives of Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster with its well known genetics is used to detect newly induced mutations in germ cells. Assay systems are available to determine point mutations, chromosome aberrations and nondisjunction. The sex-linked recessive lethal test is of primary practical importance, because it can detect mutagens with and without chromosome-breaking ability, which induce point mutations, small deletions or aberrations having a recessive lethal effect. For routine testing X-chromosomes are exposed to a potentially mutagenic treatment while the chromosome is in a male germ cell. In two successive crosses the treated X-chromosome is transferred to males of the F2-generation. Here, males carrying the treated chromosome can be detected based on easily scorable phenotypic characteristics (eye shape and color). The X-chromosome in F2-males is hemizygous, and therefore any recessive mutation is expressed: The presence of a recessive lethal kills all these males before they have developed into a fly, and this is easily scored as the absence of one mendelian class among the progeny.

The predictability of the test for established mutagens and carcinogens is quite good. In the order of 200 compounds are known for which positive results in the sex-linked recessive lethal assay were reported. Mono- and polyfunctional alkylating agents are easily detected even if they do not break chromosomes. Frameshift mutagens can be detected, but a systematic validation of the system for this type of damage would be very desirable. Of outstanding importance is the fact that a large variety of indirect acting carcinogens are easily detected in the Drosophila in vivo assay. It is assumed that the metabolic transformation takes place within the cell subsequently tested for the presence of induced mutations (e.g., spermatids). In addition to the more indirect evidence from mutagenicity tests, information is now accumulating on the biochemical characterization of xenobiotics metabolizing systems in Drosophila and on their inducibility.

An important technical problem is the selection of the route of application. Depending on the aim of the experiment and on the chemical properties of the compound under test, the route of application has to be selected with care, in order to assure that a significant exposure of the germ cells to the chemical or to its metabolites is achieved. Occasionally problems are encountered with water-insoluble compounds and the use of DMSO as solvent. These problems are currently under investigation. Possible means to increase the sensitivity of the test system for polycyclic hydrocarbons and aromatic amines are also studied. The use of Drosophila as an alternative test provides information on:

(i) mutations in germ cells, (ii) in vivo activation, (iii) broad mutation spectrum (base pair substitutions, frameshifts, deletions, etc.) in one single experiment, (iv) relevant dose level which can be expected to lead to a doubling of the human spontaneous mutation frequency.

The Drosophila tests have to be used in all cases in which point mutations in germ cells are considered a possible risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamson S, Lewis EB (1971) The detection of mutations in Drosophila melanogaster. In: Hollaender A (ed) Chemical mutagens, vol 2. Plenum Press, New York, p 461

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamson S, Würgler FE, DeJongh C, Unger Meyer H (1980) How many loci on the X-chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster can mutate to recessive lethals? Environ Mutagenesis (in press)

  • Auerbach C (1979) The role of Drosophila in mutagen testing. In: Paget GE (ed) Mutagenesis in sub-mammalian systems. MTP Press, Lancaster, p 13

    Google Scholar 

  • Baars AJ, Zijlstra JA, Vogel E, Breimer DD (1977) The occurence of cytochrome P-450 and aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase activity in Drosophila melanogaster microsomes, and the importance of this metabolizing capacity for the screening of carcinogenic and mutagenic properties of foreign compounds. Mutat Res 44:257–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Baars AJ, Zijlstra JA, Jansen M, Vogel E, Breimer DD (1980) Xenobiotica-metabolizing enzymes in Drosophila melanogaster. Arch Toxicol Suppl 4:54–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza LL, Bodmer WF (1971) The genetics of human populations. Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark AM (1959) Mutagenic activity of the alkaloid heliotrine in Drosophila. Nature 183:731–732

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark AM (1960) The mutagenic activity of some pyrrolizidine alkaloids in Drosophila. Z Vererbungsl 91:74–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark AM (1963) The brood pattern of sensitivity of the Drosophila testis to the mutagenic action of heliotrine. Z Vererbungsl 94:115–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Graf U, Green MM., Würgler FE (1979a) Mutagen-sensitive mutants in Drosophila melanogaster. Effects on premutational damage. Mutat Res 63:101–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Graf U, Vogel E, Biber UP, Würgler FE (1979b) Genetic control of mutagen sensitivity in Drosophila melanogaster. A new allele at the mei-9 locus on the X-chromosome. Mutat Res 59:129–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Kastenbaum MA, Bowman KO (1970) Tables for determining the statistical significance of mutation frequencies. Mutat Res 9:527–549

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee WR (1978) Dosimetry of chemical mutagens in eukaryote germ cells. In: Hollaender A, deSerres FJ (eds) Chemical mutagens, vol 5. Plenum Press, New York, p 177

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee WR, Abrahamson S, Valencia R, VonHalle ES, Würgler FE, Zimmering S (1980) The sex-linked recessive lethal test for mutagenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. GENE-TOX report. Mutat Res (in press)

  • Lifschytz E, Falk R (1969) Fine structure analysis of a chromosome segment in Drosophila melanogaster: Analysis of ethyl-methanesulfonate-induced lethals. Mutat Res 8:147–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim JK, Snyder LA (1968) The mutagenic effects of two monofunctional alkylating chemicals on mature spermatozoa of Drosophila. Mutat Res 6:129–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsley DL, Grell EH (1968) Genetic variations of Drosophila melanogaster. Carnegie Inst Wash Publ 627:472

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson J, Hällström I, Ramel C (1979) Studies on metabolic activation of vinyl chloride in Drosophila melanogaster after pretreatment with phenobarbital and polychlorinated biphenyls. Chem-Biol Interact 24:287–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen TD, Boyd JB (1977) The meiotic-9 (mei-9) mutants of Drosophila melanogaster are deficient in repair replication of DNA. Mol Gen Genet 158:141–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen TD, Boyd JB, Green MM (1979) Sensitivity of Drosophila mutants to chemical carcinogens. Mutat Res 63:67–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Nigsch J (1978) DDT-Resistenz und Nitrosamin-Empfindlichkeit genetisch verschiedener Stämme von Drosophila melanogaster. Ph.D. thesis. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasternak L (1962) Mutagene Wirkung von Dimethylnitrosamin bei Drosophila melanogaster. Naturwissenschaften 49:81

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasternak L (1963) Untersuchungen über die mutagene Wirkung verschiedener Nitrosamine und Nitrosomethylharnstoff. Acta Biol Med Ger 10:436–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasternak L (1964) Untersuchungen über die mutagene Wirkung verschiedener Nitrosamin- und Nitrosamid-Verbindungen. ArzneimForsch 14:802–804

    Google Scholar 

  • Shukla PT (1972) Analysis of mutagen specificity in Drosophila melanogaster. Mutat Res 16:363–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Shukla PT, Auerbach C (1979) The delayed mutagenic action of hydroxylamine in Drosophila. Mutat Res 61:399–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorsa M (1979) Use of Drosophila in tests for environmental mutagens. In: Berg K (ed) Genetic damage in man caused by environmental agents. Academic Press, New York, p 431

    Google Scholar 

  • Tates AD (1971) Cytodifferentiation during spermatogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Ph.D. thesis. University of Leiden, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Valencia R, Houtchens K (1980) The mutagenic activity of 10 coded compounds in the Drosophila sex-linked recessive lethal test. In: de Serres FJ, Ashby J (eds) Short-term tests for carcinogens: Report of the international collaborative program. Elsevier/North Holland, Amsterdam (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel E (1975) Mutagenic activity of cyclophosphamide, trofosfamide, and ifosfamide in Drosophila melanogaster. Specific induction of recessive lethals in the absence of detectable chromosome breakage. Mutat Res 33:221–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel E (1976a) The relation between mutational pattern and concentration by chemical mutagens in Drosophila. In: Montesano R, Bartsch H, Tomatis L (eds) Screening tests in chemical carcinogenesis. IARC Scient Publ No 12, IARC, Lyon, p 117

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel E (1976b) Mutagenicity of carcinogens in Drosophila as function of genotype-controlled metabolism. In: de Serres FJ, Fouts JR, Bend JR, Philpot RM (eds) In vitro metabolic activation in mutagenicity testing. Elsevier/North Holland Biomedical Press, Amsterdam, p 63

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel E (1977) Identification of carcinogens by mutagen testing in Drosophila: The relative reliability for the kinds of genetic damage measured. In: Hiatt HH, Watson JD, Winsten JA (eds) Origins of human cancer. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, p 1483

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel E, Lüers H (1975) A comparison of adult feeding to injection in Drosophila melanogaster. Drosophila Inform Serv 51:113–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel E, Sobels FH (1976) The function of Drosophila in genetic toxicology testing. In: Hollaender A (ed) Chemical mutagens, vol 4. Plenum Press, New York, p 93

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel E, Blijleven WGH, Kortselius MJH, Zijlstra JA (1980) Sex-linked recessive lethal tests in Drosophila melanogaster. In: de Serres FJ, Ashby J (eds) Short-term tests for carcinogens: Report of the international collaborative program. Elsevier/North Holland, Amsterdam (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Würgler FE, Graf U (1980a) The mutagenic activity of 10 coded compounds in the Drosophila sex-linked recessive lethal assay. In: de Serres FJ, Ashby J (eds) Short-term tests for carcinogens: Report of the international collaborative program. Elsevier/North Holland, Amsterdam (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Würgler FE, Graf U (1980b) Mutation induction in repair-deficient strains of Drosophila melanogaster In: De Serres FJ, Generoso WM, Shelby MD (eds) DNA repair and mutagenesis in eukaryotes. Plenum Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Würgler FE, Graf U, Berchtold W (1975) Statistical problems connected with the sex-linked recessive lethal test in Drosophila melanogaster. I. The use of the Kastenbaum-Bowman test. Arch Genet 48:158–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Würgler FE, Sobels FH, Vogel E (1977) Drosophila as assay system for detecting genetic changes. In: Kilbey B, Legator M, Nichols W, Ramel C (eds) Handbook of mutagenicity test procedures. Elsevier/North Holland Biomedical Press, Amsterdam, p 335

    Google Scholar 

  • Younes M, Siegers CP, Fuser JG (1979) Effect of dithiocarb and dimethyl sulfoxide on irreversible binding of 14C-bromobenzene to rat liver microsomal protein. Arch Toxicol 42:289–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmering S (1975) Utility of Drosophila for detection of potential environmental chemical mutagens. Ann NY Acad Sci 269:28–36

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Würgler, F.E. Mutagenicity testing with Drosophila . Arch. Toxicol. 46, 77–87 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00361247

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00361247

Key words

Navigation